选择合适的微分进化和粒子群优化方法来优化PI级联控制

K. Zielinski, M. Joost, R. Laur, B. Orlik
{"title":"选择合适的微分进化和粒子群优化方法来优化PI级联控制","authors":"K. Zielinski, M. Joost, R. Laur, B. Orlik","doi":"10.1109/OPTIM.2008.4602457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Robust control is an intensively studied field in control theory where analytical solutions for robust control problems often lead to complicated control structures. On the other hand, for simple structures like the PI cascade control l here are no analytical solutions which leads to the need of easy-to-use optimization algorithms. Differential evolution and particle swarm optimization are well suited for this problem because of the real-valued representation of solutions, fast convergence behavior and ease of use. However, seven al variants exist for both algorithms, and from literature if does not become clear which one performs best. Therefore, in this paper several strategies of differential evolution an d different neighborhood topologies for particle swarm optimization are applied for the optimization of a PI cascade control. A performance comparison shows that both algorithms are able to solve this optimization problem but especially using differential evolution the quality of the best solution varies for different strategies.","PeriodicalId":244464,"journal":{"name":"2008 11th International Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choosing suitable variants of Differential Evolution and Particle Swarm Optimization for the optimization of a PI cascade control\",\"authors\":\"K. Zielinski, M. Joost, R. Laur, B. Orlik\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OPTIM.2008.4602457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Robust control is an intensively studied field in control theory where analytical solutions for robust control problems often lead to complicated control structures. On the other hand, for simple structures like the PI cascade control l here are no analytical solutions which leads to the need of easy-to-use optimization algorithms. Differential evolution and particle swarm optimization are well suited for this problem because of the real-valued representation of solutions, fast convergence behavior and ease of use. However, seven al variants exist for both algorithms, and from literature if does not become clear which one performs best. Therefore, in this paper several strategies of differential evolution an d different neighborhood topologies for particle swarm optimization are applied for the optimization of a PI cascade control. A performance comparison shows that both algorithms are able to solve this optimization problem but especially using differential evolution the quality of the best solution varies for different strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 11th International Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 11th International Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/OPTIM.2008.4602457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 11th International Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OPTIM.2008.4602457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

鲁棒控制是控制理论中一个被广泛研究的领域,鲁棒控制问题的解析解往往导致复杂的控制结构。另一方面,对于像PI级联控制l这样的简单结构,这里没有解析解,这导致需要易于使用的优化算法。差分进化算法和粒子群算法具有解的实值表示、快速收敛和易于使用等优点,非常适合于求解该问题。然而,这两种算法都存在7种变体,从文献中还不清楚哪一种表现最好。因此,本文采用差分进化和不同邻域拓扑的粒子群优化策略对PI级联控制进行优化。性能比较表明,两种算法都能解决该优化问题,但特别是使用差分进化时,不同策略的最佳解的质量有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Choosing suitable variants of Differential Evolution and Particle Swarm Optimization for the optimization of a PI cascade control
Robust control is an intensively studied field in control theory where analytical solutions for robust control problems often lead to complicated control structures. On the other hand, for simple structures like the PI cascade control l here are no analytical solutions which leads to the need of easy-to-use optimization algorithms. Differential evolution and particle swarm optimization are well suited for this problem because of the real-valued representation of solutions, fast convergence behavior and ease of use. However, seven al variants exist for both algorithms, and from literature if does not become clear which one performs best. Therefore, in this paper several strategies of differential evolution an d different neighborhood topologies for particle swarm optimization are applied for the optimization of a PI cascade control. A performance comparison shows that both algorithms are able to solve this optimization problem but especially using differential evolution the quality of the best solution varies for different strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stand-alone power system with synchronous and asynchronous generators Analysis of permanent magnet claw-pole synchronous machine Control methods on unstable periodic orbits of a chaotic dynamical system — control chaos in buck converter Modular test bench for a hybrid electric vehicle with multiples energy sources Improvement of voltage stability and reduce power system losses by optimal GA-based allocation of multi-type FACTS devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1