参数化支配集问题的常不可逼近性

Yijia Chen, Bingkai Lin
{"title":"参数化支配集问题的常不可逼近性","authors":"Yijia Chen, Bingkai Lin","doi":"10.1109/FOCS.2016.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We prove that there is no fpt-algorithm that can approximate the dominating set problem with any constant ratio, unless FPT = W[1]. Our hardness reduction is built on the second author's recent W[1]-hardness proof of the biclique problem [25]. This yields, among other things, a proof without the PCP machinery that the classical dominating set problem has no polynomial time constant approximation under the exponential time hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":414001,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Constant Inapproximability of the Parameterized Dominating Set Problem\",\"authors\":\"Yijia Chen, Bingkai Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FOCS.2016.61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We prove that there is no fpt-algorithm that can approximate the dominating set problem with any constant ratio, unless FPT = W[1]. Our hardness reduction is built on the second author's recent W[1]-hardness proof of the biclique problem [25]. This yields, among other things, a proof without the PCP machinery that the classical dominating set problem has no polynomial time constant approximation under the exponential time hypothesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"47\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2016.61\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2016.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

摘要

我们证明了不存在能近似任意常数比支配集问题的FPT -算法,除非FPT = W[1]。我们的硬度还原是建立在第二作者最近的W[1]-对双曲线问题[25]的硬度证明之上的。这证明了经典支配集问题在指数时间假设下没有多项式时间常数近似,而不需要PCP机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Constant Inapproximability of the Parameterized Dominating Set Problem
We prove that there is no fpt-algorithm that can approximate the dominating set problem with any constant ratio, unless FPT = W[1]. Our hardness reduction is built on the second author's recent W[1]-hardness proof of the biclique problem [25]. This yields, among other things, a proof without the PCP machinery that the classical dominating set problem has no polynomial time constant approximation under the exponential time hypothesis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exponential Lower Bounds for Monotone Span Programs Truly Sub-cubic Algorithms for Language Edit Distance and RNA-Folding via Fast Bounded-Difference Min-Plus Product Polynomial-Time Tensor Decompositions with Sum-of-Squares Decremental Single-Source Reachability and Strongly Connected Components in Õ(m√n) Total Update Time NP-Hardness of Reed-Solomon Decoding and the Prouhet-Tarry-Escott Problem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1