基于udp的高速传输协议性能评价

Zhaojuan Yue, Yongmao Ren, Jun Li
{"title":"基于udp的高速传输协议性能评价","authors":"Zhaojuan Yue, Yongmao Ren, Jun Li","doi":"10.1109/ICSESS.2011.5982257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of high speed long distance networks has promoted the development of various e-science applications. The traditional TCP protocol is not suitable for high bandwidth-delay product networks because of its conservative Additive Increase Multiplicative Decrease (AIMD) congestion control algorithm and slow start strategy. This paper mainly introduces four kinds of typical UDP-based high speed transport protocols (RUBDP, Tsunami, UDT, and PA-UDP). By experiments on the test bed with end-to-end transport mode, the influence of the file size, loss ratio and RTT to the performance of the four protocols is evaluated. And, the intra-protocol fairness and inter-protocol fairness while transferring multiple parallel flows are also evaluated. The results show: PA-UDP protocol has the best transport performance; UDT protocol is the most convenient, because it does not require the users to set the initial sending rate, buffer size and other parameters.","PeriodicalId":108533,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of UDP-based high-speed transport protocols\",\"authors\":\"Zhaojuan Yue, Yongmao Ren, Jun Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSESS.2011.5982257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The emergence of high speed long distance networks has promoted the development of various e-science applications. The traditional TCP protocol is not suitable for high bandwidth-delay product networks because of its conservative Additive Increase Multiplicative Decrease (AIMD) congestion control algorithm and slow start strategy. This paper mainly introduces four kinds of typical UDP-based high speed transport protocols (RUBDP, Tsunami, UDT, and PA-UDP). By experiments on the test bed with end-to-end transport mode, the influence of the file size, loss ratio and RTT to the performance of the four protocols is evaluated. And, the intra-protocol fairness and inter-protocol fairness while transferring multiple parallel flows are also evaluated. The results show: PA-UDP protocol has the best transport performance; UDT protocol is the most convenient, because it does not require the users to set the initial sending rate, buffer size and other parameters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSESS.2011.5982257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSESS.2011.5982257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

高速长途网络的出现促进了各种电子科学应用的发展。传统的TCP协议由于其保守的AIMD (Additive Increase multiplative reduction)拥塞控制算法和慢启动策略而不适用于高带宽延迟的产品网络。本文主要介绍了四种典型的基于udp的高速传输协议(RUBDP、Tsunami、UDT和PA-UDP)。通过端到端传输模式的实验平台,评估了文件大小、丢包率和RTT对四种协议性能的影响。并对传输多个并行流时的协议内公平性和协议间公平性进行了评价。结果表明:PA-UDP协议具有最佳的传输性能;UDT协议是最方便的,因为它不需要用户设置初始发送速率、缓冲区大小等参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance evaluation of UDP-based high-speed transport protocols
The emergence of high speed long distance networks has promoted the development of various e-science applications. The traditional TCP protocol is not suitable for high bandwidth-delay product networks because of its conservative Additive Increase Multiplicative Decrease (AIMD) congestion control algorithm and slow start strategy. This paper mainly introduces four kinds of typical UDP-based high speed transport protocols (RUBDP, Tsunami, UDT, and PA-UDP). By experiments on the test bed with end-to-end transport mode, the influence of the file size, loss ratio and RTT to the performance of the four protocols is evaluated. And, the intra-protocol fairness and inter-protocol fairness while transferring multiple parallel flows are also evaluated. The results show: PA-UDP protocol has the best transport performance; UDT protocol is the most convenient, because it does not require the users to set the initial sending rate, buffer size and other parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The design of frequent sequence tree in incremental mining of sequential patterns Notice of RetractionA study of incentive mechanism to weaken bullwhip effect of supply chains Design patterns in object oriented analysis and design An operational model of security policies in Service-Oriented Applications An adaptive threshold segmentation method based on BP neural network for paper defect detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1