后记

Prasenjit Duara
{"title":"后记","authors":"Prasenjit Duara","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190129118.003.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The China–India field of study is a now a booming industry. Both comparisons and connections between the two giants are being researched and commented upon; more recently the relationship is being viewed in terms of their regional and global impact (Sen 2017). Why this is happening seems obvious enough, even if there are protests that such a procedure may be methodologically unsound. While population size (including the combined population), long histories, and broadly parallel modern developments are often cited to validate the study, the critics invoke the Himalayan barrier over millennia, entirely different political and social systems, and, not least, the vastly greater size of the contemporary Chinese economy compared to the Indian one....","PeriodicalId":165396,"journal":{"name":"Beyond Pan-Asianism","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epilogue\",\"authors\":\"Prasenjit Duara\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190129118.003.0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The China–India field of study is a now a booming industry. Both comparisons and connections between the two giants are being researched and commented upon; more recently the relationship is being viewed in terms of their regional and global impact (Sen 2017). Why this is happening seems obvious enough, even if there are protests that such a procedure may be methodologically unsound. While population size (including the combined population), long histories, and broadly parallel modern developments are often cited to validate the study, the critics invoke the Himalayan barrier over millennia, entirely different political and social systems, and, not least, the vastly greater size of the contemporary Chinese economy compared to the Indian one....\",\"PeriodicalId\":165396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Beyond Pan-Asianism\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Beyond Pan-Asianism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190129118.003.0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beyond Pan-Asianism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190129118.003.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中印研究领域现在是一个蓬勃发展的产业。这两个巨人之间的比较和联系正在被研究和评论;最近,人们从区域和全球影响的角度来看待这一关系(Sen 2017)。发生这种情况的原因似乎是显而易见的,即使有人抗议说,这种程序在方法上可能是不健全的。虽然人们经常引用人口规模(包括总人口)、悠久的历史和大致平行的现代发展来验证这一研究,但批评者援引了数千年来的喜马拉雅屏障、完全不同的政治和社会制度,以及与印度相比,当代中国经济规模大得多....
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Epilogue
The China–India field of study is a now a booming industry. Both comparisons and connections between the two giants are being researched and commented upon; more recently the relationship is being viewed in terms of their regional and global impact (Sen 2017). Why this is happening seems obvious enough, even if there are protests that such a procedure may be methodologically unsound. While population size (including the combined population), long histories, and broadly parallel modern developments are often cited to validate the study, the critics invoke the Himalayan barrier over millennia, entirely different political and social systems, and, not least, the vastly greater size of the contemporary Chinese economy compared to the Indian one....
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epilogue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1