{"title":"微波和超声波的结合——一个挑战","authors":"M. Vinatoru","doi":"10.4995/ampere2019.2019.9822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The literature related to microwave and ultrasound working simultaneously is rather infrequent. The reason is obvious: microwave irradiation is of electromagnetic origin while ultrasound is a mechanical vibration energy. Moreover, the optimal settings for ultrasound propagation throughout a reaction media do not coincide with the conditions required for application of microwaves. Therefore, the challenge is to find a way to best combination of these sources of energy into one apparatus to allow researchers to take advantage of the features of each technology. The oldest paper describing such a combination – microwave and ultrasound is having just 20 years [1] and describe an apparatus which uses a probe system delivering ultrasound through decalin to a vessel holding the reagents dipped in the MW cavity (fig. 1a). Another possibility using a normal MW oven is described by Peng [2] (fig.1b), but this setup is having radiation leakage problems and needs a proper protection. Ragaini et all proposed another type of setup [3] (fig. 1c), not easy to reproduce, but describing calibration and parameters which show an additive increase of thermal energy delivered when MW and US works simultaneous. Insert here uploaded pictures Figure 1. Some MW-US simultaneous setups Few years ago, Cravotto and Cintas [4], disccussed for the first time the potential of using MW and US in sequential or tandem setups. Their paper discuss all possible setups for using mostly glass probe for devlivery of ultrasonic energy or classical setup (fig. 1a). Slowly the concept gain popularity and the paper of Lionelly and Mason [5] prompts to the potential industrial applications, naming the combination of microwave with ultrasound a hybrid technology. The challenge in using this “hybrid technology” is to find a vesatile and reproducible apparatus able to deliver both microwave and ultrasound at a full controlable parameters. In our laboratory we have and use the setup like in the fig. 1a, but the ultrasonic energy is delivered by an ultrasonic cleaning device attached to microwave device (SAIREM Miniflow 200SS). To achieve the above mentioned outcome launched a project to build a device which could work with MW and US in tandem (as Cravotto mentioned [4]) using an US device able to deliver more than a single ultrasonic frequency at a full controlled power. It is our believe that such a device could significantly contribute to MW-US tandem equipment development. Based on our expertise and potential proposed interaction of US with reagents [6] we will investigate the influence (if any) of ultrasound upon MW field. In this paper we will present the earlier results of “Tandem Microwave Ultrasound” energy influence on chemical reagents. References 1. Lagha, A., et al., Analusis, 1999. 27(5): p. 452-457. 2. Peng, Y. and G. Song, Green Chemistry, 2001. 3(6): p. 302-304. 3. Ragaini, V., et al., Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2012. 19(4): p. 872-876. 4. Cravotto, G. and P. Cintas, Chemistry - A European Journal, 2007. 13(7): p. 1902-1909. 5. Leonelli, C. and T.J. Mason, Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2010. 49(9): p. 885-900. 6. Vinatoru, M. and T.J. Mason, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2018.","PeriodicalId":277158,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 17th International Conference on Microwave and High Frequency Heating","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MICROWAVE AND ULTRASOUNDS TOGETHER – A CHALLENGE\",\"authors\":\"M. Vinatoru\",\"doi\":\"10.4995/ampere2019.2019.9822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The literature related to microwave and ultrasound working simultaneously is rather infrequent. The reason is obvious: microwave irradiation is of electromagnetic origin while ultrasound is a mechanical vibration energy. Moreover, the optimal settings for ultrasound propagation throughout a reaction media do not coincide with the conditions required for application of microwaves. Therefore, the challenge is to find a way to best combination of these sources of energy into one apparatus to allow researchers to take advantage of the features of each technology. The oldest paper describing such a combination – microwave and ultrasound is having just 20 years [1] and describe an apparatus which uses a probe system delivering ultrasound through decalin to a vessel holding the reagents dipped in the MW cavity (fig. 1a). Another possibility using a normal MW oven is described by Peng [2] (fig.1b), but this setup is having radiation leakage problems and needs a proper protection. Ragaini et all proposed another type of setup [3] (fig. 1c), not easy to reproduce, but describing calibration and parameters which show an additive increase of thermal energy delivered when MW and US works simultaneous. Insert here uploaded pictures Figure 1. Some MW-US simultaneous setups Few years ago, Cravotto and Cintas [4], disccussed for the first time the potential of using MW and US in sequential or tandem setups. Their paper discuss all possible setups for using mostly glass probe for devlivery of ultrasonic energy or classical setup (fig. 1a). Slowly the concept gain popularity and the paper of Lionelly and Mason [5] prompts to the potential industrial applications, naming the combination of microwave with ultrasound a hybrid technology. The challenge in using this “hybrid technology” is to find a vesatile and reproducible apparatus able to deliver both microwave and ultrasound at a full controlable parameters. In our laboratory we have and use the setup like in the fig. 1a, but the ultrasonic energy is delivered by an ultrasonic cleaning device attached to microwave device (SAIREM Miniflow 200SS). To achieve the above mentioned outcome launched a project to build a device which could work with MW and US in tandem (as Cravotto mentioned [4]) using an US device able to deliver more than a single ultrasonic frequency at a full controlled power. It is our believe that such a device could significantly contribute to MW-US tandem equipment development. Based on our expertise and potential proposed interaction of US with reagents [6] we will investigate the influence (if any) of ultrasound upon MW field. In this paper we will present the earlier results of “Tandem Microwave Ultrasound” energy influence on chemical reagents. References 1. Lagha, A., et al., Analusis, 1999. 27(5): p. 452-457. 2. Peng, Y. and G. Song, Green Chemistry, 2001. 3(6): p. 302-304. 3. Ragaini, V., et al., Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2012. 19(4): p. 872-876. 4. Cravotto, G. and P. Cintas, Chemistry - A European Journal, 2007. 13(7): p. 1902-1909. 5. Leonelli, C. and T.J. Mason, Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2010. 49(9): p. 885-900. 6. Vinatoru, M. and T.J. Mason, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2018.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 17th International Conference on Microwave and High Frequency Heating\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 17th International Conference on Microwave and High Frequency Heating\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4995/ampere2019.2019.9822\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 17th International Conference on Microwave and High Frequency Heating","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/ampere2019.2019.9822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
有关微波和超声同时工作的文献很少。原因很明显:微波辐射是电磁源的,而超声波是机械振动能。此外,超声波在整个反应介质中传播的最佳设置与微波应用所需的条件不一致。因此,面临的挑战是找到一种方法,将这些能源最好地结合到一个设备中,使研究人员能够利用每种技术的特点。描述这种微波和超声波结合的最古老的论文只有20年[1],并描述了一种装置,该装置使用探针系统通过十氢化萘将超声波传递到一个容器中,容器中浸泡着浸在MW腔中的试剂(图1a)。彭[2](图1b)描述了使用普通毫瓦烤箱的另一种可能性,但这种设置有辐射泄漏问题,需要适当的保护。Ragaini等人提出了另一种类型的设置[3](图1c),不容易重现,但描述的校准和参数表明,当MW和US同时工作时,传递的热能会增加。在这里插入上传的图片图1。几年前,Cravotto和Cintas[4]首次讨论了在顺序或串联装置中使用MW和US的潜力。他们的论文讨论了所有可能的设置,主要使用玻璃探头来传递超声波能量或经典设置(图1a)。慢慢地,这个概念得到了普及,Lionelly和Mason[5]的论文提示了潜在的工业应用,将微波与超声波的结合命名为混合技术。使用这种“混合技术”的挑战是找到一种可重复使用的装置,能够以完全可控的参数传递微波和超声波。在我们的实验室中,我们有并使用如图1a所示的设置,但超声波能量是由附着在微波设备(SAIREM Miniflow 200SS)上的超声波清洗装置传递的。为了实现上述结果,启动了一个项目,建立一个可以与MW和US串联工作的设备(如Cravotto提到的[4]),使用一个能够在完全控制功率下提供多个单一超声波频率的美国设备。我们相信,这种装置可以为MW-US串联设备的发展做出重大贡献。基于我们的专业知识和潜在的US与试剂的相互作用[6],我们将研究超声波对MW场的影响(如果有的话)。本文将介绍“串联微波超声”能量对化学试剂影响的早期结果。参考文献1 . Lagha, A.等,《分析》,1999。27(5): p. 452-457。2 . 彭旸、宋国光,绿色化学,2001。3(6): p. 302-304。3 . Ragaini, V.等,超声与声化学,2012。19(4): 872-876页。4 . Cravotto, G.和P. Cintas,《化学》,欧洲杂志,2007。13(7): p. 1902-1909。5 . 莱昂内利,C.和T.J.梅森,化学工程与加工:过程强化,2010。49(9): 885-900页。6 . Vinatoru, M.和T.J. Mason,超声波和超声化学,2018。
The literature related to microwave and ultrasound working simultaneously is rather infrequent. The reason is obvious: microwave irradiation is of electromagnetic origin while ultrasound is a mechanical vibration energy. Moreover, the optimal settings for ultrasound propagation throughout a reaction media do not coincide with the conditions required for application of microwaves. Therefore, the challenge is to find a way to best combination of these sources of energy into one apparatus to allow researchers to take advantage of the features of each technology. The oldest paper describing such a combination – microwave and ultrasound is having just 20 years [1] and describe an apparatus which uses a probe system delivering ultrasound through decalin to a vessel holding the reagents dipped in the MW cavity (fig. 1a). Another possibility using a normal MW oven is described by Peng [2] (fig.1b), but this setup is having radiation leakage problems and needs a proper protection. Ragaini et all proposed another type of setup [3] (fig. 1c), not easy to reproduce, but describing calibration and parameters which show an additive increase of thermal energy delivered when MW and US works simultaneous. Insert here uploaded pictures Figure 1. Some MW-US simultaneous setups Few years ago, Cravotto and Cintas [4], disccussed for the first time the potential of using MW and US in sequential or tandem setups. Their paper discuss all possible setups for using mostly glass probe for devlivery of ultrasonic energy or classical setup (fig. 1a). Slowly the concept gain popularity and the paper of Lionelly and Mason [5] prompts to the potential industrial applications, naming the combination of microwave with ultrasound a hybrid technology. The challenge in using this “hybrid technology” is to find a vesatile and reproducible apparatus able to deliver both microwave and ultrasound at a full controlable parameters. In our laboratory we have and use the setup like in the fig. 1a, but the ultrasonic energy is delivered by an ultrasonic cleaning device attached to microwave device (SAIREM Miniflow 200SS). To achieve the above mentioned outcome launched a project to build a device which could work with MW and US in tandem (as Cravotto mentioned [4]) using an US device able to deliver more than a single ultrasonic frequency at a full controlled power. It is our believe that such a device could significantly contribute to MW-US tandem equipment development. Based on our expertise and potential proposed interaction of US with reagents [6] we will investigate the influence (if any) of ultrasound upon MW field. In this paper we will present the earlier results of “Tandem Microwave Ultrasound” energy influence on chemical reagents. References 1. Lagha, A., et al., Analusis, 1999. 27(5): p. 452-457. 2. Peng, Y. and G. Song, Green Chemistry, 2001. 3(6): p. 302-304. 3. Ragaini, V., et al., Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2012. 19(4): p. 872-876. 4. Cravotto, G. and P. Cintas, Chemistry - A European Journal, 2007. 13(7): p. 1902-1909. 5. Leonelli, C. and T.J. Mason, Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2010. 49(9): p. 885-900. 6. Vinatoru, M. and T.J. Mason, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2018.