需求响应能得到与传统发电相当的待遇吗?

Todd P. Hillman
{"title":"需求响应能得到与传统发电相当的待遇吗?","authors":"Todd P. Hillman","doi":"10.1109/PSCE.2011.5772544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With robust discussion at both the state and federal levels on the treatment and consideration of Demand Response, including Aggregators of Retail Choice (ARC) / Curtailment Service Providers (CSP), there are still many questions left to be answered. The debate seems to draw a definitive line in the sand and has the Independent System Operators (ISO) and Regional Transmission System Operators (RTO) in both the US and Canada stuck squarely in the middle of the discussions.","PeriodicalId":120665,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can demand response receive comparable treatment to traditional generation?\",\"authors\":\"Todd P. Hillman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PSCE.2011.5772544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With robust discussion at both the state and federal levels on the treatment and consideration of Demand Response, including Aggregators of Retail Choice (ARC) / Curtailment Service Providers (CSP), there are still many questions left to be answered. The debate seems to draw a definitive line in the sand and has the Independent System Operators (ISO) and Regional Transmission System Operators (RTO) in both the US and Canada stuck squarely in the middle of the discussions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PSCE.2011.5772544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PSCE.2011.5772544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在州和联邦层面对需求响应的处理和考虑进行了激烈的讨论,包括零售选择聚合商(ARC) /弃电服务提供商(CSP),仍有许多问题有待回答。这场争论似乎划下了一条明确的界限,美国和加拿大的独立系统运营商(ISO)和区域传输系统运营商(RTO)都被困在了讨论的中间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can demand response receive comparable treatment to traditional generation?
With robust discussion at both the state and federal levels on the treatment and consideration of Demand Response, including Aggregators of Retail Choice (ARC) / Curtailment Service Providers (CSP), there are still many questions left to be answered. The debate seems to draw a definitive line in the sand and has the Independent System Operators (ISO) and Regional Transmission System Operators (RTO) in both the US and Canada stuck squarely in the middle of the discussions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Testing the “smarts” in the smart T & D grid Similarity measures in Small World Stratification for distribution fault diagnosis Market-based transmission expansion planning Customer-centered control system for intelligent and green building with heuristic optimization Concepts of FACTS controllers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1