《圣经》释经方法论的发展:作者-经文-读者

A. Wieringen
{"title":"《圣经》释经方法论的发展:作者-经文-读者","authors":"A. Wieringen","doi":"10.29357/2521-179x.2018.21.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The methods used in biblical exegesis follow the developments within literary criticism, although at a certain distance. Every text analysis, both in biblical exegesis and literary criticism, has to deal with the triplet: author – text – reader. This triplet is in itself very obvious; but this is not the case for the chosen focus in this triplet. In this paper, I would like to describe the developments in the exegetical approaches from the view point of the three possible focusses in this triplet, against the background of the developments in literary criticism. After abstracting all sorts of details and various side-developments, I distinguish three phases: a first phase with a focus on the author from the 17th century onward, a second phase, with a focus on the text from the 60’s of the last century onward, and a third phase with a focus on the reader, existing since the last couple of decades. Because biblical exegesis is not just about theoretical approaches towards a text, but also about the concrete analyses of biblical texts, I will use especially Amos 7:10-17, the well-known story about the clash between the priest Amaziah and the prophet Amos, as an example of the three phases of exegetical methods, without giving an exhaustive exegesis, but pointing out some characteristic aspects of the exegesis in these three phases.I will conclude my paper by presenting my communication-oriented exegetical method, in which I integrate all three focusses of the three phases I distinguish.","PeriodicalId":436449,"journal":{"name":"Analecta of the UCU. Theology","volume":"179 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological Developments in Biblical Exegesis: Author – Text – Reader\",\"authors\":\"A. Wieringen\",\"doi\":\"10.29357/2521-179x.2018.21.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The methods used in biblical exegesis follow the developments within literary criticism, although at a certain distance. Every text analysis, both in biblical exegesis and literary criticism, has to deal with the triplet: author – text – reader. This triplet is in itself very obvious; but this is not the case for the chosen focus in this triplet. In this paper, I would like to describe the developments in the exegetical approaches from the view point of the three possible focusses in this triplet, against the background of the developments in literary criticism. After abstracting all sorts of details and various side-developments, I distinguish three phases: a first phase with a focus on the author from the 17th century onward, a second phase, with a focus on the text from the 60’s of the last century onward, and a third phase with a focus on the reader, existing since the last couple of decades. Because biblical exegesis is not just about theoretical approaches towards a text, but also about the concrete analyses of biblical texts, I will use especially Amos 7:10-17, the well-known story about the clash between the priest Amaziah and the prophet Amos, as an example of the three phases of exegetical methods, without giving an exhaustive exegesis, but pointing out some characteristic aspects of the exegesis in these three phases.I will conclude my paper by presenting my communication-oriented exegetical method, in which I integrate all three focusses of the three phases I distinguish.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analecta of the UCU. Theology\",\"volume\":\"179 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analecta of the UCU. Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29357/2521-179x.2018.21.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analecta of the UCU. Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29357/2521-179x.2018.21.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

圣经注释中使用的方法跟随文学批评的发展,尽管有一定的距离。每一种文本分析,无论是在圣经注释还是文学批评中,都必须处理作者-文本-读者这三位一体。这三句话本身是很明显的;但在这三连音中所选择的焦点并非如此。在本文中,我想在文学批评发展的背景下,从这三个可能的焦点的角度来描述训诂学方法的发展。在抽象了各种细节和各种侧面发展之后,我将其分为三个阶段:第一阶段侧重于17世纪以来的作者,第二阶段侧重于上世纪60年代以来的文本,第三阶段侧重于过去几十年以来存在的读者。因为圣经注释不仅仅是对文本的理论研究,也是对圣经文本的具体分析,我将特别以阿摩司书7:10-17为例,这个著名的关于祭司亚玛谢和先知阿摩司冲突的故事,作为注释方法的三个阶段的例子,我不会给出详尽的注释,但会指出这三个阶段的注释的一些特点。我将以我的以沟通为导向的训诂方法来结束我的论文,我把我区分的三个阶段的三个重点都整合在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methodological Developments in Biblical Exegesis: Author – Text – Reader
The methods used in biblical exegesis follow the developments within literary criticism, although at a certain distance. Every text analysis, both in biblical exegesis and literary criticism, has to deal with the triplet: author – text – reader. This triplet is in itself very obvious; but this is not the case for the chosen focus in this triplet. In this paper, I would like to describe the developments in the exegetical approaches from the view point of the three possible focusses in this triplet, against the background of the developments in literary criticism. After abstracting all sorts of details and various side-developments, I distinguish three phases: a first phase with a focus on the author from the 17th century onward, a second phase, with a focus on the text from the 60’s of the last century onward, and a third phase with a focus on the reader, existing since the last couple of decades. Because biblical exegesis is not just about theoretical approaches towards a text, but also about the concrete analyses of biblical texts, I will use especially Amos 7:10-17, the well-known story about the clash between the priest Amaziah and the prophet Amos, as an example of the three phases of exegetical methods, without giving an exhaustive exegesis, but pointing out some characteristic aspects of the exegesis in these three phases.I will conclude my paper by presenting my communication-oriented exegetical method, in which I integrate all three focusses of the three phases I distinguish.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Catholic Response to the Russia-Ukraine War The Praktikos and the Gnostikos by Evagrius Ponticus The War for the Russkiy Mir or Holy Rus? Ideological Roots of Russian Aggression Pro-euthanasia Mentality as a Denial of the Meaning of Suffering The Hymnographic Excellence of John of Damascus on the Example of His Iambic Canon for Christmas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1