测量和表征住宅DSL流量中的入站会话

S. Alcock, R. Nelson
{"title":"测量和表征住宅DSL流量中的入站会话","authors":"S. Alcock, R. Nelson","doi":"10.1109/ATNAC.2011.6096628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been assumed that the need for successful NAT traversal discourages residential DSL users from running services or applications that require them to accept connections from remote hosts. However, there are now numerous approaches for NAT traversal but there have been no studies measuring the prevalence of DSL users accepting inbound sessions. This paper presents an analysis of TCP and UDP flows initiated by remote clients to a group of residential DSL users, using packet traces captured from a New Zealand ISP between 2009 and 2011. Our analysis reveals that over half of all measured users accepted at least one inbound TCP or UDP session. There was no dominant port being used to accept sessions and port usage was spread over thousands of different ports. Skype and BitTorrent were the most popular application protocols observed and had increased in popularity over time. We also report on the use of dual SYNs to perform TCP NAT traversal in our data.","PeriodicalId":210916,"journal":{"name":"2011 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ATNAC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring and characterising inbound sessions in residential DSL traffic\",\"authors\":\"S. Alcock, R. Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ATNAC.2011.6096628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It has been assumed that the need for successful NAT traversal discourages residential DSL users from running services or applications that require them to accept connections from remote hosts. However, there are now numerous approaches for NAT traversal but there have been no studies measuring the prevalence of DSL users accepting inbound sessions. This paper presents an analysis of TCP and UDP flows initiated by remote clients to a group of residential DSL users, using packet traces captured from a New Zealand ISP between 2009 and 2011. Our analysis reveals that over half of all measured users accepted at least one inbound TCP or UDP session. There was no dominant port being used to accept sessions and port usage was spread over thousands of different ports. Skype and BitTorrent were the most popular application protocols observed and had increased in popularity over time. We also report on the use of dual SYNs to perform TCP NAT traversal in our data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ATNAC)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ATNAC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ATNAC.2011.6096628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ATNAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ATNAC.2011.6096628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人们一直认为,对成功的NAT穿越的需求阻碍了住宅DSL用户运行需要他们接受远程主机连接的服务或应用程序。然而,现在有许多NAT穿越的方法,但是没有研究测量DSL用户接受入站会话的流行程度。本文分析了由远程客户端向一组住宅DSL用户发起的TCP和UDP流,使用2009年至2011年间从新西兰ISP捕获的数据包跟踪。我们的分析显示,超过一半的测量用户接受至少一个入站TCP或UDP会话。没有用于接受会话的主导端口,端口的使用分布在数千个不同的端口上。Skype和bt是观察到的最受欢迎的应用程序协议,并且随着时间的推移越来越受欢迎。我们还报告了在数据中使用双syn来执行TCP NAT遍历的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring and characterising inbound sessions in residential DSL traffic
It has been assumed that the need for successful NAT traversal discourages residential DSL users from running services or applications that require them to accept connections from remote hosts. However, there are now numerous approaches for NAT traversal but there have been no studies measuring the prevalence of DSL users accepting inbound sessions. This paper presents an analysis of TCP and UDP flows initiated by remote clients to a group of residential DSL users, using packet traces captured from a New Zealand ISP between 2009 and 2011. Our analysis reveals that over half of all measured users accepted at least one inbound TCP or UDP session. There was no dominant port being used to accept sessions and port usage was spread over thousands of different ports. Skype and BitTorrent were the most popular application protocols observed and had increased in popularity over time. We also report on the use of dual SYNs to perform TCP NAT traversal in our data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The α-κ-µ Extreme distribution: Characterizing non-linear severe fading conditions Chromatic dispersion estimation based on complementary Golay sequences for 80 Gb/s QPSK single-carrier system with frequency domain equalization A framework to evaluate performance from an application and user perspective Enhancing network connectivity using smart mobile sensors The performance of blacklisting in ad hoc networks with unidirectional links
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1