评估团队凝聚力:团体环境问卷的效度

L. Brawley, A. Carron
{"title":"评估团队凝聚力:团体环境问卷的效度","authors":"L. Brawley, A. Carron","doi":"10.1123/JSP.9.3.275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The process of validating a recently developed instrument to assess perceived team cohesion is discussed. The Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ), an instrument designed to measure cohesion in sport teams, has good estimates for its internal consistency and for its content and factorial validity (Carron, Widmeyer, & Brawley, 1985; Widmeyer, Brawley, & Carron, 1985). However, other aspects of its validity required examination. The present article reports three studies concerning inspection of the GEQ's concurrent (Study 1), predictive (Study 2), and construct (Study 3) validities. In Study 1 the GEQ exhibited the predicted correspondence with similar measures of cohesion and was not significantly correlated with measures of other constructs. In Study 2 the GEQ successfully discriminated team and individual sport athletes by predicting their membership to these groups on the basis of their task cohesion scores. As well, classification of athletes as new and long-standing members of individual sport teams ...","PeriodicalId":442839,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sport Psychology","volume":"474 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"239","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Cohesion of Teams: Validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"L. Brawley, A. Carron\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/JSP.9.3.275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The process of validating a recently developed instrument to assess perceived team cohesion is discussed. The Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ), an instrument designed to measure cohesion in sport teams, has good estimates for its internal consistency and for its content and factorial validity (Carron, Widmeyer, & Brawley, 1985; Widmeyer, Brawley, & Carron, 1985). However, other aspects of its validity required examination. The present article reports three studies concerning inspection of the GEQ's concurrent (Study 1), predictive (Study 2), and construct (Study 3) validities. In Study 1 the GEQ exhibited the predicted correspondence with similar measures of cohesion and was not significantly correlated with measures of other constructs. In Study 2 the GEQ successfully discriminated team and individual sport athletes by predicting their membership to these groups on the basis of their task cohesion scores. As well, classification of athletes as new and long-standing members of individual sport teams ...\",\"PeriodicalId\":442839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Sport Psychology\",\"volume\":\"474 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"239\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Sport Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/JSP.9.3.275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sport Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/JSP.9.3.275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 239

摘要

验证最近开发的工具,以评估感知团队凝聚力的过程进行了讨论。团体环境问卷(GEQ)是一种旨在衡量运动团队凝聚力的工具,对其内部一致性、内容和析因效度有很好的估计(Carron, Widmeyer, & Brawley, 1985;Widmeyer, Brawley, & Carron, 1985)。然而,其有效性的其他方面需要审查。本文报道了三项关于GEQ并发效度(研究1)、预测效度(研究2)和建构效度(研究3)检验的研究。在研究1中,GEQ表现出与类似衔接测量的预测对应关系,而与其他构念的测量不显著相关。在研究2中,GEQ通过任务凝聚力得分预测团队和个人运动运动员的成员资格,成功地区分了团队和个人运动运动员。此外,将运动员分为个人运动队的新成员和老成员……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the Cohesion of Teams: Validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire
The process of validating a recently developed instrument to assess perceived team cohesion is discussed. The Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ), an instrument designed to measure cohesion in sport teams, has good estimates for its internal consistency and for its content and factorial validity (Carron, Widmeyer, & Brawley, 1985; Widmeyer, Brawley, & Carron, 1985). However, other aspects of its validity required examination. The present article reports three studies concerning inspection of the GEQ's concurrent (Study 1), predictive (Study 2), and construct (Study 3) validities. In Study 1 the GEQ exhibited the predicted correspondence with similar measures of cohesion and was not significantly correlated with measures of other constructs. In Study 2 the GEQ successfully discriminated team and individual sport athletes by predicting their membership to these groups on the basis of their task cohesion scores. As well, classification of athletes as new and long-standing members of individual sport teams ...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Visual Occlusion Training and Visual Allowance Training on Perceptual Distance and Actual Performance Distance of Golf Putting Conceptualizing the Construct of Athletic Identity in Korean Elite Athletes The Effects of the ACT-based Career Group Counseling Program for Retired Athletes in Their Teens A Study on Self-controlled Learning in Practice Conditions of Faded and Increased Feedback The Effect of Contextual Interference in Attentional Focus on Learning of Badminton High-Clear
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1