交流励磁机详细模型与简化模型的比较

IEEE PES General Meeting Pub Date : 2010-07-25 DOI:10.1109/PES.2010.5589982

J. Taborda

{"title":"交流励磁机详细模型与简化模型的比较","authors":"J. Taborda","doi":"10.1109/PES.2010.5589982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a performance comparison between a detailed AC exciter model and the classical AC exciter model as recommended in Standard “IEEE 421.5 Recommended Practice for Excitation System Models for Power System Stability Studies”. The main motivation of this comparison is to determine the degree of accuracy and the limitations of the AC exciter model recommended in IEEE 421.5.","PeriodicalId":177545,"journal":{"name":"IEEE PES General Meeting","volume":"196 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between detailed and simplified AC exciter models\",\"authors\":\"J. Taborda\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PES.2010.5589982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides a performance comparison between a detailed AC exciter model and the classical AC exciter model as recommended in Standard “IEEE 421.5 Recommended Practice for Excitation System Models for Power System Stability Studies”. The main motivation of this comparison is to determine the degree of accuracy and the limitations of the AC exciter model recommended in IEEE 421.5.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE PES General Meeting\",\"volume\":\"196 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE PES General Meeting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2010.5589982\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE PES General Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2010.5589982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

本文提供了一个详细的交流励磁器模型和标准IEEE 421.5中推荐的经典交流励磁器模型的性能比较。这种比较的主要动机是确定IEEE 421.5中推荐的交流励磁器模型的准确性和局限性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Comparison between detailed and simplified AC exciter models

This paper provides a performance comparison between a detailed AC exciter model and the classical AC exciter model as recommended in Standard “IEEE 421.5 Recommended Practice for Excitation System Models for Power System Stability Studies”. The main motivation of this comparison is to determine the degree of accuracy and the limitations of the AC exciter model recommended in IEEE 421.5.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

相关文献

二甲双胍通过HDAC6和FoxO3a转录调控肌肉生长抑制素诱导肌肉萎缩

IF 8.9 1区医学Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and MusclePub Date : 2021-11-02 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12833

Min Ju Kang, Ji Wook Moon, Jung Ok Lee, Ji Hae Kim, Eun Jeong Jung, Su Jin Kim, Joo Yeon Oh, Sang Woo Wu, Pu Reum Lee, Sun Hwa Park, Hyeon Soo Kim

具有疾病敏感单倍型的非亲属供体脐带血移植后的1型糖尿病

IF 3.2 3区医学Journal of Diabetes InvestigationPub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13939

Kensuke Matsumoto, Taisuke Matsuyama, Ritsu Sumiyoshi, Matsuo Takuji, Tadashi Yamamoto, Ryosuke Shirasaki, Haruko Tashiro

封面:蛋白质组学分析确定IRSp53和fastin是PRV输出和直接细胞-细胞传播的关键

IF 3.4 4区生物学ProteomicsPub Date : 2019-12-02 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201970201

Fei-Long Yu, Huan Miao, Jinjin Xia, Fan Jia, Huadong Wang, Fuqiang Xu, Lin Guo