叛国罪

Cécile Fabre
{"title":"叛国罪","authors":"Cécile Fabre","doi":"10.1093/nq/181.13.177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three out of the five kinds of spies listed by Sun Tzu in The Art of War are members of the enemy. To run a spy in foreign territory is to incite, condone, and benefit from treason. Treason presents one of the most serious ethical challenges to espionage and counter-intelligence operations. The chapter provides an account of the accusation of treason—of what a treasonous act consists in, and why it is presumptively wrongful. It then shows that treason is sometimes morally permissible in principle, indeed mandatory—not merely between enemies but also between declared allies, and not merely at the behest of just foreign actors but also at the behest of unjust foreign actors. The final section tackles the complex question of traitors’ acts of personal betrayal vis-à-vis their friends, relatives, and colleagues.","PeriodicalId":103916,"journal":{"name":"Spying Through a Glass Darkly","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treason\",\"authors\":\"Cécile Fabre\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nq/181.13.177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Three out of the five kinds of spies listed by Sun Tzu in The Art of War are members of the enemy. To run a spy in foreign territory is to incite, condone, and benefit from treason. Treason presents one of the most serious ethical challenges to espionage and counter-intelligence operations. The chapter provides an account of the accusation of treason—of what a treasonous act consists in, and why it is presumptively wrongful. It then shows that treason is sometimes morally permissible in principle, indeed mandatory—not merely between enemies but also between declared allies, and not merely at the behest of just foreign actors but also at the behest of unjust foreign actors. The final section tackles the complex question of traitors’ acts of personal betrayal vis-à-vis their friends, relatives, and colleagues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spying Through a Glass Darkly\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spying Through a Glass Darkly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/181.13.177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spying Through a Glass Darkly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/181.13.177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

孙子兵法中列出的五种间谍中有三种是敌人。在外国境内从事间谍活动就是煽动、纵容并从叛国中获益。叛国罪是间谍和反情报行动面临的最严重的道德挑战之一。这一章提供了对叛国罪的指控——叛国行为包括什么,以及为什么它被推定是错误的。这表明,叛国罪有时在道德上原则上是允许的,实际上是强制性的——不仅在敌人之间,也在宣布的盟友之间,不仅在正义的外国行为者的要求下,也在不公正的外国行为者的要求下。最后一节讨论了叛徒对-à-vis他们的朋友、亲戚和同事的个人背叛行为的复杂问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treason
Three out of the five kinds of spies listed by Sun Tzu in The Art of War are members of the enemy. To run a spy in foreign territory is to incite, condone, and benefit from treason. Treason presents one of the most serious ethical challenges to espionage and counter-intelligence operations. The chapter provides an account of the accusation of treason—of what a treasonous act consists in, and why it is presumptively wrongful. It then shows that treason is sometimes morally permissible in principle, indeed mandatory—not merely between enemies but also between declared allies, and not merely at the behest of just foreign actors but also at the behest of unjust foreign actors. The final section tackles the complex question of traitors’ acts of personal betrayal vis-à-vis their friends, relatives, and colleagues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Treason
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1