非手术胆囊引流:经皮和内镜入路

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tige.2021.06.004
Gregory Toy MD , Douglas G. Adler MD, FACG, AGAF, FASGE
{"title":"非手术胆囊引流:经皮和内镜入路","authors":"Gregory Toy MD ,&nbsp;Douglas G. Adler MD, FACG, AGAF, FASGE","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2021.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Acute cholecystitis<span><span><span> is a common condition affecting 500,000 Americans per year. Although the gold standard treatment is </span>cholecystectomy<span><span>, some patients are poor surgical candidates requiring alternative treatment. Alternative treatment usually involves gallbladder drainage through a percutaneous or endoscopic approach. One common endoscopic approach is the transpapillary approach which involves cannulating the </span>common bile duct<span><span> and cystic duct sequentially and inserting a stent into the gallbladder. This technique can be technically challenging as the cystic duct can be difficult to cannulate and has a risk of postprocedure </span>pancreatitis. However, this technique can be advantageous as it preserves a patient's </span></span></span>anatomy<span><span> for possible surgery in the future. The other common endoscopic approach is the transmural approach. This involves using an echoendoscope to determine an appropriate place to puncture the gallbladder and then using a needle and guidewire to create an opening to place a stent connecting the gallbladder and GI lumen. Use of a needle and guidewire can be obviated if an electrocautery method is used. This technique has an exceptionally high technical and clinical success rate but there is concern for </span>stent occlusion and tissue overgrowth in long term </span></span></span>stent placement. Technical and clinical success rates are similar between the percutaneous and transmural approaches which are higher than those in the transpapillary approach. Taken together, the endoscopic approaches are associated with shorter hospital stays and readmissions. Mortality rates are similar in all the approaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tige.2021.06.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonsurgical Gallbladder Drainage: Percutaneous and Endoscopic Approaches\",\"authors\":\"Gregory Toy MD ,&nbsp;Douglas G. Adler MD, FACG, AGAF, FASGE\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tige.2021.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Acute cholecystitis<span><span><span> is a common condition affecting 500,000 Americans per year. Although the gold standard treatment is </span>cholecystectomy<span><span>, some patients are poor surgical candidates requiring alternative treatment. Alternative treatment usually involves gallbladder drainage through a percutaneous or endoscopic approach. One common endoscopic approach is the transpapillary approach which involves cannulating the </span>common bile duct<span><span> and cystic duct sequentially and inserting a stent into the gallbladder. This technique can be technically challenging as the cystic duct can be difficult to cannulate and has a risk of postprocedure </span>pancreatitis. However, this technique can be advantageous as it preserves a patient's </span></span></span>anatomy<span><span> for possible surgery in the future. The other common endoscopic approach is the transmural approach. This involves using an echoendoscope to determine an appropriate place to puncture the gallbladder and then using a needle and guidewire to create an opening to place a stent connecting the gallbladder and GI lumen. Use of a needle and guidewire can be obviated if an electrocautery method is used. This technique has an exceptionally high technical and clinical success rate but there is concern for </span>stent occlusion and tissue overgrowth in long term </span></span></span>stent placement. Technical and clinical success rates are similar between the percutaneous and transmural approaches which are higher than those in the transpapillary approach. Taken together, the endoscopic approaches are associated with shorter hospital stays and readmissions. Mortality rates are similar in all the approaches.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tige.2021.06.004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030721000428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030721000428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性胆囊炎是一种常见疾病,每年影响50万美国人。虽然金标准治疗是胆囊切除术,但一些患者手术条件差,需要其他治疗方法。替代治疗通常包括经皮或内窥镜胆囊引流。一种常见的内窥镜入路是经乳头入路,它包括依次插管总胆管和胆囊管并将支架插入胆囊。这项技术在技术上具有挑战性,因为胆囊管很难插管,而且有术后胰腺炎的风险。然而,这种技术是有利的,因为它保留了病人的解剖结构,以便将来可能的手术。另一种常见的内镜入路是跨壁入路。这包括使用回声内窥镜确定一个合适的位置穿刺胆囊,然后使用针和导丝制造一个开口,放置连接胆囊和胃肠道管腔的支架。如果使用电灼法,可以避免使用针和导丝。该技术具有非常高的技术和临床成功率,但在长期支架放置中存在支架闭塞和组织过度生长的问题。经皮和经壁入路的技术和临床成功率相似,均高于经乳头入路。综上所述,内窥镜入路与较短的住院时间和再入院有关。所有方法的死亡率都差不多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nonsurgical Gallbladder Drainage: Percutaneous and Endoscopic Approaches

Acute cholecystitis is a common condition affecting 500,000 Americans per year. Although the gold standard treatment is cholecystectomy, some patients are poor surgical candidates requiring alternative treatment. Alternative treatment usually involves gallbladder drainage through a percutaneous or endoscopic approach. One common endoscopic approach is the transpapillary approach which involves cannulating the common bile duct and cystic duct sequentially and inserting a stent into the gallbladder. This technique can be technically challenging as the cystic duct can be difficult to cannulate and has a risk of postprocedure pancreatitis. However, this technique can be advantageous as it preserves a patient's anatomy for possible surgery in the future. The other common endoscopic approach is the transmural approach. This involves using an echoendoscope to determine an appropriate place to puncture the gallbladder and then using a needle and guidewire to create an opening to place a stent connecting the gallbladder and GI lumen. Use of a needle and guidewire can be obviated if an electrocautery method is used. This technique has an exceptionally high technical and clinical success rate but there is concern for stent occlusion and tissue overgrowth in long term stent placement. Technical and clinical success rates are similar between the percutaneous and transmural approaches which are higher than those in the transpapillary approach. Taken together, the endoscopic approaches are associated with shorter hospital stays and readmissions. Mortality rates are similar in all the approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Editorial Board Table of Contents Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1