Ninik Alfiyah, M. Saleh
{"title":"Implikasi”Yuridis Pembacaan dan Penandatanganan Akta Risalah e-RUPS yang Dibuat oleh Notaris","authors":"Ninik Alfiyah, M. Saleh","doi":"10.30595/kosmikhukum.v21i2.10283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid development of information technology has been responded to positively by the Indonesian government for a long time, especially in organizing an electronic GMS, as regulated in Article 77 of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. Guidelines for implementing e-GMS were only issued in 2020 because the Covid-19 pandemic threatens the economy and/or the stability of the country's financial system, this provision is in the form of POJK Number 16/POJK.04 / 2020. In Article 12 of the POJK, the implementation of e-GMS is obliged to be made in the form of a notary deed. This raises problems regarding the procedures for reading and signing deeds that cannot be done electronically because they are considered contrary to the Civil Code, the Law on Notary Position, and the ITE Law. The purpose of this research is to analyze the legal basis for the implementation of e-GMS and the minutes of the meeting and the legal consequences of reading and signing the e-GMS Notarial Deed electronically. This study uses a normative juridical research method. The results of the study explain that if the notary reads and signs the e-GMS deed electronically, it will have implications for the evidentiary power of the deed, which is equivalent to the letter under the bill because no regulation explicitly gives the notary authority in that field, so the advice given is e. -RUPS can be conducted electronically, however, the minutes of the meeting are made by the minutes of the meeting, and a copy is given to a notary so that the deed is in the form of a deed of partij and not a deed of relaas. Keywords:  legal implications, reading and signing of the deed, e-GMS","PeriodicalId":197254,"journal":{"name":"Kosmik Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kosmik Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v21i2.10283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,印尼政府一直积极响应信息技术的快速发展,特别是在组织电子GMS方面,正如2007年关于有限责任公司的第40号法律第77条规定的那样。由于2019冠状病毒病大流行威胁到经济和/或国家金融体系的稳定,因此仅在2020年发布了实施电子- gms的指导方针,该规定以POJK第16号/POJK的形式发布。04 / 2020。在POJK第12条中,e-GMS的实施必须以公证契约的形式进行。这就产生了关于阅读和签署不能以电子方式完成的契约的程序的问题,因为它们被认为违反了《民法典》、《公证法》和《信息技术交易法》。本研究的目的是分析e-GMS实施的法律依据以及电子阅读和签署e-GMS公证书的会议记录和法律后果。本研究采用规范的法学研究方法。研究结果解释,如果公证人以电子方式阅读和签署e- gms契约,将对契约的举证权产生影响,这相当于法案下的信件,因为没有规定明确赋予公证人在该领域的权力,因此给出的建议是e。-RUPS可以以电子方式进行,然而,会议记录是由会议记录制作的。而一份副本则会交给公证人,因此契约的形式是一方契据,而不是解除契据。关键词:法律含义,契约的阅读和签署,电子信息管理系统
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implikasi”Yuridis Pembacaan dan Penandatanganan Akta Risalah e-RUPS yang Dibuat oleh Notaris
The rapid development of information technology has been responded to positively by the Indonesian government for a long time, especially in organizing an electronic GMS, as regulated in Article 77 of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. Guidelines for implementing e-GMS were only issued in 2020 because the Covid-19 pandemic threatens the economy and/or the stability of the country's financial system, this provision is in the form of POJK Number 16/POJK.04 / 2020. In Article 12 of the POJK, the implementation of e-GMS is obliged to be made in the form of a notary deed. This raises problems regarding the procedures for reading and signing deeds that cannot be done electronically because they are considered contrary to the Civil Code, the Law on Notary Position, and the ITE Law. The purpose of this research is to analyze the legal basis for the implementation of e-GMS and the minutes of the meeting and the legal consequences of reading and signing the e-GMS Notarial Deed electronically. This study uses a normative juridical research method. The results of the study explain that if the notary reads and signs the e-GMS deed electronically, it will have implications for the evidentiary power of the deed, which is equivalent to the letter under the bill because no regulation explicitly gives the notary authority in that field, so the advice given is e. -RUPS can be conducted electronically, however, the minutes of the meeting are made by the minutes of the meeting, and a copy is given to a notary so that the deed is in the form of a deed of partij and not a deed of relaas. Keywords:  legal implications, reading and signing of the deed, e-GMS
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Indonesian-British Strategic Partnership in the Perspective of International Treaty Law Malaysia’s Indisputable Sovereignty Over Sabah Intellectual Property Based Financing: Juridical Review of Government Regulation Number 24 of 2022 And Relevance of Establishing Intellectual Property Rights Appraisal Institution Interpreting the Material Requirements of Recidivism: Realizing Restorative Justice in the Police Force Judicial Transformation: Integration of AI Judges in Innovating Indonesia's Criminal Justice System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1