媒体镜头下的银行

Eva A. Arnold
{"title":"媒体镜头下的银行","authors":"Eva A. Arnold","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3903919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is the first study evaluating whether depositors and supervisors should be concerned about media bias in banks’ coverage. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (1998) points out the media’s role as a secondary information source to depositors. Especially in times of (financial) crises, depositors need to be informed about their bank and the banking system’s safety. For this paper, we collect a unique data set containing almost 700,000 statements on more than 1,500 banks in 51 regional and 6 national German newspapers over 2007-2013. First, applying text analysis techniques, we quantitatively assess bank (type) coverage and sentiment. While regional and national outlets cover approximately the same number of banks and publish about the same amount of articles, we find that articles in national-wide newspapers require a higher literacy level. The main difference becomes apparent through sentiment analysis. On average, savings and cooperative banks are pictured more negatively in national than in regional newspapers. However, all news assess commercial banks most negatively, on average. Second, we describe the connectivity of newspapers and banks through geographical and network-driven distance measures. We thus provide a network perspective on banks throughout the crisis. Finally, we detect significant differences between regional and national newspapers using a difference-in-difference regression model, pointing to biases in coverage and sentiment.","PeriodicalId":344099,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Banking & Monetary Policy (Topic)","volume":"279 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Banks through the Lens of the Media\",\"authors\":\"Eva A. Arnold\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3903919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is the first study evaluating whether depositors and supervisors should be concerned about media bias in banks’ coverage. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (1998) points out the media’s role as a secondary information source to depositors. Especially in times of (financial) crises, depositors need to be informed about their bank and the banking system’s safety. For this paper, we collect a unique data set containing almost 700,000 statements on more than 1,500 banks in 51 regional and 6 national German newspapers over 2007-2013. First, applying text analysis techniques, we quantitatively assess bank (type) coverage and sentiment. While regional and national outlets cover approximately the same number of banks and publish about the same amount of articles, we find that articles in national-wide newspapers require a higher literacy level. The main difference becomes apparent through sentiment analysis. On average, savings and cooperative banks are pictured more negatively in national than in regional newspapers. However, all news assess commercial banks most negatively, on average. Second, we describe the connectivity of newspapers and banks through geographical and network-driven distance measures. We thus provide a network perspective on banks throughout the crisis. Finally, we detect significant differences between regional and national newspapers using a difference-in-difference regression model, pointing to biases in coverage and sentiment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Banking & Monetary Policy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"279 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Banking & Monetary Policy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3903919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Banking & Monetary Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3903919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是第一个评估存款人和监管者是否应该关注媒体对银行报道的偏见的研究。巴塞尔银行监管委员会(1998)指出,媒体是存款人的次要信息来源。特别是在(金融)危机时期,存款人需要了解他们的银行和银行体系的安全性。在本文中,我们收集了一个独特的数据集,其中包含2007-2013年间德国51家地区性报纸和6家全国性报纸上1500多家银行的近70万份报表。首先,应用文本分析技术,我们定量评估银行(类型)覆盖率和情绪。虽然区域性和全国性报纸覆盖的银行数量大致相同,发表的文章数量也大致相同,但我们发现,全国性报纸上的文章对文化水平的要求更高。通过情绪分析,主要的区别变得明显。平均而言,全国性报纸对储蓄银行和合作银行的描述比地区性报纸更为负面。然而,平均而言,所有新闻对商业银行的评价都是负面的。其次,我们通过地理和网络驱动的距离度量来描述报纸和银行的连通性。因此,我们提供了一个网络视角来看待整个危机中的银行。最后,我们使用差异中差异回归模型检测了地区和国家报纸之间的显著差异,指出了报道和情绪上的偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Banks through the Lens of the Media
This is the first study evaluating whether depositors and supervisors should be concerned about media bias in banks’ coverage. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (1998) points out the media’s role as a secondary information source to depositors. Especially in times of (financial) crises, depositors need to be informed about their bank and the banking system’s safety. For this paper, we collect a unique data set containing almost 700,000 statements on more than 1,500 banks in 51 regional and 6 national German newspapers over 2007-2013. First, applying text analysis techniques, we quantitatively assess bank (type) coverage and sentiment. While regional and national outlets cover approximately the same number of banks and publish about the same amount of articles, we find that articles in national-wide newspapers require a higher literacy level. The main difference becomes apparent through sentiment analysis. On average, savings and cooperative banks are pictured more negatively in national than in regional newspapers. However, all news assess commercial banks most negatively, on average. Second, we describe the connectivity of newspapers and banks through geographical and network-driven distance measures. We thus provide a network perspective on banks throughout the crisis. Finally, we detect significant differences between regional and national newspapers using a difference-in-difference regression model, pointing to biases in coverage and sentiment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Monetary Policy in a Low Interest Rate Environment: Reversal Rate and Risk-Taking A Tiering Rule to Balance the Impact of Negative Policy Rates on Banks Optimal Monetary Policy Mix at the Zero Lower Bound The Impacts of Monetary Policy on Banks' Loan Portfolio Risk-taking The Incredible Upside-Down Fixed-Income Market - Negative Interest Rates and Their Implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1