使用强化学习对自动化用户界面测试进行优先级排序

A. Nguyen, Bach Le, Vu Nguyen
{"title":"使用强化学习对自动化用户界面测试进行优先级排序","authors":"A. Nguyen, Bach Le, Vu Nguyen","doi":"10.1145/3345629.3345636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"User interface testing validates the correctness of an application through visual cues and interactive events emitted in real world usages. Performing user interface tests is a time-consuming process, and thus, many studies have focused on prioritizing test cases to help maintain the effectiveness of testing while reducing the need for a full execution. This paper describes a novel prioritization method that combines Reinforcement Learning and interaction coverage testing concepts. While Reinforcement Learning has been found to be suitable for rapid changing projects with abundant historical data, interaction coverage considers in depth the event-based aspects of user interface testing and provides a granular level at which the Reinforcement Learning system can gain more insights into individual test cases. We experiment and assess the proposed method using five data sets, finding that the method outperforms related methods and has the potential to be used in practice.","PeriodicalId":424201,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritizing automated user interface tests using reinforcement learning\",\"authors\":\"A. Nguyen, Bach Le, Vu Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3345629.3345636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"User interface testing validates the correctness of an application through visual cues and interactive events emitted in real world usages. Performing user interface tests is a time-consuming process, and thus, many studies have focused on prioritizing test cases to help maintain the effectiveness of testing while reducing the need for a full execution. This paper describes a novel prioritization method that combines Reinforcement Learning and interaction coverage testing concepts. While Reinforcement Learning has been found to be suitable for rapid changing projects with abundant historical data, interaction coverage considers in depth the event-based aspects of user interface testing and provides a granular level at which the Reinforcement Learning system can gain more insights into individual test cases. We experiment and assess the proposed method using five data sets, finding that the method outperforms related methods and has the potential to be used in practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3345629.3345636\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3345629.3345636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

用户界面测试通过在实际使用中发出的视觉提示和交互事件来验证应用程序的正确性。执行用户界面测试是一个耗时的过程,因此,许多研究都集中在测试用例的优先级上,以帮助维护测试的有效性,同时减少对完整执行的需求。本文描述了一种结合强化学习和交互覆盖测试概念的新型优先级排序方法。虽然强化学习已经被发现适合于具有丰富历史数据的快速变化的项目,但交互覆盖深入考虑了用户界面测试的基于事件的方面,并提供了一个粒度级别,在这个级别上强化学习系统可以获得对单个测试用例的更多见解。我们使用五个数据集对所提出的方法进行了实验和评估,发现该方法优于相关方法,具有在实践中使用的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prioritizing automated user interface tests using reinforcement learning
User interface testing validates the correctness of an application through visual cues and interactive events emitted in real world usages. Performing user interface tests is a time-consuming process, and thus, many studies have focused on prioritizing test cases to help maintain the effectiveness of testing while reducing the need for a full execution. This paper describes a novel prioritization method that combines Reinforcement Learning and interaction coverage testing concepts. While Reinforcement Learning has been found to be suitable for rapid changing projects with abundant historical data, interaction coverage considers in depth the event-based aspects of user interface testing and provides a granular level at which the Reinforcement Learning system can gain more insights into individual test cases. We experiment and assess the proposed method using five data sets, finding that the method outperforms related methods and has the potential to be used in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering An Evaluation of Parameter Pruning Approaches for Software Estimation Which Refactoring Reduces Bug Rate? Reviewer Recommendation using Software Artifact Traceability Graphs Prioritizing automated user interface tests using reinforcement learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1