{"title":"燃烧副产燃料的钢加热炉NOx排放","authors":"B. Adams, David H. Wang","doi":"10.1115/imece2001/htd-24229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A DOE-funded program was used to understand the mechanisms that control the formation of NOx during the combustion of steelmaking by-product fuels and to investigate possible low-cost control options to minimize the NOx emissions. This paper discusses the CFD modeling results of NOx emissions in a reheat furnace. The reheat furnace has a total of 20 burners distributed over three firing zones. The furnace is fired at a rate of 250 × 106 Btu/hr and an overall stoichiometric ratio of 1.06 (fuel lean). Fuels with heating values of approximate 500 Btu/SCF were examined, including coke oven gas (COG), blast furnace gas (BFG) and a blend of COG, BFG, natural gas (NG) and nitrogen. A good range of process variables was modeled to examine effects of fuel type, air preheat, stoichiometric ratio, firing rate and burner stoichiometry distribution on NOx emissions.\n Modeling results indicated that NOx formation in the reheat furnace is dominated by thermal NO, with some variation depending on the fuel fired. Temperature profiles showed an effective separation of the furnace interior into top and bottom zones as a result of the steel slab barrier. Higher temperatures characterized the bottom zone and elevated NOx levels as a result of the confined space and enhanced fuel air mixing provided by the slab supports. Results also showed that reburning of NOx plays a significant role in final NOx emissions with 30–40% of NOx formed being reduced by reburning in most cases. Modeling identified that operating the side burners in each burner zone slightly substoichiometric (while maintaining the overall furnace stoichiometry at 1.06) provided significant NOx reduction via reburning. NOx reductions of 23% and 30% were predicted when firing with COG and COG-NG-Air fuels, respectively. Overall furnace exit temperatures and heat flux profiles were not significantly affected by the biased firing.","PeriodicalId":426926,"journal":{"name":"Heat Transfer: Volume 4 — Combustion and Energy Systems","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NOx Emissions in a Steel Reheat Furnace Firing By-Product Fuels\",\"authors\":\"B. Adams, David H. Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/imece2001/htd-24229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A DOE-funded program was used to understand the mechanisms that control the formation of NOx during the combustion of steelmaking by-product fuels and to investigate possible low-cost control options to minimize the NOx emissions. This paper discusses the CFD modeling results of NOx emissions in a reheat furnace. The reheat furnace has a total of 20 burners distributed over three firing zones. The furnace is fired at a rate of 250 × 106 Btu/hr and an overall stoichiometric ratio of 1.06 (fuel lean). Fuels with heating values of approximate 500 Btu/SCF were examined, including coke oven gas (COG), blast furnace gas (BFG) and a blend of COG, BFG, natural gas (NG) and nitrogen. A good range of process variables was modeled to examine effects of fuel type, air preheat, stoichiometric ratio, firing rate and burner stoichiometry distribution on NOx emissions.\\n Modeling results indicated that NOx formation in the reheat furnace is dominated by thermal NO, with some variation depending on the fuel fired. Temperature profiles showed an effective separation of the furnace interior into top and bottom zones as a result of the steel slab barrier. Higher temperatures characterized the bottom zone and elevated NOx levels as a result of the confined space and enhanced fuel air mixing provided by the slab supports. Results also showed that reburning of NOx plays a significant role in final NOx emissions with 30–40% of NOx formed being reduced by reburning in most cases. Modeling identified that operating the side burners in each burner zone slightly substoichiometric (while maintaining the overall furnace stoichiometry at 1.06) provided significant NOx reduction via reburning. NOx reductions of 23% and 30% were predicted when firing with COG and COG-NG-Air fuels, respectively. Overall furnace exit temperatures and heat flux profiles were not significantly affected by the biased firing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heat Transfer: Volume 4 — Combustion and Energy Systems\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heat Transfer: Volume 4 — Combustion and Energy Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2001/htd-24229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Transfer: Volume 4 — Combustion and Energy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2001/htd-24229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
美国能源部资助的一个项目用于了解炼钢副产品燃料燃烧过程中控制氮氧化物形成的机制,并研究可能的低成本控制方案,以最大限度地减少氮氧化物排放。本文讨论了加热炉内NOx排放的CFD模拟结果。加热炉共有20个燃烧器,分布在三个燃烧区。炉的燃烧速率为250 × 106 Btu/hr,总化学计量比为1.06(燃料稀薄)。研究人员检测了热值约为500 Btu/SCF的燃料,包括焦炉煤气(COG)、高炉煤气(BFG)以及焦炉煤气、BFG、天然气(NG)和氮气的混合物。模拟了一系列过程变量,以检验燃料类型、空气预热、化学计量比、燃烧速率和燃烧器化学计量分布对NOx排放的影响。模拟结果表明,再加热炉内NOx的生成以热NO为主,并随燃料的不同而有一定的变化。温度分布表明,由于钢坯屏障,炉内有效地分离为顶部和底部区域。由于平板支架提供的密闭空间和增强的燃料空气混合,底部区域温度较高,NOx水平升高。结果还表明,NOx的再燃烧在最终NOx排放中起着重要作用,在大多数情况下,再燃烧减少了30-40%的NOx生成。建模表明,在每个燃烧器区域操作侧燃烧器的化学计量值略低于1.06(同时保持整个炉的化学计量值为1.06),通过再燃烧可以显著减少NOx。在使用COG和COG- ng - air燃料时,预计氮氧化物排放量分别减少23%和30%。总体炉膛出口温度和热流密度分布不受偏烧的显著影响。
NOx Emissions in a Steel Reheat Furnace Firing By-Product Fuels
A DOE-funded program was used to understand the mechanisms that control the formation of NOx during the combustion of steelmaking by-product fuels and to investigate possible low-cost control options to minimize the NOx emissions. This paper discusses the CFD modeling results of NOx emissions in a reheat furnace. The reheat furnace has a total of 20 burners distributed over three firing zones. The furnace is fired at a rate of 250 × 106 Btu/hr and an overall stoichiometric ratio of 1.06 (fuel lean). Fuels with heating values of approximate 500 Btu/SCF were examined, including coke oven gas (COG), blast furnace gas (BFG) and a blend of COG, BFG, natural gas (NG) and nitrogen. A good range of process variables was modeled to examine effects of fuel type, air preheat, stoichiometric ratio, firing rate and burner stoichiometry distribution on NOx emissions.
Modeling results indicated that NOx formation in the reheat furnace is dominated by thermal NO, with some variation depending on the fuel fired. Temperature profiles showed an effective separation of the furnace interior into top and bottom zones as a result of the steel slab barrier. Higher temperatures characterized the bottom zone and elevated NOx levels as a result of the confined space and enhanced fuel air mixing provided by the slab supports. Results also showed that reburning of NOx plays a significant role in final NOx emissions with 30–40% of NOx formed being reduced by reburning in most cases. Modeling identified that operating the side burners in each burner zone slightly substoichiometric (while maintaining the overall furnace stoichiometry at 1.06) provided significant NOx reduction via reburning. NOx reductions of 23% and 30% were predicted when firing with COG and COG-NG-Air fuels, respectively. Overall furnace exit temperatures and heat flux profiles were not significantly affected by the biased firing.