在庇护审查过程中语言专业知识的商业化

E. Al-Wer, Maria Fanis
{"title":"在庇护审查过程中语言专业知识的商业化","authors":"E. Al-Wer, Maria Fanis","doi":"10.4324/9781351041782-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the effects of commercialisation on the process of asylum vetting. With a focus on a specific asylum appeals case in the United Kingdom, the chapter illustrates how the privatisation of the linguistic forensic services in this process has a negative effect on the use of language for the determination of the asylum seekers’ place of origin. Using the epistemic communities as a theoretical framework, we argue that the commercialisation of the expert knowledge of the linguists involved in asylum vetting has detrimental consequences on the use of expert knowledge for the public good.","PeriodicalId":309708,"journal":{"name":"The Business of Words","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The commercialisation of linguistic expertise in the asylum vetting process\",\"authors\":\"E. Al-Wer, Maria Fanis\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781351041782-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter examines the effects of commercialisation on the process of asylum vetting. With a focus on a specific asylum appeals case in the United Kingdom, the chapter illustrates how the privatisation of the linguistic forensic services in this process has a negative effect on the use of language for the determination of the asylum seekers’ place of origin. Using the epistemic communities as a theoretical framework, we argue that the commercialisation of the expert knowledge of the linguists involved in asylum vetting has detrimental consequences on the use of expert knowledge for the public good.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Business of Words\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Business of Words\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041782-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Business of Words","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041782-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章探讨了商业化对庇护审查过程的影响。本章以联合王国的一个具体庇护上诉案件为重点,说明在这一过程中语言法医服务的私有化如何对确定寻求庇护者原籍地的语言使用产生负面影响。以认知共同体为理论框架,我们认为,参与庇护审查的语言学家的专业知识的商业化对专业知识为公共利益的使用产生了有害的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The commercialisation of linguistic expertise in the asylum vetting process
This chapter examines the effects of commercialisation on the process of asylum vetting. With a focus on a specific asylum appeals case in the United Kingdom, the chapter illustrates how the privatisation of the linguistic forensic services in this process has a negative effect on the use of language for the determination of the asylum seekers’ place of origin. Using the epistemic communities as a theoretical framework, we argue that the commercialisation of the expert knowledge of the linguists involved in asylum vetting has detrimental consequences on the use of expert knowledge for the public good.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Judges as wordsmiths Making (up) the news Unwriteable discourse? The (grubby) business of words The linguistic business of marketing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1