{"title":"九世纪科普特“书籍革命”和多文本手稿的出现","authors":"P. Buzi","doi":"10.1515/9783110645989-006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In this article, I am going to analyse how the typology of Coptic multiple-text manuscripts (MTMs) evolved in relation to their content and regional prove-nance, showing how Coptic literature and Coptic book production underwent a revolutionary transformation that started in the ninth century, becoming something completely different from what it was before. Summarizing the studies on the development of Coptic literature carried out by Tito Orlandi, Martin Krause and others, Siegfried Richter writes: older works. cases, Coptic This assertion is certainly correct: what we have is mainly transmitted by codices that date back to between the ninth and the eleventh centuries and consists of a targeted selection of contents that do not fully correspond to the primeval nature of Coptic literature.","PeriodicalId":249673,"journal":{"name":"The Emergence of Multiple-Text Manuscripts","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ninth-Century Coptic ‘Book Revolution’ and the Emergence of Multiple-Text Manuscripts\",\"authors\":\"P. Buzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110645989-006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": In this article, I am going to analyse how the typology of Coptic multiple-text manuscripts (MTMs) evolved in relation to their content and regional prove-nance, showing how Coptic literature and Coptic book production underwent a revolutionary transformation that started in the ninth century, becoming something completely different from what it was before. Summarizing the studies on the development of Coptic literature carried out by Tito Orlandi, Martin Krause and others, Siegfried Richter writes: older works. cases, Coptic This assertion is certainly correct: what we have is mainly transmitted by codices that date back to between the ninth and the eleventh centuries and consists of a targeted selection of contents that do not fully correspond to the primeval nature of Coptic literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Emergence of Multiple-Text Manuscripts\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Emergence of Multiple-Text Manuscripts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110645989-006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Emergence of Multiple-Text Manuscripts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110645989-006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在这篇文章中,我将分析科普特多文本手稿(mtm)的类型学是如何根据其内容和地区出处而演变的,展示了科普特文学和科普特书籍生产是如何经历了从9世纪开始的革命性转变,成为与以前完全不同的东西。Siegfried Richter总结了Tito Orlandi, Martin Krause等人对科普特文学发展的研究,他写道:这种说法当然是正确的:我们所拥有的主要是通过可以追溯到9世纪到11世纪之间的抄本传播的,其中包含了一些有针对性的内容,这些内容并不完全符合科普特文学的原始性质。
The Ninth-Century Coptic ‘Book Revolution’ and the Emergence of Multiple-Text Manuscripts
: In this article, I am going to analyse how the typology of Coptic multiple-text manuscripts (MTMs) evolved in relation to their content and regional prove-nance, showing how Coptic literature and Coptic book production underwent a revolutionary transformation that started in the ninth century, becoming something completely different from what it was before. Summarizing the studies on the development of Coptic literature carried out by Tito Orlandi, Martin Krause and others, Siegfried Richter writes: older works. cases, Coptic This assertion is certainly correct: what we have is mainly transmitted by codices that date back to between the ninth and the eleventh centuries and consists of a targeted selection of contents that do not fully correspond to the primeval nature of Coptic literature.