硬件安全的新原则

A. Hastings, S. Sethumadhavan
{"title":"硬件安全的新原则","authors":"A. Hastings, S. Sethumadhavan","doi":"10.1145/3411504.3421217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we promote the idea that recent woes in hardware security are not because of a lack of technical solutions but rather because market forces and incentives prevent those with the ability to fix problems from doing so. At the root of the problem is the fact that hardware security comes at a cost; present issues in hardware security can be seen as the result of the players in the game of hardware security finding ways of avoiding paying this cost. We formulate this idea into a doctrine of security, namely the Doctrine of Shared Burdens. Three cases studies-Rowhammer, Spectre, and Meltdown-are interpreted though the lens of this doctrine. Our doctrine illuminates why these problems exist and what can be done about them.","PeriodicalId":136554,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Attacks and Solutions in Hardware Security","volume":"152 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WaC: A New Doctrine for Hardware Security\",\"authors\":\"A. Hastings, S. Sethumadhavan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3411504.3421217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we promote the idea that recent woes in hardware security are not because of a lack of technical solutions but rather because market forces and incentives prevent those with the ability to fix problems from doing so. At the root of the problem is the fact that hardware security comes at a cost; present issues in hardware security can be seen as the result of the players in the game of hardware security finding ways of avoiding paying this cost. We formulate this idea into a doctrine of security, namely the Doctrine of Shared Burdens. Three cases studies-Rowhammer, Spectre, and Meltdown-are interpreted though the lens of this doctrine. Our doctrine illuminates why these problems exist and what can be done about them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Attacks and Solutions in Hardware Security\",\"volume\":\"152 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Attacks and Solutions in Hardware Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3411504.3421217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Attacks and Solutions in Hardware Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3411504.3421217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了这样一种观点,即最近硬件安全方面的困境并不是因为缺乏技术解决方案,而是因为市场力量和激励措施阻止了那些有能力解决问题的人这样做。问题的根源在于硬件安全是有代价的;硬件安全中的当前问题可以看作是硬件安全博弈的参与者寻找避免支付这种成本的方法的结果。我们将这一理念形成一种安全原则,即分担责任原则。三个案例研究——rowhammer, Spectre和melt——是通过这一理论的透镜来解释的。我们的学说阐明了这些问题存在的原因和可以采取的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
WaC: A New Doctrine for Hardware Security
In this paper, we promote the idea that recent woes in hardware security are not because of a lack of technical solutions but rather because market forces and incentives prevent those with the ability to fix problems from doing so. At the root of the problem is the fact that hardware security comes at a cost; present issues in hardware security can be seen as the result of the players in the game of hardware security finding ways of avoiding paying this cost. We formulate this idea into a doctrine of security, namely the Doctrine of Shared Burdens. Three cases studies-Rowhammer, Spectre, and Meltdown-are interpreted though the lens of this doctrine. Our doctrine illuminates why these problems exist and what can be done about them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differential Fault Analysis of NORX PRINCE under Differential Fault Attack: Now in 3D Building a Modern TRNG: An Entropy Source Interface for RISC-V Formidable Challenges in Hardware Implementations of Fully Homomorphic Encryption Functions for Applications in Machine Learning SoK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1