与金融科技公司竞争的银行的贷款损失信号:来自点对点贷款的证据

Jeffrey Ng, T. Rusticus, Janus Jian Zhang
{"title":"与金融科技公司竞争的银行的贷款损失信号:来自点对点贷款的证据","authors":"Jeffrey Ng, T. Rusticus, Janus Jian Zhang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3622854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial technology (FinTech) companies are increasingly important to the financial system. We investigate the effect of peer-to-peer (P2P) lending on traditional banks by examining whether and how P2P lending activity in a state affects loan loss provisions among that state’s commercial banks. When borrowers take out loans from both a bank and a P2P lending platform, they become more leveraged. Banks may signal their anticipation of bad loans due to overleveraged borrowers by increasing their expected future loan losses. Using a large sample of US single-state banks from 2010 to 2018, we find that banks in states with a higher P2P lending volume report higher loan loss provisions. This positive relation is stronger for banks with greater exposure to the consumer loan market and for those with consumer borrowers who are more leveraged. Our findings show that bank managers use loan loss provisions to signal expected credit losses in response to P2P lending. We also find that P2P lending is associated with higher future loan charge-offs, which validates the signaling channel. Overall, our study offers new insight into the interaction between FinTech firms and traditional financial institutions.","PeriodicalId":319022,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Networks eJournal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loan Loss Signaling Among Banks Competing with FinTech Firms: Evidence from Peer-to-Peer Lending\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Ng, T. Rusticus, Janus Jian Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3622854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Financial technology (FinTech) companies are increasingly important to the financial system. We investigate the effect of peer-to-peer (P2P) lending on traditional banks by examining whether and how P2P lending activity in a state affects loan loss provisions among that state’s commercial banks. When borrowers take out loans from both a bank and a P2P lending platform, they become more leveraged. Banks may signal their anticipation of bad loans due to overleveraged borrowers by increasing their expected future loan losses. Using a large sample of US single-state banks from 2010 to 2018, we find that banks in states with a higher P2P lending volume report higher loan loss provisions. This positive relation is stronger for banks with greater exposure to the consumer loan market and for those with consumer borrowers who are more leveraged. Our findings show that bank managers use loan loss provisions to signal expected credit losses in response to P2P lending. We also find that P2P lending is associated with higher future loan charge-offs, which validates the signaling channel. Overall, our study offers new insight into the interaction between FinTech firms and traditional financial institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Networks eJournal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Networks eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3622854\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Networks eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3622854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

金融科技(FinTech)公司对金融体系的重要性越来越大。我们通过考察一个州的P2P借贷活动是否以及如何影响该州商业银行的贷款损失准备金,来调查P2P借贷对传统银行的影响。当借款人同时从银行和P2P借贷平台贷款时,他们的杠杆率会更高。银行可能会通过增加预期的未来贷款损失来表明他们对过度杠杆化借款人的不良贷款的预期。使用2010年至2018年美国单一州银行的大样本,我们发现P2P贷款量较高的州的银行报告的贷款损失准备金较高。对于消费贷款市场敞口较大的银行和杠杆率较高的消费者借款人而言,这种正相关关系更为明显。我们的研究结果表明,银行经理使用贷款损失准备金来表明P2P借贷的预期信贷损失。我们还发现P2P借贷与更高的未来贷款冲销有关,这验证了信号通道。总的来说,我们的研究为金融科技公司和传统金融机构之间的互动提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Loan Loss Signaling Among Banks Competing with FinTech Firms: Evidence from Peer-to-Peer Lending
Financial technology (FinTech) companies are increasingly important to the financial system. We investigate the effect of peer-to-peer (P2P) lending on traditional banks by examining whether and how P2P lending activity in a state affects loan loss provisions among that state’s commercial banks. When borrowers take out loans from both a bank and a P2P lending platform, they become more leveraged. Banks may signal their anticipation of bad loans due to overleveraged borrowers by increasing their expected future loan losses. Using a large sample of US single-state banks from 2010 to 2018, we find that banks in states with a higher P2P lending volume report higher loan loss provisions. This positive relation is stronger for banks with greater exposure to the consumer loan market and for those with consumer borrowers who are more leveraged. Our findings show that bank managers use loan loss provisions to signal expected credit losses in response to P2P lending. We also find that P2P lending is associated with higher future loan charge-offs, which validates the signaling channel. Overall, our study offers new insight into the interaction between FinTech firms and traditional financial institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Education-Occupation Mismatch and Social Networks for Hispanics in the US: Role of Citizenship Monitoring Network Changes in Social Media Platform Liability and Innovation The Bipartisan Case for Labeling as a Content Moderation Method: Findings from a National Survey Dealer Networks and the Cost of Immediacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1