5分钟RV在加密货币市场中表现优于其他已实现指标吗?

Takahiro Hattori
{"title":"5分钟RV在加密货币市场中表现优于其他已实现指标吗?","authors":"Takahiro Hattori","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3416106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the seminal work of Liu et al. (2015) finds that the realized volatility (RV) using 5-minute intervals performs well, economists tend to use this simple measure in applications. Existing literature in the cryptocurrency already relies on 5-minute RV, but no paper has evaluated whether 5-minute RV performs well compared with other realized measures. Following Liu et al. (2015), we show that the 5-minute RV of Bitcoin performs well compared to other realized measures, meaning that this result justifies the existing literature that already uses this simple measure. This paper also indicates that realized measures with longer intervals such as 120-minute RV could provide inaccurate estimates.","PeriodicalId":126646,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Exchange Rates & Currency (International) (Topic)","volume":"11 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does 5-Minute RV Outperform Other Realized Measures in the Cryptocurrency Market?\",\"authors\":\"Takahiro Hattori\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3416106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After the seminal work of Liu et al. (2015) finds that the realized volatility (RV) using 5-minute intervals performs well, economists tend to use this simple measure in applications. Existing literature in the cryptocurrency already relies on 5-minute RV, but no paper has evaluated whether 5-minute RV performs well compared with other realized measures. Following Liu et al. (2015), we show that the 5-minute RV of Bitcoin performs well compared to other realized measures, meaning that this result justifies the existing literature that already uses this simple measure. This paper also indicates that realized measures with longer intervals such as 120-minute RV could provide inaccurate estimates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Exchange Rates & Currency (International) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"11 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Exchange Rates & Currency (International) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3416106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Exchange Rates & Currency (International) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3416106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

Liu et al.(2015)的开创性工作发现使用5分钟间隔的实现波动率(RV)表现良好后,经济学家倾向于在应用中使用这种简单的度量。加密货币的现有文献已经依赖于5分钟RV,但没有论文评估5分钟RV与其他已实现的措施相比是否表现良好。继Liu et al.(2015)之后,我们表明比特币的5分钟RV与其他实现的度量相比表现良好,这意味着这一结果证明了已经使用这种简单度量的现有文献是正确的。本文还指出,采用较长间隔(如120分钟RV)实现的度量可能提供不准确的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does 5-Minute RV Outperform Other Realized Measures in the Cryptocurrency Market?
After the seminal work of Liu et al. (2015) finds that the realized volatility (RV) using 5-minute intervals performs well, economists tend to use this simple measure in applications. Existing literature in the cryptocurrency already relies on 5-minute RV, but no paper has evaluated whether 5-minute RV performs well compared with other realized measures. Following Liu et al. (2015), we show that the 5-minute RV of Bitcoin performs well compared to other realized measures, meaning that this result justifies the existing literature that already uses this simple measure. This paper also indicates that realized measures with longer intervals such as 120-minute RV could provide inaccurate estimates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does the speculative frenzy in bitcoin spread to the stock market? When Early Adopters Learn From the Followers: The Cryptocurrency Return Predictability of GBTC Discount and Premium A Decade of Cryptocurrency ‘Hacks’: 2011 – 2021 Risk Analysis of Cryptocurrency Index of the Cycle of Money - The Case of Greece
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1