演绎逻辑与归纳逻辑的和解

Bull. IGPL Pub Date : 1994-09-01 DOI:10.1093/jigpal/2.2.149
D. Gillies
{"title":"演绎逻辑与归纳逻辑的和解","authors":"D. Gillies","doi":"10.1093/jigpal/2.2.149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally logic was considered as having two branches: deductive and inductive. However the development of the subject from Frege (1879) up to about 1970 brought about a divergence between deductive and inductive logic. It is argued in this paper that developments in artiicial intelligence in the last twenty or so years (particularly logic programming and machine learning) have created a new framework for logic in which deductive and inductive logic can, once again, be treated as similar branches of the same discipline.","PeriodicalId":267129,"journal":{"name":"Bull. IGPL","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Rapprochement between Deductive and Inductive Logic\",\"authors\":\"D. Gillies\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jigpal/2.2.149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditionally logic was considered as having two branches: deductive and inductive. However the development of the subject from Frege (1879) up to about 1970 brought about a divergence between deductive and inductive logic. It is argued in this paper that developments in artiicial intelligence in the last twenty or so years (particularly logic programming and machine learning) have created a new framework for logic in which deductive and inductive logic can, once again, be treated as similar branches of the same discipline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bull. IGPL\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bull. IGPL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/2.2.149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bull. IGPL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/2.2.149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

传统上认为逻辑有两个分支:演绎和归纳。然而,从弗雷格(1879)到1970年左右,这一学科的发展带来了演绎逻辑和归纳逻辑之间的分歧。本文认为,人工智能在过去二十年左右的发展(特别是逻辑编程和机器学习)已经为逻辑创造了一个新的框架,演绎逻辑和归纳逻辑可以再次被视为同一学科的类似分支。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Rapprochement between Deductive and Inductive Logic
Traditionally logic was considered as having two branches: deductive and inductive. However the development of the subject from Frege (1879) up to about 1970 brought about a divergence between deductive and inductive logic. It is argued in this paper that developments in artiicial intelligence in the last twenty or so years (particularly logic programming and machine learning) have created a new framework for logic in which deductive and inductive logic can, once again, be treated as similar branches of the same discipline.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Rapprochement between Deductive and Inductive Logic A Useful Substructural Logic Applying SLD-resolution to a class of non-Horn logic programs Finite and Rational Tree Constraints On the Computational Intractabilityof Analytic Tableau Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1