带有旋转液体包层的ICF反应堆室

R. Bourque
{"title":"带有旋转液体包层的ICF反应堆室","authors":"R. Bourque","doi":"10.1109/FUSION.1991.218840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is shown that a rotating reactor chamber with a liquid blanket can be designed with sufficient turbulence in the free surface to remove the heat generated by target explosions. Because viscosity, not thermal conductivity, limits heat removal, both lithium-lead and Flibe can be used. Although LiPb has a fairly high rotational stored energy, it translates into a moderate dynamic pressure and thermalized temperature rise. The stored energy in Flibe is quite low and poses no problem. A rough cost estimate shows that the primary reactor components are not very expensive. Flibe has the advantages of low activation and lower atomic number constituents than LiPb, increasing the allowable chamber pressure for heavy ion beam propagation. However, it is a poor heat transfer medium and must rely on higher levels of turbulence than LiPb to avoid overheating of the liquid surface. The LIFE (liner inertial fusion energy) reactor concept appears to be an improvement over the Cascade concept in that granule refurbishing is eliminated, the blanket is self-healing, and heat transfer to the power conversion system is by convection rather than radiation. One disadvantage is the lower operating temperature compared to the ceramic granules in Cascade. Nevertheless, power conversion efficiencies in the 45% range can be expected.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":318951,"journal":{"name":"[Proceedings] The 14th IEEE/NPSS Symposium Fusion Engineering","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ICF reactor chambers with rotating liquid blankets\",\"authors\":\"R. Bourque\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FUSION.1991.218840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is shown that a rotating reactor chamber with a liquid blanket can be designed with sufficient turbulence in the free surface to remove the heat generated by target explosions. Because viscosity, not thermal conductivity, limits heat removal, both lithium-lead and Flibe can be used. Although LiPb has a fairly high rotational stored energy, it translates into a moderate dynamic pressure and thermalized temperature rise. The stored energy in Flibe is quite low and poses no problem. A rough cost estimate shows that the primary reactor components are not very expensive. Flibe has the advantages of low activation and lower atomic number constituents than LiPb, increasing the allowable chamber pressure for heavy ion beam propagation. However, it is a poor heat transfer medium and must rely on higher levels of turbulence than LiPb to avoid overheating of the liquid surface. The LIFE (liner inertial fusion energy) reactor concept appears to be an improvement over the Cascade concept in that granule refurbishing is eliminated, the blanket is self-healing, and heat transfer to the power conversion system is by convection rather than radiation. One disadvantage is the lower operating temperature compared to the ceramic granules in Cascade. Nevertheless, power conversion efficiencies in the 45% range can be expected.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":318951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[Proceedings] The 14th IEEE/NPSS Symposium Fusion Engineering\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[Proceedings] The 14th IEEE/NPSS Symposium Fusion Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUSION.1991.218840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Proceedings] The 14th IEEE/NPSS Symposium Fusion Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUSION.1991.218840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

结果表明,可以设计一种带有液体包层的旋转反应器室,使其自由表面具有足够的湍流,以消除靶爆炸产生的热量。因为粘度,而不是导热性,限制了热量的排出,所以锂铅和Flibe都可以使用。虽然LiPb具有相当高的旋转存储能量,但它转化为适度的动压和热化温升。Flibe储存的能量很低,不会造成任何问题。粗略的成本估算表明,主反应堆组件并不十分昂贵。Flibe比LiPb具有低活化和低原子序数的优点,增加了重离子束传播的允许腔压。然而,它是一种差的传热介质,必须依靠比LiPb更高的湍流水平来避免液体表面过热。LIFE(线性惯性聚变能)反应堆概念似乎是对Cascade概念的改进,因为它消除了颗粒翻新,毯层可以自我修复,并且通过对流而不是辐射将热量传递到功率转换系统。一个缺点是与Cascade中的陶瓷颗粒相比,操作温度较低。然而,功率转换效率可以达到45%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ICF reactor chambers with rotating liquid blankets
It is shown that a rotating reactor chamber with a liquid blanket can be designed with sufficient turbulence in the free surface to remove the heat generated by target explosions. Because viscosity, not thermal conductivity, limits heat removal, both lithium-lead and Flibe can be used. Although LiPb has a fairly high rotational stored energy, it translates into a moderate dynamic pressure and thermalized temperature rise. The stored energy in Flibe is quite low and poses no problem. A rough cost estimate shows that the primary reactor components are not very expensive. Flibe has the advantages of low activation and lower atomic number constituents than LiPb, increasing the allowable chamber pressure for heavy ion beam propagation. However, it is a poor heat transfer medium and must rely on higher levels of turbulence than LiPb to avoid overheating of the liquid surface. The LIFE (liner inertial fusion energy) reactor concept appears to be an improvement over the Cascade concept in that granule refurbishing is eliminated, the blanket is self-healing, and heat transfer to the power conversion system is by convection rather than radiation. One disadvantage is the lower operating temperature compared to the ceramic granules in Cascade. Nevertheless, power conversion efficiencies in the 45% range can be expected.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design of a coil to correct magnetic field errors on the DIII-D tokamak The charge exchange recombination diagnostic system on the DIII-D tokamak Software upgrade for the DIII-D neutral beam control systems Timing system for neutral beam injection on the DIII-D tokamak DIII-D radiation shielding procedures and experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1