革命与改革之间的古巴教育

Danay Quintana Nedelcu
{"title":"革命与改革之间的古巴教育","authors":"Danay Quintana Nedelcu","doi":"10.13169/INTEJCUBASTUD.6.2.0205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionA reflection on the challenges facing public universities leads us to a theme (among many) of the centrality of the social sciences: how far should the state be, desired to be or actually be responsible for education in a country? Can direct government involvement produce favourable results in solving the educational problem? The analysis of the role of education cannot be done without a reflection about the State, the development models that are driven by this structure, the power groups that give it meaning, the kind of society that results and a holistic view of public policies (Del Castillo 2014) that serves as a tool (in a double sense) of governments to solve public problems that they themselves have defined in a (desired) dialogue with society. Just as it is essential to understand the State to analyse education, education also 'talks' about the kind of state and society in which it occurs.Education as a public issue is an idea as old as ancient Greece. Since then the state has been defined as the entity that is ultimately responsible for the formation of the citizens in the polis: the meaning of the State is, in its superior essence, the Paideia1 (Werner 1971). From this statement we return to the political status of (public) education.The debates on education as a public issue have transcended the field of research. They also exceed domestic politics, standing on the top of the global agenda. Today we find tensions between the models proposed by governments (pressured by international organisations) and those desired by society which have led to a climate of direct confrontation. We see examples of this everywhere: in the US and its most recent reform of the public school system, the education reforms passed in Mexico, the protests in the university student movement of Chile, the strike of teachers in Brazil, controversial university reform in Ecuador in recent years and the university student movement unleashed in Colombia in 2011 are a few of the flashpoints that demonstrate the social dynamics around the problems facing the education sector in general and universities in particular.The consequences of the neoliberal educational model (Gentili 1996; Puiggros 1996) have challenged the assumed direct link between education and development, although the World Bank insists on it (Banco Mundial 2012) and unresolved social problems in the Latin American region such as poverty, inequality and inequity (Blanco, 2012; Gajardo 2012) only serve to trigger deep crises in the current paradigms of the social function of education and what it implies: the confrontation between reality and utopia.Immersed in this scenario, the Cuban case is symptomatic of a different situation, though not without its own tensions. In recent years, the government and Cuban society have been involved in a major process of change: according to many, the most important in the last 50 years. The changes are projected in the Guidelines of the Economic and Social Policy of the Party and the Revolution (adopted at the Sixth Congress of the Communist Party of Cuba 2011 and ratified by the National Assembly of Popular Power in the same year ) and include new directions for the economy, labour policies, taxation, immigration and education, among others. They are an expression of a macro-policy discourse that presents us with the aim of streamlining the national economy, in the interests of improving the Cuban socialist system, by making it prosperous and sustainable. According to the government, we are facing an updating of the economic model, but without political changes,2 so that the two main axes of the current reforms are aimed, first, to implement measures aimed at improving national economic efficiency and, second, to support and strengthen the historical ideological precepts of the Cuban Revolution, most emphatically through education.Within the package of proposed reforms, one of the routes of change designed by the government relates to education, specifically in universities. …","PeriodicalId":254309,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Cuban Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cuban Education between Revolution and Reform\",\"authors\":\"Danay Quintana Nedelcu\",\"doi\":\"10.13169/INTEJCUBASTUD.6.2.0205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionA reflection on the challenges facing public universities leads us to a theme (among many) of the centrality of the social sciences: how far should the state be, desired to be or actually be responsible for education in a country? Can direct government involvement produce favourable results in solving the educational problem? The analysis of the role of education cannot be done without a reflection about the State, the development models that are driven by this structure, the power groups that give it meaning, the kind of society that results and a holistic view of public policies (Del Castillo 2014) that serves as a tool (in a double sense) of governments to solve public problems that they themselves have defined in a (desired) dialogue with society. Just as it is essential to understand the State to analyse education, education also 'talks' about the kind of state and society in which it occurs.Education as a public issue is an idea as old as ancient Greece. Since then the state has been defined as the entity that is ultimately responsible for the formation of the citizens in the polis: the meaning of the State is, in its superior essence, the Paideia1 (Werner 1971). From this statement we return to the political status of (public) education.The debates on education as a public issue have transcended the field of research. They also exceed domestic politics, standing on the top of the global agenda. Today we find tensions between the models proposed by governments (pressured by international organisations) and those desired by society which have led to a climate of direct confrontation. We see examples of this everywhere: in the US and its most recent reform of the public school system, the education reforms passed in Mexico, the protests in the university student movement of Chile, the strike of teachers in Brazil, controversial university reform in Ecuador in recent years and the university student movement unleashed in Colombia in 2011 are a few of the flashpoints that demonstrate the social dynamics around the problems facing the education sector in general and universities in particular.The consequences of the neoliberal educational model (Gentili 1996; Puiggros 1996) have challenged the assumed direct link between education and development, although the World Bank insists on it (Banco Mundial 2012) and unresolved social problems in the Latin American region such as poverty, inequality and inequity (Blanco, 2012; Gajardo 2012) only serve to trigger deep crises in the current paradigms of the social function of education and what it implies: the confrontation between reality and utopia.Immersed in this scenario, the Cuban case is symptomatic of a different situation, though not without its own tensions. In recent years, the government and Cuban society have been involved in a major process of change: according to many, the most important in the last 50 years. The changes are projected in the Guidelines of the Economic and Social Policy of the Party and the Revolution (adopted at the Sixth Congress of the Communist Party of Cuba 2011 and ratified by the National Assembly of Popular Power in the same year ) and include new directions for the economy, labour policies, taxation, immigration and education, among others. They are an expression of a macro-policy discourse that presents us with the aim of streamlining the national economy, in the interests of improving the Cuban socialist system, by making it prosperous and sustainable. According to the government, we are facing an updating of the economic model, but without political changes,2 so that the two main axes of the current reforms are aimed, first, to implement measures aimed at improving national economic efficiency and, second, to support and strengthen the historical ideological precepts of the Cuban Revolution, most emphatically through education.Within the package of proposed reforms, one of the routes of change designed by the government relates to education, specifically in universities. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":254309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Cuban Studies\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Cuban Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13169/INTEJCUBASTUD.6.2.0205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Cuban Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/INTEJCUBASTUD.6.2.0205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对公立大学所面临的挑战的反思将我们引向社会科学中心的一个主题(在许多主题中):国家应该在多大程度上、希望在多大程度上或实际上在多大程度上负责一个国家的教育?政府直接参与能在解决教育问题上产生有利的结果吗?要分析教育的作用,就必须反思国家、由这种结构驱动的发展模式、赋予其意义的权力集团、由此产生的社会类型,以及公共政策的整体观点(Del Castillo 2014),后者是政府(在双重意义上)解决公共问题的工具,而这些问题是政府自己在与社会(期望的)对话中定义的。正如理解国家对分析教育至关重要一样,教育也“谈论”它所发生的国家和社会的类型。教育作为一个公共问题是一个和古希腊一样古老的想法。从那时起,国家被定义为最终负责城邦中公民形成的实体:国家的意义在其高级本质上是paidei1 (Werner 1971)。从这句话我们回到(公共)教育的政治地位。关于教育作为一个公共问题的争论已经超越了研究领域。它们也超越了国内政治,站在了全球议程的首位。今天,我们发现政府(在国际组织的压力下)提出的模式与社会所期望的模式之间存在紧张关系,这导致了直接对抗的气氛。这样的例子随处可见:美国及其最近的公立学校系统改革、墨西哥通过的教育改革、智利大学生运动的抗议、巴西教师的罢工、厄瓜多尔近年来有争议的大学改革,以及2011年哥伦比亚爆发的大学生运动,这些都是一些爆发点,表明围绕教育部门,特别是大学所面临的问题的社会动态。新自由主义教育模式的后果(Gentili 1996;Puiggros 1996)挑战了假定的教育与发展之间的直接联系,尽管世界银行坚持认为(Banco Mundial 2012)和拉丁美洲地区未解决的社会问题,如贫困,不平等和不公平(Blanco, 2012;Gajardo 2012)只会引发当前教育社会功能范式的深刻危机,以及它所暗示的:现实与乌托邦之间的对抗。在这种情况下,古巴的情况是另一种情况的症状,尽管并非没有其本身的紧张局势。近年来,古巴政府和社会参与了一场重大变革:许多人认为,这是过去50年来最重要的变革。这些变化是在《党和革命的经济和社会政策指导方针》(2011年古巴共产党第六次代表大会通过,同年由人民权力全国议会批准)中预测的,其中包括经济,劳工政策,税收,移民和教育等方面的新方向。它们是一种宏观政策话语的表现,它向我们提出了精简国民经济的目标,以便通过使古巴社会主义制度繁荣和可持续来改进它。根据政府的说法,我们正面临着经济模式的更新,但没有政治变革,2因此,当前改革的两个主要轴线旨在,第一,实施旨在提高国家经济效率的措施,第二,支持和加强古巴革命的历史意识形态戒律,最强调的是通过教育。在一揽子改革方案中,政府设计的改革路线之一与教育有关,特别是在大学。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cuban Education between Revolution and Reform
IntroductionA reflection on the challenges facing public universities leads us to a theme (among many) of the centrality of the social sciences: how far should the state be, desired to be or actually be responsible for education in a country? Can direct government involvement produce favourable results in solving the educational problem? The analysis of the role of education cannot be done without a reflection about the State, the development models that are driven by this structure, the power groups that give it meaning, the kind of society that results and a holistic view of public policies (Del Castillo 2014) that serves as a tool (in a double sense) of governments to solve public problems that they themselves have defined in a (desired) dialogue with society. Just as it is essential to understand the State to analyse education, education also 'talks' about the kind of state and society in which it occurs.Education as a public issue is an idea as old as ancient Greece. Since then the state has been defined as the entity that is ultimately responsible for the formation of the citizens in the polis: the meaning of the State is, in its superior essence, the Paideia1 (Werner 1971). From this statement we return to the political status of (public) education.The debates on education as a public issue have transcended the field of research. They also exceed domestic politics, standing on the top of the global agenda. Today we find tensions between the models proposed by governments (pressured by international organisations) and those desired by society which have led to a climate of direct confrontation. We see examples of this everywhere: in the US and its most recent reform of the public school system, the education reforms passed in Mexico, the protests in the university student movement of Chile, the strike of teachers in Brazil, controversial university reform in Ecuador in recent years and the university student movement unleashed in Colombia in 2011 are a few of the flashpoints that demonstrate the social dynamics around the problems facing the education sector in general and universities in particular.The consequences of the neoliberal educational model (Gentili 1996; Puiggros 1996) have challenged the assumed direct link between education and development, although the World Bank insists on it (Banco Mundial 2012) and unresolved social problems in the Latin American region such as poverty, inequality and inequity (Blanco, 2012; Gajardo 2012) only serve to trigger deep crises in the current paradigms of the social function of education and what it implies: the confrontation between reality and utopia.Immersed in this scenario, the Cuban case is symptomatic of a different situation, though not without its own tensions. In recent years, the government and Cuban society have been involved in a major process of change: according to many, the most important in the last 50 years. The changes are projected in the Guidelines of the Economic and Social Policy of the Party and the Revolution (adopted at the Sixth Congress of the Communist Party of Cuba 2011 and ratified by the National Assembly of Popular Power in the same year ) and include new directions for the economy, labour policies, taxation, immigration and education, among others. They are an expression of a macro-policy discourse that presents us with the aim of streamlining the national economy, in the interests of improving the Cuban socialist system, by making it prosperous and sustainable. According to the government, we are facing an updating of the economic model, but without political changes,2 so that the two main axes of the current reforms are aimed, first, to implement measures aimed at improving national economic efficiency and, second, to support and strengthen the historical ideological precepts of the Cuban Revolution, most emphatically through education.Within the package of proposed reforms, one of the routes of change designed by the government relates to education, specifically in universities. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Submission guidelines Cuban cinema, crisis or transition? Negotiating a cultural tightrope El Fracaso De Las Compañías De Seguros De Esclavos: Cuba a Partir De la Experiencia Norteamericana Cuba: Plus ça Change? Dangerous Marielitos: Wisconsin Newspapers and the Proliferation of a Negative Representation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1