{"title":"边界系统的另一种选择","authors":"W. Knight","doi":"10.1145/37523.37526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This partitioned system, [EQUATION] is to be solved many times with the same n by n matrix, A, but differing n-vectors, b, c, and f, and differing scalars d and g. By using a bordering algorithm, A need be inverted once only. The remaining computation, done often, uses 2n2+3n+constant long operations (multiplications + divisions). Govaerts and Pryce (1987) consider the situation when A is nearly singular although (1) itself is well conditioned, reporting that using a bordering computation followed by iterative refinement of the initial poor solution works well, being both simple and practical.","PeriodicalId":177516,"journal":{"name":"ACM Signum Newsletter","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Another alternative for bordered systems\",\"authors\":\"W. Knight\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/37523.37526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This partitioned system, [EQUATION] is to be solved many times with the same n by n matrix, A, but differing n-vectors, b, c, and f, and differing scalars d and g. By using a bordering algorithm, A need be inverted once only. The remaining computation, done often, uses 2n2+3n+constant long operations (multiplications + divisions). Govaerts and Pryce (1987) consider the situation when A is nearly singular although (1) itself is well conditioned, reporting that using a bordering computation followed by iterative refinement of the initial poor solution works well, being both simple and practical.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Signum Newsletter\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Signum Newsletter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/37523.37526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Signum Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/37523.37526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This partitioned system, [EQUATION] is to be solved many times with the same n by n matrix, A, but differing n-vectors, b, c, and f, and differing scalars d and g. By using a bordering algorithm, A need be inverted once only. The remaining computation, done often, uses 2n2+3n+constant long operations (multiplications + divisions). Govaerts and Pryce (1987) consider the situation when A is nearly singular although (1) itself is well conditioned, reporting that using a bordering computation followed by iterative refinement of the initial poor solution works well, being both simple and practical.