航空航天初步设计的统计时间和市场预测工程设计技术:区域涡轮螺旋桨应用

R. Barrett
{"title":"航空航天初步设计的统计时间和市场预测工程设计技术:区域涡轮螺旋桨应用","authors":"R. Barrett","doi":"10.4172/2168-9792.1000135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As aircraft design techniques become more and more automated with greater numbers of more powerful computational machines becoming available, exacting approaches like “knowledge based design” and “knowledge based engineering” (KBE) are becoming quite commonplace. Indeed, the field of KBE has roots stretching back many decades [1-3]. These KBE tools have in the past decade been systematically moved from detailed component design towards the arena of preliminary aircraft design [3-6]. While KBE and other computational tools are compatible with structural optimization with highly defined loads and operational conditions, such techniques are fundamentally challenged when loads are ill defined or when highly nonlinear factors are included. Another issue challenging such tools as they are being integrated into preliminary design is that they highlight a “computational mismatch” in that expensive, computationally costly methods are being used to arrive at the third and fourth significant figure of aircraft weights, when in preliminary design, only two are generally needed or appropriate for the task at hand.","PeriodicalId":356774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aeronautics and Aerospace Engineering","volume":"577 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical Time and Market Predictive Engineering Design (STAMPED) Techniques for Aerospace Preliminary Design: Regional TurbopropApplication\",\"authors\":\"R. Barrett\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2168-9792.1000135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As aircraft design techniques become more and more automated with greater numbers of more powerful computational machines becoming available, exacting approaches like “knowledge based design” and “knowledge based engineering” (KBE) are becoming quite commonplace. Indeed, the field of KBE has roots stretching back many decades [1-3]. These KBE tools have in the past decade been systematically moved from detailed component design towards the arena of preliminary aircraft design [3-6]. While KBE and other computational tools are compatible with structural optimization with highly defined loads and operational conditions, such techniques are fundamentally challenged when loads are ill defined or when highly nonlinear factors are included. Another issue challenging such tools as they are being integrated into preliminary design is that they highlight a “computational mismatch” in that expensive, computationally costly methods are being used to arrive at the third and fourth significant figure of aircraft weights, when in preliminary design, only two are generally needed or appropriate for the task at hand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aeronautics and Aerospace Engineering\",\"volume\":\"577 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aeronautics and Aerospace Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9792.1000135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aeronautics and Aerospace Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9792.1000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

随着飞机设计技术变得越来越自动化,越来越多的更强大的计算机器变得可用,像“基于知识的设计”和“基于知识的工程”(KBE)这样的精确方法变得相当普遍。事实上,KBE领域的根源可以追溯到几十年前[1-3]。在过去的十年中,这些KBE工具已经从详细部件设计系统地转移到飞机初步设计领域[3-6]。虽然KBE和其他计算工具与高度定义的载荷和操作条件下的结构优化兼容,但当载荷定义不清或包含高度非线性因素时,这些技术从根本上受到挑战。另一个挑战这些工具的问题是,当它们被整合到初步设计中时,它们突出了“计算不匹配”,即使用昂贵的计算成本高昂的方法来获得飞机重量的第三和第四个重要数字,而在初步设计中,通常只需要两个或适合手头的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Statistical Time and Market Predictive Engineering Design (STAMPED) Techniques for Aerospace Preliminary Design: Regional TurbopropApplication
As aircraft design techniques become more and more automated with greater numbers of more powerful computational machines becoming available, exacting approaches like “knowledge based design” and “knowledge based engineering” (KBE) are becoming quite commonplace. Indeed, the field of KBE has roots stretching back many decades [1-3]. These KBE tools have in the past decade been systematically moved from detailed component design towards the arena of preliminary aircraft design [3-6]. While KBE and other computational tools are compatible with structural optimization with highly defined loads and operational conditions, such techniques are fundamentally challenged when loads are ill defined or when highly nonlinear factors are included. Another issue challenging such tools as they are being integrated into preliminary design is that they highlight a “computational mismatch” in that expensive, computationally costly methods are being used to arrive at the third and fourth significant figure of aircraft weights, when in preliminary design, only two are generally needed or appropriate for the task at hand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mechanical Behavior of a Fuselage Stiffened Carbon-Epoxy Panel under Debonding Load On the Modeling of Light Aircraft Landing Gears Various aspects of situation awareness with respect to human-machine-interaction while using optoavionic cockpit instrumentation in aircraft Autopilot Design of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle A New Methodology for Aerodynamic Design and Analysis of a Small Scale Blended Wing Body
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1