关于在不明确概念的情况下开发度量的危险[软件度量]

F. Xia
{"title":"关于在不明确概念的情况下开发度量的危险[软件度量]","authors":"F. Xia","doi":"10.1109/APSEC.1998.733594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Defining concept before developing theory must be a fundamental requirement of any science. We show that this requirement, though seemingly trivial, is to a large extent not respected in software measurement research. Many basic software quality concepts are used ambiguously without a clear definition and consequently their measures, though growing in number, have no serious scientific foundation and risk being misleading in further research. We demonstrate the differences between concept and measure, show the risks to develop measures without clarifying concepts, and underline the paramount importance of concept clarification and definition for the development of software measures.","PeriodicalId":296589,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1998 Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference (Cat. No.98EX240)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the danger of developing measures without clarifying concepts [software measurement]\",\"authors\":\"F. Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSEC.1998.733594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Defining concept before developing theory must be a fundamental requirement of any science. We show that this requirement, though seemingly trivial, is to a large extent not respected in software measurement research. Many basic software quality concepts are used ambiguously without a clear definition and consequently their measures, though growing in number, have no serious scientific foundation and risk being misleading in further research. We demonstrate the differences between concept and measure, show the risks to develop measures without clarifying concepts, and underline the paramount importance of concept clarification and definition for the development of software measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 1998 Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference (Cat. No.98EX240)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 1998 Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference (Cat. No.98EX240)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.1998.733594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1998 Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference (Cat. No.98EX240)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.1998.733594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在发展理论之前定义概念必须是任何科学的基本要求。我们表明,这个需求,虽然看起来微不足道,但在很大程度上在软件度量研究中是不受尊重的。许多基本的软件质量概念在没有明确定义的情况下被含糊地使用,因此它们的度量虽然在数量上不断增长,但没有严肃的科学基础,并且有在进一步研究中被误导的风险。我们展示了概念和度量之间的差异,展示了在没有澄清概念的情况下开发度量的风险,并强调了概念澄清和定义对于软件度量开发的最高重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the danger of developing measures without clarifying concepts [software measurement]
Defining concept before developing theory must be a fundamental requirement of any science. We show that this requirement, though seemingly trivial, is to a large extent not respected in software measurement research. Many basic software quality concepts are used ambiguously without a clear definition and consequently their measures, though growing in number, have no serious scientific foundation and risk being misleading in further research. We demonstrate the differences between concept and measure, show the risks to develop measures without clarifying concepts, and underline the paramount importance of concept clarification and definition for the development of software measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A difference-based version model for OODBMS CSMonitor: a visual client/server monitor for CORBA-based distributed applications Component and data distribution in a distributed workflow A computing model for distributed processing systems and its application Why is it so hard to define software architecture?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1