论刑事诉讼中证据收集的内容、结构和概念:程序学和刑法学

A. Holubov
{"title":"论刑事诉讼中证据收集的内容、结构和概念:程序学和刑法学","authors":"A. Holubov","doi":"10.33251/2707-8620-2021-5-156-162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The purpose of the conducted research is to clarify the content, role and structure of collecting activities. Despite the fact that these issues were covered in a number of scientific papers, but there was still no unity of positions on them in the legal literature. The research methods are to generalize the positions of legal scholars on the essence of collecting evidence, its structure and components, as well as the analysis of practical activities on collecting evidence, which is regulated by the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine. The results of the research are that the collection of evidence in criminal proceedings should be considered as a separate and independent element of criminal procedural activity on proving. It has been established that the collection of evidence is carried out in a procedural form (clearly defined procedure and methods of implementation) due to the accomplishment by the subjects of proving (prosecution and defense parties) of the relevant actions. The structure of the activity on collecting evidence has been offered to include actions on detecting and recording, demanding and obtaining and preserving evidence. It has been determined that the collection of evidence contributes to the fulfillment of the tasks of criminal proceedings due to the creation of conditions for the formation of a sufficient set of relevant, admissible and reliable evidence. The author of the article has paid attention to the fact that different approaches � \"procedural\" (the emphasis on procedural manifestations of this activity, subjects of proving, regulation by the norms of procedural law) and \"forensic\" (the emphasis on practical actions � elements of collecting evidence) are used in the science of criminal procedure and criminalistics science while defining the concept of \"collection of evidence\". Although, both approaches are somewhat different from each other, they describe the same phenomenon. Therefore, it is advisable to combine these approaches in order to understand the collection of evidence from the methodological point of view. The results of the research facilitate to specify theoretical structure of collecting evidence within criminal proceedings as a separate element of proving. Proper, clear and comprehensive legal regulation of the content of actions on collecting evidence will contribute to the further development of criminal judicial proceedings in Ukraine as an effective mean of protecting individuals, society and the state from criminal offenses. Key words: criminal procedure, proving, detention of evidence, evidence recording, obtaining evidence, evidence preservation, collection of evidence, evidence, tasks of criminal proceedings.","PeriodicalId":414547,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Bulletin of Flight Academy. Section: Economics, Management and Law","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regarding the content, structure and concept of evidence collection in criminal proceedings: procedural and criminalistics aspects\",\"authors\":\"A. Holubov\",\"doi\":\"10.33251/2707-8620-2021-5-156-162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The purpose of the conducted research is to clarify the content, role and structure of collecting activities. Despite the fact that these issues were covered in a number of scientific papers, but there was still no unity of positions on them in the legal literature. The research methods are to generalize the positions of legal scholars on the essence of collecting evidence, its structure and components, as well as the analysis of practical activities on collecting evidence, which is regulated by the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine. The results of the research are that the collection of evidence in criminal proceedings should be considered as a separate and independent element of criminal procedural activity on proving. It has been established that the collection of evidence is carried out in a procedural form (clearly defined procedure and methods of implementation) due to the accomplishment by the subjects of proving (prosecution and defense parties) of the relevant actions. The structure of the activity on collecting evidence has been offered to include actions on detecting and recording, demanding and obtaining and preserving evidence. It has been determined that the collection of evidence contributes to the fulfillment of the tasks of criminal proceedings due to the creation of conditions for the formation of a sufficient set of relevant, admissible and reliable evidence. The author of the article has paid attention to the fact that different approaches � \\\"procedural\\\" (the emphasis on procedural manifestations of this activity, subjects of proving, regulation by the norms of procedural law) and \\\"forensic\\\" (the emphasis on practical actions � elements of collecting evidence) are used in the science of criminal procedure and criminalistics science while defining the concept of \\\"collection of evidence\\\". Although, both approaches are somewhat different from each other, they describe the same phenomenon. Therefore, it is advisable to combine these approaches in order to understand the collection of evidence from the methodological point of view. The results of the research facilitate to specify theoretical structure of collecting evidence within criminal proceedings as a separate element of proving. Proper, clear and comprehensive legal regulation of the content of actions on collecting evidence will contribute to the further development of criminal judicial proceedings in Ukraine as an effective mean of protecting individuals, society and the state from criminal offenses. Key words: criminal procedure, proving, detention of evidence, evidence recording, obtaining evidence, evidence preservation, collection of evidence, evidence, tasks of criminal proceedings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Bulletin of Flight Academy. Section: Economics, Management and Law\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Bulletin of Flight Academy. Section: Economics, Management and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33251/2707-8620-2021-5-156-162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Bulletin of Flight Academy. Section: Economics, Management and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33251/2707-8620-2021-5-156-162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要进行研究的目的是澄清收集活动的内容、作用和结构。尽管这些问题在许多科学论文中都有涉及,但在法律文献中仍然没有统一的立场。研究方法是总结法律学者对证据收集的本质、证据收集的结构和组成部分的观点,以及对乌克兰刑事诉讼法规定的证据收集实践活动的分析。研究结果表明,刑事诉讼中的证据收集应被视为刑事诉讼举证活动的一个单独和独立的组成部分。已经确定的是,证据的收集是以程序形式(明确规定的程序和执行方法)进行的,因为证明主体(控方和辩方)完成了有关行动。提出了收集证据活动的结构,包括侦查和记录、索取和取得和保存证据的行动。已经确定,证据的收集有助于完成刑事诉讼的任务,因为它为形成一套充分的有关的、可接受的和可靠的证据创造了条件。本文作者在界定“证据收集”概念时,注意到刑事诉讼科学和刑法学采用了不同的方法——“程序性”(强调这一活动的程序表现形式、证明主体、程序法规范的规范)和“法医学”(强调实际行动——收集证据的要素)。虽然这两种方法彼此有些不同,但它们描述的是相同的现象。因此,为了从方法论的角度理解证据的收集,将这些方法结合起来是明智的。研究结果有助于明确刑事诉讼中作为单独证明要素的证据收集的理论结构。对收集证据行动的内容进行适当、明确和全面的法律规定,将有助于进一步发展乌克兰的刑事司法程序,使其成为保护个人、社会和国家免受刑事犯罪侵害的有效手段。关键词:刑事诉讼,证明,证据扣留,证据记录,证据获取,证据保全,证据收集,证据,刑事诉讼任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regarding the content, structure and concept of evidence collection in criminal proceedings: procedural and criminalistics aspects
Abstract. The purpose of the conducted research is to clarify the content, role and structure of collecting activities. Despite the fact that these issues were covered in a number of scientific papers, but there was still no unity of positions on them in the legal literature. The research methods are to generalize the positions of legal scholars on the essence of collecting evidence, its structure and components, as well as the analysis of practical activities on collecting evidence, which is regulated by the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine. The results of the research are that the collection of evidence in criminal proceedings should be considered as a separate and independent element of criminal procedural activity on proving. It has been established that the collection of evidence is carried out in a procedural form (clearly defined procedure and methods of implementation) due to the accomplishment by the subjects of proving (prosecution and defense parties) of the relevant actions. The structure of the activity on collecting evidence has been offered to include actions on detecting and recording, demanding and obtaining and preserving evidence. It has been determined that the collection of evidence contributes to the fulfillment of the tasks of criminal proceedings due to the creation of conditions for the formation of a sufficient set of relevant, admissible and reliable evidence. The author of the article has paid attention to the fact that different approaches � "procedural" (the emphasis on procedural manifestations of this activity, subjects of proving, regulation by the norms of procedural law) and "forensic" (the emphasis on practical actions � elements of collecting evidence) are used in the science of criminal procedure and criminalistics science while defining the concept of "collection of evidence". Although, both approaches are somewhat different from each other, they describe the same phenomenon. Therefore, it is advisable to combine these approaches in order to understand the collection of evidence from the methodological point of view. The results of the research facilitate to specify theoretical structure of collecting evidence within criminal proceedings as a separate element of proving. Proper, clear and comprehensive legal regulation of the content of actions on collecting evidence will contribute to the further development of criminal judicial proceedings in Ukraine as an effective mean of protecting individuals, society and the state from criminal offenses. Key words: criminal procedure, proving, detention of evidence, evidence recording, obtaining evidence, evidence preservation, collection of evidence, evidence, tasks of criminal proceedings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction of electric transport as a way to fight against pollution of the environment Improvement of motivational management technologies based on assessment of professional development and personnel competitiveness The need to assess the effectiveness of the implementation of budget programs in the field of education and science Information security in Ukraine: present state and development prospects Government financial control: problems and prospective areas of improvement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1