监测贫困和收入分配趋势:数据、方法和测量

P. Saunders, B. Bradbury
{"title":"监测贫困和收入分配趋势:数据、方法和测量","authors":"P. Saunders, B. Bradbury","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4932.2006.00344.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Australian research on poverty and income distribution has been subject to criticism over definitional, data quality and measurement issues that have undermined its validity and impact. In reviewing these issues, this paper addresses some of the problems that have been identified in the literature and illustrates their importance with examples that shed light on the validity of the arguments. It also seeks to establish whether poverty has increased or decreased in the decade to 2002-03 and examines the overlap between hardship or deprivation and income poverty, and reviews some of the emerging evidence on the dynamics of low income. After a detailed review of data problems, the significance of definitional issues is illustrated in relation to the measurement of income inequality and poverty. Attention then focuses on assessing the sensitivity of estimated trends in income poverty to how poverty is defined and measured. Although there is variation across the different measures, the evidence suggests that progress in reducing relative poverty has been slow. Our preferred measure (based on current income) suggests that relative poverty increased slightly over the decade, with most of the increase occurring between 1995-96 and 1999-2000. When poverty is measured in 'absolute' terms using a poverty line that is held constant in real terms, the poverty rate declined overall, but was more or less constant between 1996-97 and 2000-01. Estimates derived from wave III of Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) data indicate that those who were income poor in 2002-03 experienced twice as many hardship conditions as those who were not poor, with around one-quarter of the poor having problems paying bills or seeking external financial assistance. HILDA data also indicate that many of those who are in poverty in any single year manage to escape within the next 2 years, although it is too early to know whether they escape permanently, or slip back into poverty or oscillate on its margins. Copyright © 2006 The Economic Society of Australia.","PeriodicalId":346063,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Record","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"92","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring Trends in Poverty and Income Distribution: Data, Methodology and Measurement\",\"authors\":\"P. Saunders, B. Bradbury\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1475-4932.2006.00344.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Australian research on poverty and income distribution has been subject to criticism over definitional, data quality and measurement issues that have undermined its validity and impact. In reviewing these issues, this paper addresses some of the problems that have been identified in the literature and illustrates their importance with examples that shed light on the validity of the arguments. It also seeks to establish whether poverty has increased or decreased in the decade to 2002-03 and examines the overlap between hardship or deprivation and income poverty, and reviews some of the emerging evidence on the dynamics of low income. After a detailed review of data problems, the significance of definitional issues is illustrated in relation to the measurement of income inequality and poverty. Attention then focuses on assessing the sensitivity of estimated trends in income poverty to how poverty is defined and measured. Although there is variation across the different measures, the evidence suggests that progress in reducing relative poverty has been slow. Our preferred measure (based on current income) suggests that relative poverty increased slightly over the decade, with most of the increase occurring between 1995-96 and 1999-2000. When poverty is measured in 'absolute' terms using a poverty line that is held constant in real terms, the poverty rate declined overall, but was more or less constant between 1996-97 and 2000-01. Estimates derived from wave III of Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) data indicate that those who were income poor in 2002-03 experienced twice as many hardship conditions as those who were not poor, with around one-quarter of the poor having problems paying bills or seeking external financial assistance. HILDA data also indicate that many of those who are in poverty in any single year manage to escape within the next 2 years, although it is too early to know whether they escape permanently, or slip back into poverty or oscillate on its margins. Copyright © 2006 The Economic Society of Australia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Record\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"92\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2006.00344.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2006.00344.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 92

摘要

澳大利亚关于贫困和收入分配的研究在定义、数据质量和测量问题上一直受到批评,这些问题削弱了其有效性和影响。在回顾这些问题时,本文解决了一些已经在文献中发现的问题,并举例说明了它们的重要性,阐明了论点的有效性。它还试图确定在截至2002- 2003年的十年中贫困是增加了还是减少了,并审查了困难或剥夺与收入贫困之间的重叠,并审查了有关低收入动态的一些新证据。在详细审查了数据问题之后,说明了与衡量收入不平等和贫穷有关的定义问题的重要性。然后,注意力集中于评估收入贫穷估计趋势对如何界定和衡量贫穷的敏感性。尽管不同的衡量标准存在差异,但有证据表明,减少相对贫困的进展一直很缓慢。我们首选的衡量标准(基于当前收入)表明,相对贫困在过去十年中略有增加,其中大部分增长发生在1995-96年和1999-2000年之间。当使用实际不变的贫困线以“绝对”方式衡量贫困时,贫困率总体下降,但在1996-97年和2000-01年之间基本保持不变。来自澳大利亚家庭收入和劳动力动态(HILDA)第三波数据的估计表明,2002-03年收入贫困的人经历的困难条件是那些不贫困的人的两倍,大约四分之一的穷人在支付账单或寻求外部财政援助方面存在问题。HILDA的数据还表明,在任何一年处于贫困状态的人中,有许多人设法在未来两年内摆脱贫困,尽管现在判断他们是永久摆脱贫困,还是重新陷入贫困或在贫困边缘徘徊还为时过早。版权所有©2006澳大利亚经济学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monitoring Trends in Poverty and Income Distribution: Data, Methodology and Measurement
Australian research on poverty and income distribution has been subject to criticism over definitional, data quality and measurement issues that have undermined its validity and impact. In reviewing these issues, this paper addresses some of the problems that have been identified in the literature and illustrates their importance with examples that shed light on the validity of the arguments. It also seeks to establish whether poverty has increased or decreased in the decade to 2002-03 and examines the overlap between hardship or deprivation and income poverty, and reviews some of the emerging evidence on the dynamics of low income. After a detailed review of data problems, the significance of definitional issues is illustrated in relation to the measurement of income inequality and poverty. Attention then focuses on assessing the sensitivity of estimated trends in income poverty to how poverty is defined and measured. Although there is variation across the different measures, the evidence suggests that progress in reducing relative poverty has been slow. Our preferred measure (based on current income) suggests that relative poverty increased slightly over the decade, with most of the increase occurring between 1995-96 and 1999-2000. When poverty is measured in 'absolute' terms using a poverty line that is held constant in real terms, the poverty rate declined overall, but was more or less constant between 1996-97 and 2000-01. Estimates derived from wave III of Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) data indicate that those who were income poor in 2002-03 experienced twice as many hardship conditions as those who were not poor, with around one-quarter of the poor having problems paying bills or seeking external financial assistance. HILDA data also indicate that many of those who are in poverty in any single year manage to escape within the next 2 years, although it is too early to know whether they escape permanently, or slip back into poverty or oscillate on its margins. Copyright © 2006 The Economic Society of Australia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Tale of Cyclones, Exports and Surplus Forgone in Australia's Protected Banana Industry GST Reform in Australia: Implications of Estimating Price Elasticities of Demand for Food The State of Economics in 2012: Complacency Amid Crisis Buyer Groups, Antitrust and Outsiders Endogenous Changes in Property Rights Regime
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1