在带中继的自组网中分发源编码文件的两种方法的比较

Siddhartha S. Borkotoky, M. Pursley
{"title":"在带中继的自组网中分发源编码文件的两种方法的比较","authors":"Siddhartha S. Borkotoky, M. Pursley","doi":"10.1109/ITA.2017.8023464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate two approaches to fountain-coded broadcast file distribution in an ad hoc packet radio network. In the first method, all destinations receive fountain-coded packets directly from the source. In the second method, after one destination obtains the file, it acts as a relay node by applying continued fountain coding to the file and sending the encoded packets to other destinations. The other destinations combine the fountain-coded packets they received from the source with those they obtain from the relay node. We compare the performance of the two methods when they are employed in a network whose links have Rayleigh fading. As performance benchmarks, we also examine two conventional broadcast techniques that use automatic repeat request (ARQ) for retransmission of erased packets.","PeriodicalId":305510,"journal":{"name":"2017 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA)","volume":"163 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of two methods for fountain-coded file distribution in an ad hoc network with relays\",\"authors\":\"Siddhartha S. Borkotoky, M. Pursley\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITA.2017.8023464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate two approaches to fountain-coded broadcast file distribution in an ad hoc packet radio network. In the first method, all destinations receive fountain-coded packets directly from the source. In the second method, after one destination obtains the file, it acts as a relay node by applying continued fountain coding to the file and sending the encoded packets to other destinations. The other destinations combine the fountain-coded packets they received from the source with those they obtain from the relay node. We compare the performance of the two methods when they are employed in a network whose links have Rayleigh fading. As performance benchmarks, we also examine two conventional broadcast techniques that use automatic repeat request (ARQ) for retransmission of erased packets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA)\",\"volume\":\"163 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITA.2017.8023464\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITA.2017.8023464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们研究了在自组织分组无线网络中源编码广播文件分发的两种方法。在第一种方法中,所有目的地都直接从源接收源编码的数据包。在第二种方法中,在一个目的地获得文件后,它充当中继节点,对文件应用持续的喷泉编码,并将编码后的数据包发送到其他目的地。其他目的地将它们从源接收到的源编码数据包与从中继节点获得的数据包结合起来。我们比较了两种方法在链路存在瑞利衰落的网络中的性能。作为性能基准,我们还研究了两种传统的广播技术,它们使用自动重复请求(ARQ)来重传被擦除的数据包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of two methods for fountain-coded file distribution in an ad hoc network with relays
We investigate two approaches to fountain-coded broadcast file distribution in an ad hoc packet radio network. In the first method, all destinations receive fountain-coded packets directly from the source. In the second method, after one destination obtains the file, it acts as a relay node by applying continued fountain coding to the file and sending the encoded packets to other destinations. The other destinations combine the fountain-coded packets they received from the source with those they obtain from the relay node. We compare the performance of the two methods when they are employed in a network whose links have Rayleigh fading. As performance benchmarks, we also examine two conventional broadcast techniques that use automatic repeat request (ARQ) for retransmission of erased packets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A novel index coding scheme and its application to coded caching Multidimensional index modulation in wireless communications Claude Shannon in Chess Review Device-aware routing and scheduling in multi-hop Device-to-Device networks Power-performance analysis of a simple one-bit transceiver
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1