{"title":"当事人没有请求的，宣告法院判决无效，并将案件移送再审","authors":"Cristina Ramona Duță","doi":"10.47577/10.1234/arsaequi.12.1.199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It follows from the constant judicial practice of civil Courts that in Article 480 parag (3) second sentence of de Civile Procedure Code provides for an extrinsic condition for the valdity of the decision by which the Court of appeal refers the case for retrial, namely the existence of an expres request to that effect by at least one of the parties.","PeriodicalId":410800,"journal":{"name":"Ars Aequi","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nullity of the court decision and referral of the case for retrial when the parties do not request such a measure\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Ramona Duță\",\"doi\":\"10.47577/10.1234/arsaequi.12.1.199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It follows from the constant judicial practice of civil Courts that in Article 480 parag (3) second sentence of de Civile Procedure Code provides for an extrinsic condition for the valdity of the decision by which the Court of appeal refers the case for retrial, namely the existence of an expres request to that effect by at least one of the parties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ars Aequi\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ars Aequi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47577/10.1234/arsaequi.12.1.199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ars Aequi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47577/10.1234/arsaequi.12.1.199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nullity of the court decision and referral of the case for retrial when the parties do not request such a measure
It follows from the constant judicial practice of civil Courts that in Article 480 parag (3) second sentence of de Civile Procedure Code provides for an extrinsic condition for the valdity of the decision by which the Court of appeal refers the case for retrial, namely the existence of an expres request to that effect by at least one of the parties.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
