重新思考冒险规划中的群体发展:一个定性的检验

Levi A. Dexel, Bruce Martin, L. Black, Aiko Yoshino
{"title":"重新思考冒险规划中的群体发展:一个定性的检验","authors":"Levi A. Dexel, Bruce Martin, L. Black, Aiko Yoshino","doi":"10.1353/ROE.2010.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The purpose of the study was to re-examine the efficacy of Tuckman’s (1965) model of group development in adventure programming. More specifically, the researchers were interested in comparing Tuckman’s traditional sequential model to more contemporary non-sequential and integrative models that have emerged as alternative ways to conceptualize the process of group development. The researchers used a case study approach (Merriam, 2001) and techniques characteristic of naturalistic inquiry (Lincoln & Guba, 1985) to explore the nature of group development among participants in a weeklong sea kayaking expedition. The researchers concluded that more contemporary models of group development more accurately explained the process of group development in this case study than Tuckman’s (1965) traditional model of group development.","PeriodicalId":269462,"journal":{"name":"Research in Outdoor Education","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-Thinking Group Development in Adventure Programming: A Qualitative Examination\",\"authors\":\"Levi A. Dexel, Bruce Martin, L. Black, Aiko Yoshino\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ROE.2010.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: The purpose of the study was to re-examine the efficacy of Tuckman’s (1965) model of group development in adventure programming. More specifically, the researchers were interested in comparing Tuckman’s traditional sequential model to more contemporary non-sequential and integrative models that have emerged as alternative ways to conceptualize the process of group development. The researchers used a case study approach (Merriam, 2001) and techniques characteristic of naturalistic inquiry (Lincoln & Guba, 1985) to explore the nature of group development among participants in a weeklong sea kayaking expedition. The researchers concluded that more contemporary models of group development more accurately explained the process of group development in this case study than Tuckman’s (1965) traditional model of group development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Outdoor Education\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Outdoor Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ROE.2010.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Outdoor Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ROE.2010.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本研究的目的是重新检验塔克曼(1965)的冒险节目群体发展模型的有效性。更具体地说,研究人员感兴趣的是比较塔克曼的传统顺序模型和更现代的非顺序和综合模型,这些模型已经成为概念化群体发展过程的替代方法。研究人员使用案例研究法(Merriam, 2001)和自然主义探究的技术特征(Lincoln & Guba, 1985)来探索为期一周的海上皮划艇探险参与者群体发展的本质。研究人员得出结论,在本案例研究中,与Tuckman(1965)的传统群体发展模型相比,更现代的群体发展模型更准确地解释了群体发展过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Re-Thinking Group Development in Adventure Programming: A Qualitative Examination
Abstract: The purpose of the study was to re-examine the efficacy of Tuckman’s (1965) model of group development in adventure programming. More specifically, the researchers were interested in comparing Tuckman’s traditional sequential model to more contemporary non-sequential and integrative models that have emerged as alternative ways to conceptualize the process of group development. The researchers used a case study approach (Merriam, 2001) and techniques characteristic of naturalistic inquiry (Lincoln & Guba, 1985) to explore the nature of group development among participants in a weeklong sea kayaking expedition. The researchers concluded that more contemporary models of group development more accurately explained the process of group development in this case study than Tuckman’s (1965) traditional model of group development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Relationship Between Leadership Style and Group Cohesion in Outdoor Education The Unnecessary Prescription of Transcription: The Promise of Audio-coding in Interview Research Adolescent Sense of Belonging in Outdoor Adventure Education: The Influence of Conflict and Instructors Dynamic Horizons: A Research and Conceptual Summary of Outdoor Education by Chloe Humphreys (review) Exploring Motivations and Constraints of Minority Participation: College Outdoor Adventure Programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1