使用神经网络来帮助CVSS风险聚合-一种经验验证的方法

Alexander Beck , Stefan Rass
{"title":"使用神经网络来帮助CVSS风险聚合-一种经验验证的方法","authors":"Alexander Beck ,&nbsp;Stefan Rass","doi":"10.1016/j.jides.2016.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Managing risks in large information infrastructures is often tied to inevitable simplification of the system, to make a risk analysis feasible. One common way of “compacting” matters for efficient decision making is to aggregate vulnerabilities and risks identified for distinct components into an overall risk measure related to an entire subsystem and the system as a whole. Traditionally, this aggregation is done pessimistically by taking the overall risk as the maximum of all individual risks, following the heuristic understanding that the “security chain” is only as strong as its weakest link. As that method is quite wasteful of information, this work proposes a new approach, which uses neural networks to resemble human expert’s decision making in the same regard. To validate the concept, we conducted an empirical study on human expert’s risk assessments, and trained several candidate networks on the empirical data to identify the best approximation to the opinions in our expert group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation in Digital Ecosystems","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 148-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jides.2016.10.002","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using neural networks to aid CVSS risk aggregation — An empirically validated approach\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Beck ,&nbsp;Stefan Rass\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jides.2016.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Managing risks in large information infrastructures is often tied to inevitable simplification of the system, to make a risk analysis feasible. One common way of “compacting” matters for efficient decision making is to aggregate vulnerabilities and risks identified for distinct components into an overall risk measure related to an entire subsystem and the system as a whole. Traditionally, this aggregation is done pessimistically by taking the overall risk as the maximum of all individual risks, following the heuristic understanding that the “security chain” is only as strong as its weakest link. As that method is quite wasteful of information, this work proposes a new approach, which uses neural networks to resemble human expert’s decision making in the same regard. To validate the concept, we conducted an empirical study on human expert’s risk assessments, and trained several candidate networks on the empirical data to identify the best approximation to the opinions in our expert group.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovation in Digital Ecosystems\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 148-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jides.2016.10.002\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovation in Digital Ecosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352664516300153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation in Digital Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352664516300153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

管理大型信息基础设施中的风险通常与不可避免的系统简化联系在一起,以使风险分析可行。有效决策制定的“压缩”事项的一种常见方法是将为不同组件识别的漏洞和风险聚合到与整个子系统和系统作为一个整体相关的总体风险度量中。传统上,这种聚合是悲观地通过将整体风险作为所有个体风险的最大值来完成的,遵循启发式理解,即“安全链”的强度仅与其最弱的环节一样强。由于这种方法非常浪费信息,本文提出了一种新的方法,即利用神经网络来模拟人类专家在同一方面的决策。为了验证这一概念,我们对人类专家的风险评估进行了实证研究,并在经验数据上训练了几个候选网络,以确定与我们专家组意见的最佳近似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using neural networks to aid CVSS risk aggregation — An empirically validated approach

Managing risks in large information infrastructures is often tied to inevitable simplification of the system, to make a risk analysis feasible. One common way of “compacting” matters for efficient decision making is to aggregate vulnerabilities and risks identified for distinct components into an overall risk measure related to an entire subsystem and the system as a whole. Traditionally, this aggregation is done pessimistically by taking the overall risk as the maximum of all individual risks, following the heuristic understanding that the “security chain” is only as strong as its weakest link. As that method is quite wasteful of information, this work proposes a new approach, which uses neural networks to resemble human expert’s decision making in the same regard. To validate the concept, we conducted an empirical study on human expert’s risk assessments, and trained several candidate networks on the empirical data to identify the best approximation to the opinions in our expert group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface Meaning-based machine learning for information assurance Wavelet decomposition of software entropy reveals symptoms of malicious code Evaluating the descriptive power of Instagram hashtags Occupancy driven building performance assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1