{"title":"在体外真空中","authors":"P. Wilson","doi":"10.1080/10295925.1998.9631201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Micropropagation in vitro and stem cuttings propagation are comparable since, in both, shoots develop normally from pre-existing buds while roots have to arise adventitiously. The percentage of propagation papers in Forestry Abstracts on micropropagation has steadily increased over the last 15 years to at least 80% of the total, even though virtually all commercial propagation in forestry is by stem cuttings. The often-cited advantages of micropropagation (including rapid multiplication) are shown to be insubstantial, at least for many applications, indicating that research priorities are out of balance.","PeriodicalId":228456,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African Forestry Journal","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro in vacuo\",\"authors\":\"P. Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10295925.1998.9631201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Micropropagation in vitro and stem cuttings propagation are comparable since, in both, shoots develop normally from pre-existing buds while roots have to arise adventitiously. The percentage of propagation papers in Forestry Abstracts on micropropagation has steadily increased over the last 15 years to at least 80% of the total, even though virtually all commercial propagation in forestry is by stem cuttings. The often-cited advantages of micropropagation (including rapid multiplication) are shown to be insubstantial, at least for many applications, indicating that research priorities are out of balance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Southern African Forestry Journal\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Southern African Forestry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10295925.1998.9631201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African Forestry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10295925.1998.9631201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Micropropagation in vitro and stem cuttings propagation are comparable since, in both, shoots develop normally from pre-existing buds while roots have to arise adventitiously. The percentage of propagation papers in Forestry Abstracts on micropropagation has steadily increased over the last 15 years to at least 80% of the total, even though virtually all commercial propagation in forestry is by stem cuttings. The often-cited advantages of micropropagation (including rapid multiplication) are shown to be insubstantial, at least for many applications, indicating that research priorities are out of balance.