{"title":"股骨头坏死坏死灶的测定","authors":"J. Kang, K. Moon, R. Kim, S. Na","doi":"10.5371/JKHS.2011.23.4.297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The size of the necrotic lesion is known to be the most important prognostic factor in osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). We evaluated the accuracy and relationship of three different measuring methods of necrotic lesions for ONFH. Materials and Methods: Sixty hips that had ONFH were measured on an MRI by two orthopaedic surgeons using Steinberg, Kim, and modified Kerboul methods. Based on the lesion size of the necrosis as measured with the computerized Steinberg method, the hips were divided into Group I (small lesion: less than 15%), Group II (medium lesion: 15~30%), and Group III (large lesion: more than 30%). Data of the Kim and modified Kerboul methods were reclassified by statistical analysis according to the groups classified by the Steinberg method. Results: Average lesion size of Group I (16 hips) was 10.92%, the average size of Group II (33 hips) was 21.68%, and the average size of Group III (11 hips) was 36.80%. We established a new criteria of the Kim and modified Kerboul methods based on Steinberg. The Kim method was reclassified into Groups I (less than 18%), II (18~33%), and III (33% or more). And the modified Kerboul method was divided into Groups I (less than 200.6。 ), II (200.6~262.4。 ), and III (more than 262.4。 ) as well. Conclusion: New criteria for the Kim and modified Kerboul method would be a useful indicator for the prognosis and treatment plan in ONFH.","PeriodicalId":410202,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of Necrotic Lesion in Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head\",\"authors\":\"J. Kang, K. Moon, R. Kim, S. Na\",\"doi\":\"10.5371/JKHS.2011.23.4.297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The size of the necrotic lesion is known to be the most important prognostic factor in osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). We evaluated the accuracy and relationship of three different measuring methods of necrotic lesions for ONFH. Materials and Methods: Sixty hips that had ONFH were measured on an MRI by two orthopaedic surgeons using Steinberg, Kim, and modified Kerboul methods. Based on the lesion size of the necrosis as measured with the computerized Steinberg method, the hips were divided into Group I (small lesion: less than 15%), Group II (medium lesion: 15~30%), and Group III (large lesion: more than 30%). Data of the Kim and modified Kerboul methods were reclassified by statistical analysis according to the groups classified by the Steinberg method. Results: Average lesion size of Group I (16 hips) was 10.92%, the average size of Group II (33 hips) was 21.68%, and the average size of Group III (11 hips) was 36.80%. We established a new criteria of the Kim and modified Kerboul methods based on Steinberg. The Kim method was reclassified into Groups I (less than 18%), II (18~33%), and III (33% or more). And the modified Kerboul method was divided into Groups I (less than 200.6。 ), II (200.6~262.4。 ), and III (more than 262.4。 ) as well. Conclusion: New criteria for the Kim and modified Kerboul method would be a useful indicator for the prognosis and treatment plan in ONFH.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5371/JKHS.2011.23.4.297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5371/JKHS.2011.23.4.297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:已知坏死灶的大小是影响股骨头骨坏死(ONFH)预后的最重要因素。我们评估了三种不同的ONFH坏死病变测量方法的准确性和相关性。材料和方法:由两名骨科医生使用Steinberg, Kim和改进的Kerboul方法在MRI上测量60个有ONFH的髋关节。根据电脑化Steinberg法测定的坏死灶大小,将髋关节分为小病变小于15%组、中病变15~30%组、大病变大于30%组。根据Steinberg方法分类的分组,对Kim方法和改进的kerboull方法的数据进行统计分析。结果:ⅰ组(16髋)平均病变大小为10.92%,ⅱ组(33髋)平均病变大小为21.68%,ⅲ组(11髋)平均病变大小为36.80%。我们建立了新的Kim标准,并在Steinberg的基础上改进了Kerboul方法。Kim法重新分为I组(小于18%)、II组(18~33%)和III组(33%以上)。将改进的Kerboul方法分为I组(小于200.6)。, ii (200.6~262.4 .)和III(超过262.4。)也结论:新的Kim标准和改进的Kerboul方法可作为ONFH预后和治疗方案的有效指标。
Measurement of Necrotic Lesion in Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head
Purpose: The size of the necrotic lesion is known to be the most important prognostic factor in osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). We evaluated the accuracy and relationship of three different measuring methods of necrotic lesions for ONFH. Materials and Methods: Sixty hips that had ONFH were measured on an MRI by two orthopaedic surgeons using Steinberg, Kim, and modified Kerboul methods. Based on the lesion size of the necrosis as measured with the computerized Steinberg method, the hips were divided into Group I (small lesion: less than 15%), Group II (medium lesion: 15~30%), and Group III (large lesion: more than 30%). Data of the Kim and modified Kerboul methods were reclassified by statistical analysis according to the groups classified by the Steinberg method. Results: Average lesion size of Group I (16 hips) was 10.92%, the average size of Group II (33 hips) was 21.68%, and the average size of Group III (11 hips) was 36.80%. We established a new criteria of the Kim and modified Kerboul methods based on Steinberg. The Kim method was reclassified into Groups I (less than 18%), II (18~33%), and III (33% or more). And the modified Kerboul method was divided into Groups I (less than 200.6。 ), II (200.6~262.4。 ), and III (more than 262.4。 ) as well. Conclusion: New criteria for the Kim and modified Kerboul method would be a useful indicator for the prognosis and treatment plan in ONFH.