基于测量的特文宁等价物鉴别方法的比较研究

Haoyu Yuan, F. Li
{"title":"基于测量的特文宁等价物鉴别方法的比较研究","authors":"Haoyu Yuan, F. Li","doi":"10.1109/NAPS.2014.6965369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the development of phasor measurement units (PMU), real-time voltage stability monitoring techniques using phasor measurements have been widely discussed in the past decade. For various measurement-based techniques, the fundamental idea behind them is to identify the Thevenin equivalents (TE) of the outer system seen from the nodes/areas of interests, and then assess the voltage stability margin based on the equivalent circuits. Therefore, fast and accurate identification of the TE is crucial for such online monitoring applications. Though several identification methods have been proposed claiming to achieve good performance, they have not been explicitly compared with each other. This work presents an analogous comparative study of four different methods. After a brief introduction, the four methods are compared in the aspects of time complexity and measurement needed by using an algorithm analysis. Then they are tested on the measurements generated from time domain simulations of the Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC) 140-bus system. Following the case study, a detailed performance analysis is given, and the results can serve as a general guidance on choosing the TE identification methods and the corresponding parameters.","PeriodicalId":421766,"journal":{"name":"2014 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of measurement-based Thevenin equivalents identification methods\",\"authors\":\"Haoyu Yuan, F. Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NAPS.2014.6965369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the development of phasor measurement units (PMU), real-time voltage stability monitoring techniques using phasor measurements have been widely discussed in the past decade. For various measurement-based techniques, the fundamental idea behind them is to identify the Thevenin equivalents (TE) of the outer system seen from the nodes/areas of interests, and then assess the voltage stability margin based on the equivalent circuits. Therefore, fast and accurate identification of the TE is crucial for such online monitoring applications. Though several identification methods have been proposed claiming to achieve good performance, they have not been explicitly compared with each other. This work presents an analogous comparative study of four different methods. After a brief introduction, the four methods are compared in the aspects of time complexity and measurement needed by using an algorithm analysis. Then they are tested on the measurements generated from time domain simulations of the Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC) 140-bus system. Following the case study, a detailed performance analysis is given, and the results can serve as a general guidance on choosing the TE identification methods and the corresponding parameters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":421766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS.2014.6965369\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS.2014.6965369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

随着相量测量装置(PMU)的发展,基于相量测量的实时电压稳定监测技术在过去的十年中得到了广泛的讨论。对于各种基于测量的技术,其背后的基本思想是从感兴趣的节点/区域中识别外部系统的Thevenin等效(TE),然后基于等效电路评估电压稳定裕度。因此,快速准确地识别TE对于此类在线监测应用至关重要。虽然已经提出了几种声称达到良好性能的识别方法,但它们并没有明确地相互比较。这项工作提出了四种不同方法的类似比较研究。在简要介绍后,通过算法分析,对四种方法在时间复杂度和所需测量量方面进行了比较。然后在东北电力协调委员会(NPCC) 140总线系统的时域仿真结果上进行了测试。在案例分析的基础上,给出了详细的性能分析,其结果可以作为选择TE识别方法和相应参数的一般指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative study of measurement-based Thevenin equivalents identification methods
With the development of phasor measurement units (PMU), real-time voltage stability monitoring techniques using phasor measurements have been widely discussed in the past decade. For various measurement-based techniques, the fundamental idea behind them is to identify the Thevenin equivalents (TE) of the outer system seen from the nodes/areas of interests, and then assess the voltage stability margin based on the equivalent circuits. Therefore, fast and accurate identification of the TE is crucial for such online monitoring applications. Though several identification methods have been proposed claiming to achieve good performance, they have not been explicitly compared with each other. This work presents an analogous comparative study of four different methods. After a brief introduction, the four methods are compared in the aspects of time complexity and measurement needed by using an algorithm analysis. Then they are tested on the measurements generated from time domain simulations of the Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC) 140-bus system. Following the case study, a detailed performance analysis is given, and the results can serve as a general guidance on choosing the TE identification methods and the corresponding parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Addressing cyber security for the oil, gas and energy sector Investigation of voltage stability in three-phase unbalanced distribution systems with DG using modal analysis technique Dynamic Remedial Action Scheme using online transient stability analysis Implementing a real-time cyber-physical system test bed in RTDS and OPNET Size reduction of permanent magnet generators for wind turbines with higher energy density permanent magnets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1