国家层面上

Planners in Politics Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.4337/9781839100116.00007

J. Ubillos

{"title":"国家层面上","authors":"J. Ubillos","doi":"10.4337/9781839100116.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essential objective of this article is to link the exposure of firms to increasing international competition and the evolution of social welfare systems, while states lose the use of some policies aimed to improve national competitiveness. The empirical study focuses on EU countries, and investigates whether trends in welfare provision levels and funding are coherent with theoretical hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":292612,"journal":{"name":"Planners in Politics","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National level\",\"authors\":\"J. Ubillos\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781839100116.00007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The essential objective of this article is to link the exposure of firms to increasing international competition and the evolution of social welfare systems, while states lose the use of some policies aimed to improve national competitiveness. The empirical study focuses on EU countries, and investigates whether trends in welfare provision levels and funding are coherent with theoretical hypothesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Planners in Politics\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Planners in Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839100116.00007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planners in Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839100116.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的基本目标是将企业的风险敞口与日益激烈的国际竞争和社会福利制度的演变联系起来，而国家则失去了一些旨在提高国家竞争力的政策的使用。实证研究的重点是欧盟国家，并调查了福利提供水平和资金的趋势是否与理论假设一致。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

National level

The essential objective of this article is to link the exposure of firms to increasing international competition and the evolution of social welfare systems, while states lose the use of some policies aimed to improve national competitiveness. The empirical study focuses on EU countries, and investigates whether trends in welfare provision levels and funding are coherent with theoretical hypothesis.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助