比色法两点停止酶活性测定显示零级反应的情况。

Progress in clinical pathology Pub Date : 1975-01-01
R G Martinek
{"title":"比色法两点停止酶活性测定显示零级反应的情况。","authors":"R G Martinek","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A careful assessment is made of the relative merits of the two common approaches to enzyme determinations: the so-called kinetic and the two-point colorimetric. A plea is made for a pluralistic approach to the selection of enzyme methods based on a full understanding of the modalities of each procedure. A rational approach to clinical enzymology demands an intellignet choice of methods, irrespective of mode, that will best suit a particular laboratory situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":76368,"journal":{"name":"Progress in clinical pathology","volume":"6 ","pages":"67-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The case for colorimetric two-point stopped-enzyme-activity determinations exhibiting zero-order reactions.\",\"authors\":\"R G Martinek\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A careful assessment is made of the relative merits of the two common approaches to enzyme determinations: the so-called kinetic and the two-point colorimetric. A plea is made for a pluralistic approach to the selection of enzyme methods based on a full understanding of the modalities of each procedure. A rational approach to clinical enzymology demands an intellignet choice of methods, irrespective of mode, that will best suit a particular laboratory situation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in clinical pathology\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"67-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1975-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in clinical pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

仔细评估了两种常用的酶测定方法的相对优点:所谓的动力学比色法和两点比色法。请求在充分理解每个程序的方式的基础上,对酶方法的选择采取多元化的方法。一个合理的临床酶学方法需要明智地选择最适合特定实验室情况的方法,而不考虑模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The case for colorimetric two-point stopped-enzyme-activity determinations exhibiting zero-order reactions.

A careful assessment is made of the relative merits of the two common approaches to enzyme determinations: the so-called kinetic and the two-point colorimetric. A plea is made for a pluralistic approach to the selection of enzyme methods based on a full understanding of the modalities of each procedure. A rational approach to clinical enzymology demands an intellignet choice of methods, irrespective of mode, that will best suit a particular laboratory situation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ferritin. Progress in the monitoring of human interferon in body fluids and the phenotypic expression of human interferon activity. Progress in the measurement of circulating fibrinogen derivatives. Peripheral blood and bone marrow involvement by non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: morphological, immunological and cytochemical features. B cell neoplasms: correlation of recent developments with the biology of normal B lymphocytes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1