{"title":"调节对青春期男孩心肺功能的影响。","authors":"G B Shasby, F C Hagerman","doi":"10.1177/036354657500300301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulse rate and oxygen consumption were measured for 19 boys (agen 12-13) assigned to either Distance, Interval, or No-Training regimens, during a 5 min. run at 6 m.p.h., zero % grade on a motor driven treadmill prior to a 12 week conditioning period, following conditioning, and after four months of deconditioning. Oxygen consumption was assessed by opencircuitry and heart rate monitored by direct electrocardiography. Both conditioning groups significantly improved cardiovascular fitness (Distance group: 175-152 beats/min. and Interval group: 175-159 beats/min.) at P less than .01, but no differences were noted between them. They differed significantly from the Control group (P less than .05) which showed no change (172-173 beats/min.). No significant differences occurred between any of the groups for Vo2 variables, but Within group analysis statistically favored the Distance group. Post-conditioning and -deconditioning comparisoms indicated taht deconditioning had a deleterious effect on cardiorespiratory function. Cardiorespiratory fitness improved to the extent that competitive running events of 2-6 miles are suggested for this age group, but as the data indicated, only after sufficient training. Task similarity of training and standard test and running volume apparently afforded a slightly greater improvement of cardiorespiratory fitness in the Distance group. Marked deterioration of fitness during deconditioning was attributed to complete absence of a training stimulus.</p>","PeriodicalId":76661,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of sports medicine","volume":"3 3","pages":"97-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/036354657500300301","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of conditioning on cardiorespiratory function in adolescent boys.\",\"authors\":\"G B Shasby, F C Hagerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/036354657500300301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pulse rate and oxygen consumption were measured for 19 boys (agen 12-13) assigned to either Distance, Interval, or No-Training regimens, during a 5 min. run at 6 m.p.h., zero % grade on a motor driven treadmill prior to a 12 week conditioning period, following conditioning, and after four months of deconditioning. Oxygen consumption was assessed by opencircuitry and heart rate monitored by direct electrocardiography. Both conditioning groups significantly improved cardiovascular fitness (Distance group: 175-152 beats/min. and Interval group: 175-159 beats/min.) at P less than .01, but no differences were noted between them. They differed significantly from the Control group (P less than .05) which showed no change (172-173 beats/min.). No significant differences occurred between any of the groups for Vo2 variables, but Within group analysis statistically favored the Distance group. Post-conditioning and -deconditioning comparisoms indicated taht deconditioning had a deleterious effect on cardiorespiratory function. Cardiorespiratory fitness improved to the extent that competitive running events of 2-6 miles are suggested for this age group, but as the data indicated, only after sufficient training. Task similarity of training and standard test and running volume apparently afforded a slightly greater improvement of cardiorespiratory fitness in the Distance group. Marked deterioration of fitness during deconditioning was attributed to complete absence of a training stimulus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of sports medicine\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"97-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1975-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/036354657500300301\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of sports medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/036354657500300301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/036354657500300301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
摘要
研究人员对19名男孩(12-13岁)的脉搏率和耗氧量进行了测量,他们被分配到距离、间歇或无训练方案中,在12周的适应期之前,在适应期之后,在4个月的适应期之后,在电动跑步机上以6英里每小时0分的速度跑步5分钟。氧耗量通过体外循环评估,心率通过直接心电图监测。两个调节组都显著改善了心血管健康(距离组:175-152次/分钟)。间歇组:175 ~ 159次/min), P < 0.01,但两组间无差异。与对照组(172 ~ 173次/分)比较,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。Vo2变量在任何组之间都没有显著差异,但在组内分析统计上有利于Distance组。调节后与调节后的比较表明调节对心肺功能有不良影响。心肺功能得到改善,该年龄组建议参加2-6英里的竞技跑步活动,但正如数据所示,只有在充分的训练之后。训练与标准测试的任务相似性和跑步量明显地在距离组中提供了稍大的心肺健康改善。适应度的显著下降是由于完全缺乏训练刺激。
The effects of conditioning on cardiorespiratory function in adolescent boys.
Pulse rate and oxygen consumption were measured for 19 boys (agen 12-13) assigned to either Distance, Interval, or No-Training regimens, during a 5 min. run at 6 m.p.h., zero % grade on a motor driven treadmill prior to a 12 week conditioning period, following conditioning, and after four months of deconditioning. Oxygen consumption was assessed by opencircuitry and heart rate monitored by direct electrocardiography. Both conditioning groups significantly improved cardiovascular fitness (Distance group: 175-152 beats/min. and Interval group: 175-159 beats/min.) at P less than .01, but no differences were noted between them. They differed significantly from the Control group (P less than .05) which showed no change (172-173 beats/min.). No significant differences occurred between any of the groups for Vo2 variables, but Within group analysis statistically favored the Distance group. Post-conditioning and -deconditioning comparisoms indicated taht deconditioning had a deleterious effect on cardiorespiratory function. Cardiorespiratory fitness improved to the extent that competitive running events of 2-6 miles are suggested for this age group, but as the data indicated, only after sufficient training. Task similarity of training and standard test and running volume apparently afforded a slightly greater improvement of cardiorespiratory fitness in the Distance group. Marked deterioration of fitness during deconditioning was attributed to complete absence of a training stimulus.