在数字图书馆中建立复杂的研究馆藏:本体论意义的调查

Terhi Nurmikko-Fuller, Kevin R. Page, P. Willcox, Jacob Jett, Christopher R. Maden, Timothy W. Cole, Colleen Fallaw, Megan Senseney, J. S. Downie
{"title":"在数字图书馆中建立复杂的研究馆藏:本体论意义的调查","authors":"Terhi Nurmikko-Fuller, Kevin R. Page, P. Willcox, Jacob Jett, Christopher R. Maden, Timothy W. Cole, Colleen Fallaw, Megan Senseney, J. S. Downie","doi":"10.1145/2756406.2756944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bibliographic metadata standards are a longstanding mechanism for Digital Libraries to manage records and express relationships between them. As digital scholarship, particularly in the humanities, incorporates and manipulates these records in an increasingly direct manner, existing systems are proving insufficient for providing the underlying addressability and relational expressivity required to construct and interact with complex research collections. In this paper we describe motivations for these \"worksets\" and the technical requirements they raise. We survey the coverage of existing bibliographic ontologies in the context of meeting these scholarly needs, and finally provide an illustrated discussion of potential extensions that might fully realize a solution.","PeriodicalId":256118,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building Complex Research Collections in Digital Libraries: A Survey of Ontology Implications\",\"authors\":\"Terhi Nurmikko-Fuller, Kevin R. Page, P. Willcox, Jacob Jett, Christopher R. Maden, Timothy W. Cole, Colleen Fallaw, Megan Senseney, J. S. Downie\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2756406.2756944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bibliographic metadata standards are a longstanding mechanism for Digital Libraries to manage records and express relationships between them. As digital scholarship, particularly in the humanities, incorporates and manipulates these records in an increasingly direct manner, existing systems are proving insufficient for providing the underlying addressability and relational expressivity required to construct and interact with complex research collections. In this paper we describe motivations for these \\\"worksets\\\" and the technical requirements they raise. We survey the coverage of existing bibliographic ontologies in the context of meeting these scholarly needs, and finally provide an illustrated discussion of potential extensions that might fully realize a solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2756406.2756944\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2756406.2756944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

书目元数据标准是数字图书馆管理记录和表达记录之间关系的长期机制。随着数字学术,特别是人文学科,以越来越直接的方式整合和操纵这些记录,现有的系统被证明不足以提供构建复杂研究收藏所需的潜在可寻址性和关系表达性。在本文中,我们描述了这些“工作集”的动机以及它们提出的技术需求。我们在满足这些学术需求的背景下调查了现有书目本体的覆盖范围,并最后提供了一个可能完全实现解决方案的潜在扩展的说明讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Building Complex Research Collections in Digital Libraries: A Survey of Ontology Implications
Bibliographic metadata standards are a longstanding mechanism for Digital Libraries to manage records and express relationships between them. As digital scholarship, particularly in the humanities, incorporates and manipulates these records in an increasingly direct manner, existing systems are proving insufficient for providing the underlying addressability and relational expressivity required to construct and interact with complex research collections. In this paper we describe motivations for these "worksets" and the technical requirements they raise. We survey the coverage of existing bibliographic ontologies in the context of meeting these scholarly needs, and finally provide an illustrated discussion of potential extensions that might fully realize a solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combining Classifiers and User Feedback for Disambiguating Author Names Improving Access to Large-scale Digital Libraries ThroughSemantic-enhanced Search and Disambiguation ConfAssist: A Conflict Resolution Framework for Assisting the Categorization of Computer Science Conferences The HathiTrust Research Center: Providing analytic access to the HathiTrust Digital Library's 4.7 billion pages Scholarly Document Information Extraction using Extensible Features for Efficient Higher Order Semi-CRFs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1