移动医疗应用:用户自适应的可视化和上下文会影响对安全和隐私的感知吗?

Joana Muchagata, P. Vieira-Marques, A. Ferreira
{"title":"移动医疗应用:用户自适应的可视化和上下文会影响对安全和隐私的感知吗?","authors":"Joana Muchagata, P. Vieira-Marques, A. Ferreira","doi":"10.5220/0007724304440451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through mobile applications, patients and health professionals are able to access and monitor health data. But even with user-adaptive systems, which can adjust interface content according to individual’s needs and context (e.g., physical location), data privacy can be at risk, as these techniques do not aim to protect them or even identify the presence of vulnerabilities. The main goal of this paper is to test with end-users the adaptive visualization techniques, together with the context where they are used, to understand how these may influence users’ security perception, and decide which techniques can be applied to improve security and privacy of visualized data. An online survey was applied to test two different use-cases and contexts, where traditional access and access using visualization techniques are compared in terms of security characteristics. Preliminary results with 27 participants show that when accessing personal data from a patients’ perspective, the context has higher influence in the perception of confidentiality (authorized access) and integrity (authorized modification) of visualized data while for a health professional’s perspective, independently of the context, the visualization techniques are the ones that seem to primarily influence participants’ choices for those security characteristics. For availability (data available to authorized users whenever necessary), both visualization techniques and context have little, or no influence, in the participants’ choice.","PeriodicalId":271024,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"mHealth Applications: Can User-adaptive Visualization and Context Affect the Perception of Security and Privacy?\",\"authors\":\"Joana Muchagata, P. Vieira-Marques, A. Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.5220/0007724304440451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Through mobile applications, patients and health professionals are able to access and monitor health data. But even with user-adaptive systems, which can adjust interface content according to individual’s needs and context (e.g., physical location), data privacy can be at risk, as these techniques do not aim to protect them or even identify the presence of vulnerabilities. The main goal of this paper is to test with end-users the adaptive visualization techniques, together with the context where they are used, to understand how these may influence users’ security perception, and decide which techniques can be applied to improve security and privacy of visualized data. An online survey was applied to test two different use-cases and contexts, where traditional access and access using visualization techniques are compared in terms of security characteristics. Preliminary results with 27 participants show that when accessing personal data from a patients’ perspective, the context has higher influence in the perception of confidentiality (authorized access) and integrity (authorized modification) of visualized data while for a health professional’s perspective, independently of the context, the visualization techniques are the ones that seem to primarily influence participants’ choices for those security characteristics. For availability (data available to authorized users whenever necessary), both visualization techniques and context have little, or no influence, in the participants’ choice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5220/0007724304440451\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0007724304440451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

通过移动应用程序,患者和卫生专业人员能够访问和监测健康数据。但是,即使使用用户自适应系统,它可以根据个人的需求和环境(例如,物理位置)调整界面内容,数据隐私也可能面临风险,因为这些技术的目的不是保护它们,甚至不是识别漏洞的存在。本文的主要目标是与最终用户一起测试自适应可视化技术,以及使用这些技术的上下文,以了解这些技术如何影响用户的安全感知,并决定可以应用哪些技术来提高可视化数据的安全性和隐私性。一项在线调查应用于测试两种不同的用例和上下文,其中比较了传统访问和使用可视化技术的访问的安全性特征。27名参与者的初步结果表明,从患者的角度访问个人数据时,情境对可视化数据的保密性(授权访问)和完整性(授权修改)的感知有更大的影响,而从卫生专业人员的角度来看,与情境无关,可视化技术似乎是主要影响参与者对这些安全特征选择的技术。对于可用性(授权用户在必要时可获得的数据),可视化技术和上下文对参与者的选择影响很小,或者没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
mHealth Applications: Can User-adaptive Visualization and Context Affect the Perception of Security and Privacy?
Through mobile applications, patients and health professionals are able to access and monitor health data. But even with user-adaptive systems, which can adjust interface content according to individual’s needs and context (e.g., physical location), data privacy can be at risk, as these techniques do not aim to protect them or even identify the presence of vulnerabilities. The main goal of this paper is to test with end-users the adaptive visualization techniques, together with the context where they are used, to understand how these may influence users’ security perception, and decide which techniques can be applied to improve security and privacy of visualized data. An online survey was applied to test two different use-cases and contexts, where traditional access and access using visualization techniques are compared in terms of security characteristics. Preliminary results with 27 participants show that when accessing personal data from a patients’ perspective, the context has higher influence in the perception of confidentiality (authorized access) and integrity (authorized modification) of visualized data while for a health professional’s perspective, independently of the context, the visualization techniques are the ones that seem to primarily influence participants’ choices for those security characteristics. For availability (data available to authorized users whenever necessary), both visualization techniques and context have little, or no influence, in the participants’ choice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CrudeBERT: Applying Economic Theory towards fine-tuning Transformer-based Sentiment Analysis Models to the Crude Oil Market A Next-Generation Digital Procurement Workspace Focusing on Information Integration, Automation, Analytics, and Sustainability An Applied Risk Identification Approach in the ICT Governance and Management Macroprocesses of a Brazilian Federal Government Agency Towards Unlocking the Potential of the Internet of Things for the Skilled Crafts An Open Platform for Smart Production: IT/OT Integration in a Smart Factory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1