国际税收筹划:加拿大诉阿尔塔能源诉卢森堡萨尔——基于《维也纳条约法公约》的分析

R. Danon
{"title":"国际税收筹划:加拿大诉阿尔塔能源诉卢森堡萨尔——基于《维也纳条约法公约》的分析","authors":"R. Danon","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2023.71.2.itp","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author analyzes the Supreme Court of Canada's judgment in Canada v. Alta Energy Luxembourg SARL in light of the rules of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT), including general principles of law such as good faith and legal certainty pursuant to the principle of systemic integration set out in article 31(3)(c) of the VCLT. The author concludes that the findings of the majority are correct as a matter of public international law.","PeriodicalId":375948,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Tax Planning: Canada v. Alta Energy Luxembourg SARL—An Analysis Based on the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties\",\"authors\":\"R. Danon\",\"doi\":\"10.32721/ctj.2023.71.2.itp\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author analyzes the Supreme Court of Canada's judgment in Canada v. Alta Energy Luxembourg SARL in light of the rules of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT), including general principles of law such as good faith and legal certainty pursuant to the principle of systemic integration set out in article 31(3)(c) of the VCLT. The author concludes that the findings of the majority are correct as a matter of public international law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2023.71.2.itp\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2023.71.2.itp","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据《维也纳条约法公约》(VCLT)第31条第3款(c)项规定的系统整合原则,包括诚信和法律确定性等一般法律原则,笔者分析了加拿大最高法院对加拿大诉Alta Energy Luxembourg SARL一案的判决。作者的结论是,就国际公法而言,多数人的结论是正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
International Tax Planning: Canada v. Alta Energy Luxembourg SARL—An Analysis Based on the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
The author analyzes the Supreme Court of Canada's judgment in Canada v. Alta Energy Luxembourg SARL in light of the rules of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT), including general principles of law such as good faith and legal certainty pursuant to the principle of systemic integration set out in article 31(3)(c) of the VCLT. The author concludes that the findings of the majority are correct as a matter of public international law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
False Statement or Omission Penalties in Canadian Tax Law Policy Forum: Some Reflections on Ethical Considerations in Tax Litigation Canadian Tax Foundation Awards/Prix de la Fondation canadienne de fiscalité Finances of the Nation: Survey of Provincial and Territorial Budgets, 2023-24 Policy Forum: Editors' Introduction—Ethics and Taxation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1