雇员被解雇/诉因被驳回:美国残疾人法案没有为易患遗传病的雇员提供避风港

F. Emmerich
{"title":"雇员被解雇/诉因被驳回:美国残疾人法案没有为易患遗传病的雇员提供避风港","authors":"F. Emmerich","doi":"10.2190/M4LV-U9L1-EB95-E9B1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because modern technology allows an employer to evaluate an employee's genetic code, the potential practice of discriminating against employees deter­ mined to be hypersusceptible to genetic illness has become a realistic employ­ ment practice. Although these genetically classified employees may be sub­ ject to future employment discrimination based on the employer classifying them as \"disabled,\" the employee will not be able to challenge such a dis­ criminatory practice under the Americans with Disabilities Act. A genetically hypersusceptible employee does not possess the requisite \"disability\" neces­ sary in order to have an actionable ADA claim against the employer. Because of the developing ability to isolate DNA molecules and to interpret their genetic codes, employers are now capable of evaluating an employee's potential long-term productivity. With a simple blood or urine test, employers can detect whether an employee is \"hypersusceptible to an occupational illness in a given job\" [1, p. 181; 2, p. 771]. Because of this ability to detect an individual's hypersusceptibility to disease based on genetic information, the issue arises of whether an employer can deny employment, terminate employment, or hinder advancement within employment for a hypersusceptible employee [1, p. 181]. Litigation premised on genetic hypersusceptibility is unreported because employers are just beginning to explore its possible use within the employment field. The enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) [3] may provide one avenue in which a plaintiff may challenge an employer's practice of","PeriodicalId":371129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employee Terminated/Cause of Action Dismissed: The Americans with Disabilities Act Provides no Haven for Employees Hypersusceptible to Genetic Illness\",\"authors\":\"F. Emmerich\",\"doi\":\"10.2190/M4LV-U9L1-EB95-E9B1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Because modern technology allows an employer to evaluate an employee's genetic code, the potential practice of discriminating against employees deter­ mined to be hypersusceptible to genetic illness has become a realistic employ­ ment practice. Although these genetically classified employees may be sub­ ject to future employment discrimination based on the employer classifying them as \\\"disabled,\\\" the employee will not be able to challenge such a dis­ criminatory practice under the Americans with Disabilities Act. A genetically hypersusceptible employee does not possess the requisite \\\"disability\\\" neces­ sary in order to have an actionable ADA claim against the employer. Because of the developing ability to isolate DNA molecules and to interpret their genetic codes, employers are now capable of evaluating an employee's potential long-term productivity. With a simple blood or urine test, employers can detect whether an employee is \\\"hypersusceptible to an occupational illness in a given job\\\" [1, p. 181; 2, p. 771]. Because of this ability to detect an individual's hypersusceptibility to disease based on genetic information, the issue arises of whether an employer can deny employment, terminate employment, or hinder advancement within employment for a hypersusceptible employee [1, p. 181]. Litigation premised on genetic hypersusceptibility is unreported because employers are just beginning to explore its possible use within the employment field. The enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) [3] may provide one avenue in which a plaintiff may challenge an employer's practice of\",\"PeriodicalId\":371129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Individual Employment Rights\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Individual Employment Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2190/M4LV-U9L1-EB95-E9B1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/M4LV-U9L1-EB95-E9B1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于现代技术允许雇主评估雇员的遗传密码,潜在的歧视雇员的做法被认为是遗传病的易感性已经成为现实的雇佣做法。尽管这些被基因分类的雇员可能会受到基于雇主将他们归类为“残疾人”的就业歧视,但根据《美国残疾人法》,雇员将无法挑战这种歧视性的犯罪行为。基因易感的雇员不具备必要的“残疾”条件——这是向雇主提出可执行的《美国残疾人法》索赔的必要条件。由于分离DNA分子和解释其遗传密码的能力不断发展,雇主现在能够评估员工潜在的长期生产力。通过简单的血液或尿液测试,雇主可以检测雇员是否“在特定工作中易患职业病”[1,第181页;[2],第771页。由于这种根据遗传信息检测个人对疾病的易感性的能力,出现了雇主是否可以拒绝雇用、终止雇用或阻碍易感性雇员在就业中的晋升的问题[1,第181页]。以基因易感性为前提的诉讼尚未报道,因为雇主刚刚开始探索其在就业领域的可能用途。《美国残疾人法》(ADA)[3]的颁布可能为原告对雇主的做法提出质疑提供了一条途径
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Employee Terminated/Cause of Action Dismissed: The Americans with Disabilities Act Provides no Haven for Employees Hypersusceptible to Genetic Illness
Because modern technology allows an employer to evaluate an employee's genetic code, the potential practice of discriminating against employees deter­ mined to be hypersusceptible to genetic illness has become a realistic employ­ ment practice. Although these genetically classified employees may be sub­ ject to future employment discrimination based on the employer classifying them as "disabled," the employee will not be able to challenge such a dis­ criminatory practice under the Americans with Disabilities Act. A genetically hypersusceptible employee does not possess the requisite "disability" neces­ sary in order to have an actionable ADA claim against the employer. Because of the developing ability to isolate DNA molecules and to interpret their genetic codes, employers are now capable of evaluating an employee's potential long-term productivity. With a simple blood or urine test, employers can detect whether an employee is "hypersusceptible to an occupational illness in a given job" [1, p. 181; 2, p. 771]. Because of this ability to detect an individual's hypersusceptibility to disease based on genetic information, the issue arises of whether an employer can deny employment, terminate employment, or hinder advancement within employment for a hypersusceptible employee [1, p. 181]. Litigation premised on genetic hypersusceptibility is unreported because employers are just beginning to explore its possible use within the employment field. The enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) [3] may provide one avenue in which a plaintiff may challenge an employer's practice of
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Navigating the Land Mines of the Family and Medical Leave Act Dress and Grooming Standards: How Legal are They? EQUAL PAY ACT CASES IN HIGHER EDUCATION Disparate Impact Discrimination and the ADEA: Coming of Age Disciplining Employees for Free Speech, Whistle Blowing, and Political Activities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1