以技能为基础的方法对减少初级保健医生的病耻感的影响:一项双盲、平行集群、随机对照试验的结果

Tara Beaulieu, S. Patten, S. Knaak, R. Weinerman, Helen L. Campbell, Bianca Lauria-Horner
{"title":"以技能为基础的方法对减少初级保健医生的病耻感的影响:一项双盲、平行集群、随机对照试验的结果","authors":"Tara Beaulieu, S. Patten, S. Knaak, R. Weinerman, Helen L. Campbell, Bianca Lauria-Horner","doi":"10.1177/0706743716686919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Most interventions to reduce stigma in health professionals emphasize education and social contact–based strategies. We sought to evaluate a novel skill-based approach: the British Columbia Adult Mental Health Practice Support Program. We sought to determine the program’s impact on primary care providers’ stigma and their perceived confidence and comfort in providing care for mentally ill patients. We hypothesized that enhanced skills and increased comfort and confidence on the part of practitioners would lead to diminished social distance and stigmatization. Subsequently, we explored the program’s impact on clinical outcomes and health care costs. These outcomes are reported separately, with reference to this article. Methods: In a double-blind, cluster randomized controlled trial, 111 primary care physicians were assigned to intervention or control groups. A validated stigma assessment tool, the Opening Minds Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC), was administered to both groups before and after training. Confidence and comfort were assessed using scales constructed from ad hoc items. Results: In the primary analysis, no significant differences in stigma were found. However, a subscale assessing social distance showed significant improvement in the intervention group after adjustment for a variable (practice size) that was unequally distributed in the randomization. Significant increases in confidence and comfort in managing mental illness were observed among intervention group physicians. A positive correlation was found between increased levels of confidence/comfort and improvements in overall stigma, especially in men. Conclusions: This study provides some preliminary evidence of a positive impact on health care professionals’ stigma through a skill-building approach to management of mild to moderate depression and anxiety in primary care. The intervention can be used as a primary vehicle for enhancing comfort and skills in health care providers and, ultimately, reducing an important dimension of stigma: preference for social distance.","PeriodicalId":309115,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Skill-Based Approaches in Reducing Stigma in Primary Care Physicians: Results from a Double-Blind, Parallel-Cluster, Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Tara Beaulieu, S. Patten, S. Knaak, R. Weinerman, Helen L. Campbell, Bianca Lauria-Horner\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0706743716686919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Most interventions to reduce stigma in health professionals emphasize education and social contact–based strategies. We sought to evaluate a novel skill-based approach: the British Columbia Adult Mental Health Practice Support Program. We sought to determine the program’s impact on primary care providers’ stigma and their perceived confidence and comfort in providing care for mentally ill patients. We hypothesized that enhanced skills and increased comfort and confidence on the part of practitioners would lead to diminished social distance and stigmatization. Subsequently, we explored the program’s impact on clinical outcomes and health care costs. These outcomes are reported separately, with reference to this article. Methods: In a double-blind, cluster randomized controlled trial, 111 primary care physicians were assigned to intervention or control groups. A validated stigma assessment tool, the Opening Minds Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC), was administered to both groups before and after training. Confidence and comfort were assessed using scales constructed from ad hoc items. Results: In the primary analysis, no significant differences in stigma were found. However, a subscale assessing social distance showed significant improvement in the intervention group after adjustment for a variable (practice size) that was unequally distributed in the randomization. Significant increases in confidence and comfort in managing mental illness were observed among intervention group physicians. A positive correlation was found between increased levels of confidence/comfort and improvements in overall stigma, especially in men. Conclusions: This study provides some preliminary evidence of a positive impact on health care professionals’ stigma through a skill-building approach to management of mild to moderate depression and anxiety in primary care. The intervention can be used as a primary vehicle for enhancing comfort and skills in health care providers and, ultimately, reducing an important dimension of stigma: preference for social distance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743716686919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743716686919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

目的:大多数减少卫生专业人员污名的干预措施强调教育和基于社会接触的策略。我们试图评估一种新的基于技能的方法:不列颠哥伦比亚省成人心理健康实践支持计划。我们试图确定该计划对初级保健提供者的耻辱感以及他们在为精神病患者提供护理时的感知信心和舒适度的影响。我们假设从业人员技能的提高、舒适度和自信心的增加会减少社会距离和污名化。随后,我们探讨了该计划对临床结果和医疗保健成本的影响。这些结果分别报告,并参考本文。方法:采用双盲、整群随机对照试验,将111名初级保健医生分为干预组和对照组。一种有效的病耻感评估工具,卫生保健提供者开放思想量表(OMS-HC),在培训前后对两组进行了管理。信心和舒适度采用由特别项目构建的量表进行评估。结果:在初步分析中,在柱头上没有发现显著差异。然而,评估社会距离的子量表显示,在调整随机化中不均匀分布的变量(实践大小)后,干预组有显著改善。干预组医生在处理精神疾病方面的信心和舒适度显著提高。研究发现,自信/舒适程度的提高与总体耻辱感的改善之间存在正相关,尤其是在男性中。结论:本研究提供了一些初步证据,表明在初级保健中通过技能建设方法管理轻至中度抑郁和焦虑对卫生保健专业人员的耻辱感有积极影响。该干预措施可作为提高卫生保健提供者舒适度和技能的主要手段,并最终减少污名化的一个重要方面:偏好社交距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Skill-Based Approaches in Reducing Stigma in Primary Care Physicians: Results from a Double-Blind, Parallel-Cluster, Randomized Controlled Trial
Objective: Most interventions to reduce stigma in health professionals emphasize education and social contact–based strategies. We sought to evaluate a novel skill-based approach: the British Columbia Adult Mental Health Practice Support Program. We sought to determine the program’s impact on primary care providers’ stigma and their perceived confidence and comfort in providing care for mentally ill patients. We hypothesized that enhanced skills and increased comfort and confidence on the part of practitioners would lead to diminished social distance and stigmatization. Subsequently, we explored the program’s impact on clinical outcomes and health care costs. These outcomes are reported separately, with reference to this article. Methods: In a double-blind, cluster randomized controlled trial, 111 primary care physicians were assigned to intervention or control groups. A validated stigma assessment tool, the Opening Minds Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC), was administered to both groups before and after training. Confidence and comfort were assessed using scales constructed from ad hoc items. Results: In the primary analysis, no significant differences in stigma were found. However, a subscale assessing social distance showed significant improvement in the intervention group after adjustment for a variable (practice size) that was unequally distributed in the randomization. Significant increases in confidence and comfort in managing mental illness were observed among intervention group physicians. A positive correlation was found between increased levels of confidence/comfort and improvements in overall stigma, especially in men. Conclusions: This study provides some preliminary evidence of a positive impact on health care professionals’ stigma through a skill-building approach to management of mild to moderate depression and anxiety in primary care. The intervention can be used as a primary vehicle for enhancing comfort and skills in health care providers and, ultimately, reducing an important dimension of stigma: preference for social distance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Combined Analysis of Genetically Correlated Traits Identifies Genes and Brain Regions for Insomnia: Une analyse combinée de traits génétiquement corrélés identifie les gènes et les régions du cerveau pour l’insomnie mGluR5 Facilitates Long-Term Synaptic Depression in a Stress-Induced Depressive Mouse Model Look Before You Leap: Representativeness of Those Completing Self-Reports in Early Psychosis Research Psychotherapies for Adolescents with Subclinical and Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Community Treatment Order Outcomes in Quebec: A Unique Jurisdiction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1