有效的可视化符号用于有效的利益相关者沟通

R. Laue, F. Hogrebe, Boris Böttcher, Markus Nüttgens
{"title":"有效的可视化符号用于有效的利益相关者沟通","authors":"R. Laue, F. Hogrebe, Boris Böttcher, Markus Nüttgens","doi":"10.1109/RE.2014.6912281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The visual syntax of modelling languages can support (or impede) the intuitive understandability of a model. We observed the process of problem solving with two notation variants of i* diagrams by means of an eye-tracking device. The number of wrongly answered questions was significantly lower when the alternative i* notation suggested by Moody et al. was used. For the eye-tracking metrics “time to solve a task” and “number of eye fixations”, no such significant result can be given. Furthermore, we identified a deficiency for the “dependency” symbol in the alternative notation.","PeriodicalId":307764,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient visual notations for efficient stakeholder communication\",\"authors\":\"R. Laue, F. Hogrebe, Boris Böttcher, Markus Nüttgens\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RE.2014.6912281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The visual syntax of modelling languages can support (or impede) the intuitive understandability of a model. We observed the process of problem solving with two notation variants of i* diagrams by means of an eye-tracking device. The number of wrongly answered questions was significantly lower when the alternative i* notation suggested by Moody et al. was used. For the eye-tracking metrics “time to solve a task” and “number of eye fixations”, no such significant result can be given. Furthermore, we identified a deficiency for the “dependency” symbol in the alternative notation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":307764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2014.6912281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2014.6912281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

建模语言的可视化语法可以支持(或阻碍)模型的直观可理解性。我们用眼动仪观察了用i*图的两种符号变体解决问题的过程。当使用Moody等人建议的替代i*符号时,错误回答的问题数量明显降低。对于眼动追踪指标“解决任务的时间”和“眼睛注视的次数”,没有这样显著的结果。此外,我们还发现了替代表示法中“依赖”符号的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficient visual notations for efficient stakeholder communication
The visual syntax of modelling languages can support (or impede) the intuitive understandability of a model. We observed the process of problem solving with two notation variants of i* diagrams by means of an eye-tracking device. The number of wrongly answered questions was significantly lower when the alternative i* notation suggested by Moody et al. was used. For the eye-tracking metrics “time to solve a task” and “number of eye fixations”, no such significant result can be given. Furthermore, we identified a deficiency for the “dependency” symbol in the alternative notation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automated detection and resolution of legal cross references: Approach and a study of Luxembourg's legislation Towards a situation awareness design to improve visually impaired orientation in unfamiliar buildings: Requirements elicitation study Capturing and sharing domain knowledge with business rules lessons learned from a global software vendor Automated support for combinational creativity in requirements engineering Non-functional requirements as qualities, with a spice of ontology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1