On the assessment of the state of integrated security of industrial enterprises

Introduction. The article presents a methodically described, consistent algorithm for assessing the state of integrated safety of industrial enterprises that are classified as hazardous production facilities. A study was conducted in choosing a method that allows calculating the weighting coefficients of the estimated measures, the implementation of which is provided by services (structural divisions) performing labor functions to maintain the integrated security system of the enterprises under consideration at the required level. Goals and objectives. The main purpose of the article is to identify the causes of hazards in cases when the danger (accident or fire) occurs with the coverage of two or more departmental (industry) security subsystems that are part of the complex security of the enterprise. Reduction of hazards (accidents and fires) at industrial enterprises is carried out at the expense of resource investments directed to minimize (exclude) the conditions (prerequisites) for the occurrence of risky events that can be transformed into accidents or fires. However, due to the limitations of the resource allocated by the enterprise to ensure its comprehensive security, there is a need to identify those places (points) whose risk indicator is high (critical), requiring a response to them without delay. It is proposed to normalize each event included in the content of the checklist for checking the enterprise for both industrial and fire safety. Methods. The choice of the hierarchy analysis method is justified, the use of which, based on a pairwise comparison of factors and alternatives, allows us to determine a local priority indicator for each element under study. Results and their discussion. The algorithm of sequential actions presented in the article in the form of a detailed description allows you to set an indicator measured in the form of a quantitative value for each event held. Conclusions. An example is presented in a fragmentary form showing the order and sequence of obtaining local and global priorities, where the definition of local priorities indicates the weight of a characteristically described event that caused a hazard (accident and fire). Obtaining weighting factors in the form of global priorities is directly related to the services (structural divisions) performing labor functions to maintain the enterprise's integrated security system at the required level. Key words: complex security, hierarchy analysis, factor, evaluation indicator, expert, consistency ratio.