在开发过程中测试安全性:为什么我们应该放弃渗透和补丁

Gary McGraw
{"title":"在开发过程中测试安全性:为什么我们应该放弃渗透和补丁","authors":"Gary McGraw","doi":"10.1109/CMPASS.1997.613270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the commercial sector security analysis has traditionally been applied at the network system level, after release, using tiger team approaches. After a successful tiger team penetration, specific system vulnerability is patched. I make a case for applying software engineering analysis techniques that have proven successful in the software safety arena to security-critical software code. This work is based on the generally held belief that a large proportion of security violations result from errors introduced during software development.","PeriodicalId":377266,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of COMPASS '97: 12th Annual Conference on Computer Assurance","volume":"491 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing for security during development: why we should scrap penetrate-and-patch\",\"authors\":\"Gary McGraw\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CMPASS.1997.613270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the commercial sector security analysis has traditionally been applied at the network system level, after release, using tiger team approaches. After a successful tiger team penetration, specific system vulnerability is patched. I make a case for applying software engineering analysis techniques that have proven successful in the software safety arena to security-critical software code. This work is based on the generally held belief that a large proportion of security violations result from errors introduced during software development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of COMPASS '97: 12th Annual Conference on Computer Assurance\",\"volume\":\"491 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"52\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of COMPASS '97: 12th Annual Conference on Computer Assurance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CMPASS.1997.613270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of COMPASS '97: 12th Annual Conference on Computer Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CMPASS.1997.613270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

摘要

在商业领域,安全分析传统上应用于网络系统级别,发布后,使用老虎团队方法。在老虎团队成功渗透后,特定的系统漏洞被修补。我将在软件安全领域证明成功的软件工程分析技术应用于对安全性至关重要的软件代码。这项工作是基于一种普遍的信念,即大部分的安全违规是由软件开发过程中引入的错误造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testing for security during development: why we should scrap penetrate-and-patch
In the commercial sector security analysis has traditionally been applied at the network system level, after release, using tiger team approaches. After a successful tiger team penetration, specific system vulnerability is patched. I make a case for applying software engineering analysis techniques that have proven successful in the software safety arena to security-critical software code. This work is based on the generally held belief that a large proportion of security violations result from errors introduced during software development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Software testing: from theory to practice Tools for formal specification, verification, and validation of requirements Using the B-toolkit to ensure safety in SCR specifications Evolving directions in formal methods Testing for security during development: why we should scrap penetrate-and-patch
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1