存在舞弊风险因素时的光环效应:对审计师怀疑态度的检验

Kevan L. Jensen, Mark Smith
{"title":"存在舞弊风险因素时的光环效应:对审计师怀疑态度的检验","authors":"Kevan L. Jensen, Mark Smith","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3135339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is the first stage of a multi part study examining halo effects among auditors. We specifically examine two questions: (1) Are auditors susceptible to halo effects, and (2) Does the presence of fraud risk factors mitigate halo effects by increasing auditor objectivity and skepticism? The latter question is motivated by SAS 99 which specifically links the concepts of fraud risk and auditor skepticism. Results of a single experiment are both striking and unexpected. Despite successful halo manipulations, judgments by student participants did not exhibit halo effects in the absence of fraud risk factors, but did exhibit significant halo effects in the presence of fraud risk factors. These results suggest that auditors may not be subject to halo effects directly, but become subject to halo effects when processing other information/evidence.","PeriodicalId":376768,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Psychology (Topic)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Halo Effect in the Presence of Fraud Risk Factors: An Examination of Auditor Skepticism\",\"authors\":\"Kevan L. Jensen, Mark Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3135339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study is the first stage of a multi part study examining halo effects among auditors. We specifically examine two questions: (1) Are auditors susceptible to halo effects, and (2) Does the presence of fraud risk factors mitigate halo effects by increasing auditor objectivity and skepticism? The latter question is motivated by SAS 99 which specifically links the concepts of fraud risk and auditor skepticism. Results of a single experiment are both striking and unexpected. Despite successful halo manipulations, judgments by student participants did not exhibit halo effects in the absence of fraud risk factors, but did exhibit significant halo effects in the presence of fraud risk factors. These results suggest that auditors may not be subject to halo effects directly, but become subject to halo effects when processing other information/evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: Psychology (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: Psychology (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3135339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Psychology (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3135339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究是一项多部分研究的第一阶段,研究了审计师之间的光环效应。我们特别研究了两个问题:(1)审计师是否容易受到光环效应的影响,(2)欺诈风险因素的存在是否通过增加审计师的客观性和怀疑态度来减轻光环效应?后一个问题的动机是SAS 99,它特别将欺诈风险和审计师怀疑的概念联系起来。单个实验的结果既引人注目又出乎意料。尽管成功地操纵了光环,学生参与者的判断在没有欺诈风险因素的情况下没有表现出光环效应,但在存在欺诈风险因素的情况下确实表现出显著的光环效应。这些结果表明,审计师可能不会直接受到光环效应的影响,但在处理其他信息/证据时可能会受到光环效应的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Halo Effect in the Presence of Fraud Risk Factors: An Examination of Auditor Skepticism
This study is the first stage of a multi part study examining halo effects among auditors. We specifically examine two questions: (1) Are auditors susceptible to halo effects, and (2) Does the presence of fraud risk factors mitigate halo effects by increasing auditor objectivity and skepticism? The latter question is motivated by SAS 99 which specifically links the concepts of fraud risk and auditor skepticism. Results of a single experiment are both striking and unexpected. Despite successful halo manipulations, judgments by student participants did not exhibit halo effects in the absence of fraud risk factors, but did exhibit significant halo effects in the presence of fraud risk factors. These results suggest that auditors may not be subject to halo effects directly, but become subject to halo effects when processing other information/evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Managerial Overconfidence and Self-Reported Success How to Talk Down Your Stock Performance Director Overconfidence Mergers and the Market for Busy Directors: An International Analysis When Inequality is Good for Groups: The Moderating Role of Fairness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1