“这是中国的哭墙”

Sonya E. Pritzker, Tony Hu
{"title":"“这是中国的哭墙”","authors":"Sonya E. Pritzker, Tony Hu","doi":"10.1075/lcs.22002.pri","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Dr. Li Wenliang, an ophthalmologist at Wuhan Central Hospital, was accused of spreading rumors when he sent a\n WeChat message containing the diagnostic report of a suspicious pneumonia case to a group of friends. When he later died from\n COVID-19, his Weibo page quickly become known as “China’s Wailing Wall,” where hundreds of thousands of netizen shared replies to\n his final post in a mega-thread that continues into the present. Drawing upon a selection of posts from an archive of messages\n posted to Li’s Weibo in the year following his death, this article examines how participants used chronotopes (Bhaktin 1981) to situate Li vis-à-vis\n various culturally salient “figures of personhood” (Agha 2005; Park 2021), including “moral hero,” “kin figure,” and/or “deity.” Our analysis further suggests how such\n positioning, as a response to grief and uncertainty, “moved” authors into a position of distance from hegemonic national\n chronotopes situating people in a symbiotic relationship of mutual care with the Chinese state. Our analysis thus offers\n insight into the ways in which collective crises have the capacity to (but do not necessarily) motivate a complex discursive and\n relational process through which interlocutors enact scalar intimacy (Pritzker and Perrino 2020) as they grapple with shifts in their felt experience of nationhood and/or “culture.”","PeriodicalId":252896,"journal":{"name":"Language, Culture and Society","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“This is China’s Wailing Wall”\",\"authors\":\"Sonya E. Pritzker, Tony Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lcs.22002.pri\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Dr. Li Wenliang, an ophthalmologist at Wuhan Central Hospital, was accused of spreading rumors when he sent a\\n WeChat message containing the diagnostic report of a suspicious pneumonia case to a group of friends. When he later died from\\n COVID-19, his Weibo page quickly become known as “China’s Wailing Wall,” where hundreds of thousands of netizen shared replies to\\n his final post in a mega-thread that continues into the present. Drawing upon a selection of posts from an archive of messages\\n posted to Li’s Weibo in the year following his death, this article examines how participants used chronotopes (Bhaktin 1981) to situate Li vis-à-vis\\n various culturally salient “figures of personhood” (Agha 2005; Park 2021), including “moral hero,” “kin figure,” and/or “deity.” Our analysis further suggests how such\\n positioning, as a response to grief and uncertainty, “moved” authors into a position of distance from hegemonic national\\n chronotopes situating people in a symbiotic relationship of mutual care with the Chinese state. Our analysis thus offers\\n insight into the ways in which collective crises have the capacity to (but do not necessarily) motivate a complex discursive and\\n relational process through which interlocutors enact scalar intimacy (Pritzker and Perrino 2020) as they grapple with shifts in their felt experience of nationhood and/or “culture.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":252896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language, Culture and Society\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language, Culture and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.22002.pri\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language, Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.22002.pri","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

武汉市中心医院眼科医生李文亮因向一群朋友发送含有疑似肺炎病例诊断报告的微信而被控散布谣言。当他后来死于COVID-19时,他的微博页面很快被称为“中国的哭墙”,数十万网民在这里分享了他最后一条微博的回复,这个帖子一直持续到现在。本文选取了李去世后一年内在他的微博上发布的信息档案中的一些帖子,研究了参与者如何使用时间点(Bhaktin 1981)将李与-à-vis不同文化上突出的“人格人物”(Agha 2005;(Park 2021),包括“道德英雄”、“亲属形象”和/或“神”。我们的分析进一步表明,作为对悲伤和不确定性的回应,这种定位是如何将作者“移动”到一个远离霸权国家时间点的位置上的,这种时间点将人们置于与中国国家相互关心的共生关系中。因此,我们的分析提供了洞察集体危机有能力(但不一定)激发一个复杂的话语和关系过程的方式,通过这个过程,对话者在努力应对他们对国家和/或“文化”的感受经验的转变时,制定了标量亲密关系(Pritzker和Perrino 2020)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“This is China’s Wailing Wall”
Dr. Li Wenliang, an ophthalmologist at Wuhan Central Hospital, was accused of spreading rumors when he sent a WeChat message containing the diagnostic report of a suspicious pneumonia case to a group of friends. When he later died from COVID-19, his Weibo page quickly become known as “China’s Wailing Wall,” where hundreds of thousands of netizen shared replies to his final post in a mega-thread that continues into the present. Drawing upon a selection of posts from an archive of messages posted to Li’s Weibo in the year following his death, this article examines how participants used chronotopes (Bhaktin 1981) to situate Li vis-à-vis various culturally salient “figures of personhood” (Agha 2005; Park 2021), including “moral hero,” “kin figure,” and/or “deity.” Our analysis further suggests how such positioning, as a response to grief and uncertainty, “moved” authors into a position of distance from hegemonic national chronotopes situating people in a symbiotic relationship of mutual care with the Chinese state. Our analysis thus offers insight into the ways in which collective crises have the capacity to (but do not necessarily) motivate a complex discursive and relational process through which interlocutors enact scalar intimacy (Pritzker and Perrino 2020) as they grapple with shifts in their felt experience of nationhood and/or “culture.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Algorithmic power and scientific knowledge Manufacturing Academic Knowledge ‘But we’re among peers!’ Seeking access. Applied ethnopoetic analysis Seeking access. Applied ethnopoetic analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1