优化嘴唇的美学比例,使用外科放置硅胶植入唇增大

R. Troell
{"title":"优化嘴唇的美学比例,使用外科放置硅胶植入唇增大","authors":"R. Troell","doi":"10.1177/07488068221104573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lip augmentation can be achieved using dermal fillers, biological tissues (fat, fascia, scar tissue, Alloderm), and a permanent soft silastic implant. Patients choosing the permanent lip implant were evaluated for aesthetic outcome, patient satisfaction, complications, and the use of dermal fillers postoperatively. Retrospective review of lip implant augmentation was performed in a single private practice. Analysis of aesthetic outcomes, adverse effects, methodology to determine optimal lip implant size, surgical technique caveats, and the use of dermal fillers before and after lip implant placement was carried out. Aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction were assessed by direct patient questioning and surgeon observation. A total of 100 lip implant augmentation patients with 192 implants (92 combined upper and lower lips, 4 upper lip only, 4 lower lip only) were placed by the author between May 2011 and September 2021. From a patient satisfaction standpoint, 97% were happy with the final lip augmentation outcome. There was a complication incidence of 8%, with implant asymmetry the most common. Some patients (7%) underwent dermal fillers, both polymethylmethacrylate to the vermillion border and hyaluronic acid filler to the bulk of the lip to provide additional lip enhancement. Silastic lip implant satisfies the following factors for lip augmentation: precise, accepted by the host, modifiable, natural feel, readily reversible, and permanency. The author’s quantitative method uses primarily the “golden ratio” (1:1.62) as the most impactful metric of size determination of the upper and lower lip followed by two-third incisor dental show. Most patients (94%) used lip dermal fillers prior to surgery to assess satisfaction with lip augmentation. Our results revealed larger lip implant size placement (4- and 5-mm diameter implants) compared with the largest study published. Lip bulk augmentation with hyaluronic acid fillers injected superficial to the implant capsule may be performed safely after permanent lip implant placement to achieve the patients’ desired outcome. It is best to be an advanced filler injector and to use a microcannula for filler placement. The soft silastic lip implant procedure is a simple surgical procedure with a high patient satisfaction rate and low complication rate. Knowledge of lip aesthetic mathematical ratios and degree of dental show is imperative. Additional lip enhancement to lip bulk and vermillion border using both temporary and permanent dermal fillers may be performed safely after permanent lip implant placement to achieve the patients’ desired outcome.","PeriodicalId":297650,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing the Lip Aesthetic Ratio Using Surgically Placed Silastic Implants for Lip Augmentation\",\"authors\":\"R. Troell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07488068221104573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lip augmentation can be achieved using dermal fillers, biological tissues (fat, fascia, scar tissue, Alloderm), and a permanent soft silastic implant. Patients choosing the permanent lip implant were evaluated for aesthetic outcome, patient satisfaction, complications, and the use of dermal fillers postoperatively. Retrospective review of lip implant augmentation was performed in a single private practice. Analysis of aesthetic outcomes, adverse effects, methodology to determine optimal lip implant size, surgical technique caveats, and the use of dermal fillers before and after lip implant placement was carried out. Aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction were assessed by direct patient questioning and surgeon observation. A total of 100 lip implant augmentation patients with 192 implants (92 combined upper and lower lips, 4 upper lip only, 4 lower lip only) were placed by the author between May 2011 and September 2021. From a patient satisfaction standpoint, 97% were happy with the final lip augmentation outcome. There was a complication incidence of 8%, with implant asymmetry the most common. Some patients (7%) underwent dermal fillers, both polymethylmethacrylate to the vermillion border and hyaluronic acid filler to the bulk of the lip to provide additional lip enhancement. Silastic lip implant satisfies the following factors for lip augmentation: precise, accepted by the host, modifiable, natural feel, readily reversible, and permanency. The author’s quantitative method uses primarily the “golden ratio” (1:1.62) as the most impactful metric of size determination of the upper and lower lip followed by two-third incisor dental show. Most patients (94%) used lip dermal fillers prior to surgery to assess satisfaction with lip augmentation. Our results revealed larger lip implant size placement (4- and 5-mm diameter implants) compared with the largest study published. Lip bulk augmentation with hyaluronic acid fillers injected superficial to the implant capsule may be performed safely after permanent lip implant placement to achieve the patients’ desired outcome. It is best to be an advanced filler injector and to use a microcannula for filler placement. The soft silastic lip implant procedure is a simple surgical procedure with a high patient satisfaction rate and low complication rate. Knowledge of lip aesthetic mathematical ratios and degree of dental show is imperative. Additional lip enhancement to lip bulk and vermillion border using both temporary and permanent dermal fillers may be performed safely after permanent lip implant placement to achieve the patients’ desired outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07488068221104573\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07488068221104573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

丰唇可以使用真皮填充物、生物组织(脂肪、筋膜、疤痕组织、异体真皮)和永久性软橡胶植入物来实现。对选择永久唇种植体的患者进行美学结果、患者满意度、并发症和术后真皮填充物的使用评估。回顾性审查的唇种植隆胸进行了在一个单一的私人执业。分析了美学结果、不良反应、确定最佳唇种植体尺寸的方法、手术技术注意事项以及唇种植体放置前后真皮填充物的使用。通过患者直接询问和外科医生观察来评估美学效果和患者满意度。作者于2011年5月至2021年9月共为100例唇部隆胸患者植入了192个假体(92个为上下唇合并,4个为上唇,4个为下唇)。从患者满意度的角度来看,97%的人对最终的丰唇结果感到满意。并发症发生率为8%,其中种植体不对称最为常见。一些患者(7%)接受了真皮填充物,包括在朱红色边缘的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯和在大部分嘴唇的透明质酸填充物,以提供额外的嘴唇增强。硅胶丰唇满足以下因素:精确、可接受、可修改、手感自然、易逆转、永久性。作者的定量方法主要采用“黄金比例”(1:1.62)作为最具影响力的尺度来确定上下唇的大小,其次是三分之二的门牙显示。大多数患者(94%)在手术前使用唇皮填充物来评估对丰唇的满意度。我们的结果显示更大的唇种植尺寸放置(4和5毫米直径的种植体)相比,最大的研究发表。用透明质酸填充物注入植入物囊的表面,可以安全地在永久性唇植入物放置后进行唇体积增大,以达到患者期望的结果。最好是一个先进的填充物注入器,并使用微套管填充。软硅橡胶唇种植术是一种简单的手术方法,患者满意率高,并发症发生率低。嘴唇美学的知识,数学比例和程度的牙齿显示是必要的。使用临时和永久性真皮填充物对唇的体积和朱红色边界进行额外的嘴唇增强,可以安全地在永久性唇植入后进行,以达到患者期望的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimizing the Lip Aesthetic Ratio Using Surgically Placed Silastic Implants for Lip Augmentation
Lip augmentation can be achieved using dermal fillers, biological tissues (fat, fascia, scar tissue, Alloderm), and a permanent soft silastic implant. Patients choosing the permanent lip implant were evaluated for aesthetic outcome, patient satisfaction, complications, and the use of dermal fillers postoperatively. Retrospective review of lip implant augmentation was performed in a single private practice. Analysis of aesthetic outcomes, adverse effects, methodology to determine optimal lip implant size, surgical technique caveats, and the use of dermal fillers before and after lip implant placement was carried out. Aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction were assessed by direct patient questioning and surgeon observation. A total of 100 lip implant augmentation patients with 192 implants (92 combined upper and lower lips, 4 upper lip only, 4 lower lip only) were placed by the author between May 2011 and September 2021. From a patient satisfaction standpoint, 97% were happy with the final lip augmentation outcome. There was a complication incidence of 8%, with implant asymmetry the most common. Some patients (7%) underwent dermal fillers, both polymethylmethacrylate to the vermillion border and hyaluronic acid filler to the bulk of the lip to provide additional lip enhancement. Silastic lip implant satisfies the following factors for lip augmentation: precise, accepted by the host, modifiable, natural feel, readily reversible, and permanency. The author’s quantitative method uses primarily the “golden ratio” (1:1.62) as the most impactful metric of size determination of the upper and lower lip followed by two-third incisor dental show. Most patients (94%) used lip dermal fillers prior to surgery to assess satisfaction with lip augmentation. Our results revealed larger lip implant size placement (4- and 5-mm diameter implants) compared with the largest study published. Lip bulk augmentation with hyaluronic acid fillers injected superficial to the implant capsule may be performed safely after permanent lip implant placement to achieve the patients’ desired outcome. It is best to be an advanced filler injector and to use a microcannula for filler placement. The soft silastic lip implant procedure is a simple surgical procedure with a high patient satisfaction rate and low complication rate. Knowledge of lip aesthetic mathematical ratios and degree of dental show is imperative. Additional lip enhancement to lip bulk and vermillion border using both temporary and permanent dermal fillers may be performed safely after permanent lip implant placement to achieve the patients’ desired outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Periareolar Mastopexy: A Historical Appraisal of Technique and Further Technical Refinements Toward Reliable, Lasting, and Reproducible Results Direct Lip Lift: The Sashimi Technique Indirect Lip Lift With Modified Suspension Technique to Pyriform Ligament In Vitro Analysis of Dissolution of 18 HA-based Dermal Fillers with Tailored Hyaluronidase Dosing to Achieve Urgent Reversal of Vascular Complications Lower Blepharoplasty With Fat Transposition and Three-Vector Suspension Technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1